World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5138 4764 2829 2561 101 13581

James Loughead publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James Loughead between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James Loughead published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2009. 7 of the 112 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2009. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1999 2025

112 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James Loughead: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 3
2004 0
2005 4
2006 3
2007 7
2008 9
2009 11
2010 7
2011 8
2012 4
2013 7
2014 6
2015 1
2016 5
2017 5
2018 4
2019 4
2020 5
2021 1
2022 3
2023 6
2024 5
2025 2
Total 112
Download as CSV

James Loughead publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Loughead sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 101
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James Loughead D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Loughead sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James Loughead is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a strong emphasis on medicine, neuroscience, and psychology. Their academic contributions include 19 publications in medicine, 13 in neuroscience, and 11 in psychology.

Their work delves into subfields such as cognitive neuroscience and physiology, each represented by six publications. Additionally, clinical psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, and genetics are notable areas of their research.

Main topics of Loughead's research include smoking behavior and cessation, functional brain connectivity studies, and stress responses involving cortisol. Other focal points in their studies cover biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor studies, behavioral health and interventions, and menopause-related health impacts and treatments.

Frequent co-authors working alongside Loughead include C. Neill Epperson, Mary D. Sammel, Daniel D. Langleben, Zhenhao Shi, and Wen Cao.

Loughead has published articles in several journals and venues, such as Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, Maturitas, Translational Psychiatry, Tobacco Control, and Addiction.

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Loughead include:

  • Executive function after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: does current mood and early life adversity matter? (2020, Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society)
  • Natural vs. surgical postmenopause and psychological symptoms confound the effect of menopause on executive functioning domains of cognitive experience (2023, Maturitas)
  • Impact of childhood adversity on network reconfiguration dynamics during working memory in hypogonadal women (2020, Psychoneuroendocrinology)
  • Progesterone Increases Nicotine Withdrawal and Anxiety in Male but Not Female Smokers During Brief Abstinence (2022, Nicotine & Tobacco Research)
  • Divergent Amygdala Volume Asymmetries for Male and Female Youth With High Versus Low Callous-Unemotional Traits (2020, Crime & Delinquency)

Best Publications

  • An Improved Framework for Confound Regression and Filtering for Control of Motion Artifact in the Preprocessing of Resting-State Functional Connectivity Data

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Mark A. Elliott;Raphael T. Gerraty;Kosha Ruparel

  • Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth.

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Daniel H. Wolf;James Loughead;Kosha Ruparel

  • Baby Schema in Infant Faces Induces Cuteness Perception and Motivation for Caretaking in Adults

    Melanie L. Glocker;Daniel D. Langleben;Kosha Ruparel;James W. Loughead

  • Neuroimaging of the Philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort.

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Mark A. Elliott;Kosha Ruparel;James Loughead

  • Age group and sex differences in performance on a computerized neurocognitive battery in children age 8-21.

    Ruben C. Gur;Jan Richard;Monica E. Calkins;Rosetta Chiavacci

  • Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: Application to lie detection

    Christos Davatzikos;Kosha Ruparel;Yong Fan;Dinggang Shen

  • Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women

    Melanie L. Glocker;Daniel D. Langleben;Daniel D. Langleben;Kosha Ruparel;James W. Loughead

  • Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event‐related fMRI

    Daniel D. Langleben;James W. Loughead;Warren B. Bilker;Kosha Ruparel

  • Age-related differences in brain activation during emotional face processing

    Faith M. Gunning-Dixon;Ruben C. Gur;Alexis C. Perkins;Lee Schroeder

  • Neural substrates for functionally discriminating self-face from personally familiar faces

    Steven M. Platek;James W. Loughead;Ruben C. Gur;Samantha Busch

  • Functional maturation of the executive system during adolescence.

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Daniel H. Wolf;Guray Erus;Kosha Ruparel

  • Limbic activation associated with misidentification of fearful faces and flat affect in schizophrenia.

    Raquel E. Gur;James Loughead;Christian G. Kohler;Mark A. Elliott

  • Large-Scale Brain Network Coupling Predicts Acute Nicotine Abstinence Effects on Craving and Cognitive Function

    Caryn Lerman;Hong Gu;James Loughead;Kosha Ruparel

  • Varenicline improves mood and cognition during smoking abstinence.

    Freda Patterson;Christopher Jepson;Andrew A. Strasser;James Loughead

  • Acute Effect of Methadone Maintenance Dose on Brain fMRI Response to Heroin-Related Cues

    Daniel D Langleben;Kosha Ruparel;Igor Elman;Samantha Busch-Winokur

  • Working memory deficits predict short-term smoking resumption following brief abstinence.

    Freda Patterson;Christopher Jepson;James Loughead;Kenneth Perkins

  • Sensory Contributions to Impaired Emotion Processing in Schizophrenia

    Pamela D. Butler;Pamela D. Butler;Pamela D. Butler;Ilana Y. Abeles;Ilana Y. Abeles;Nicole G. Weiskopf;Arielle Tambini

  • "It's Not What You Say, But How You Say it": A Reciprocal Temporo-frontal Network for Affective Prosody.

    David I. Leitman;Daniel H. Wolf;J. Daniel Ragland;Petri Laukka

  • Being right is its own reward: load and performance related ventral striatum activation to correct responses during a working memory task in youth.

    Theodore D. Satterthwaite;Kosha Ruparel;James Loughead;Mark A. Elliott

  • Reduced prefrontal and temporal processing and recall of high "sensation value" ads.

    Daniel D. Langleben;James W. Loughead;Kosha Ruparel;Jonathan G. Hakun

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruben C. Gur
Ruben C. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Kosha Ruparel
Kosha Ruparel University of Pennsylvania
Raquel E. Gur
Raquel E. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Caryn Lerman
Caryn Lerman University of Southern California
Mark A. Elliott
Mark A. Elliott University of Pennsylvania
Daniel H. Wolf
Daniel H. Wolf University of Pennsylvania
Christian G. Kohler
Christian G. Kohler University of Pennsylvania
Theodore D. Satterthwaite
Theodore D. Satterthwaite University of Pennsylvania
Warren B. Bilker
Warren B. Bilker University of Pennsylvania
Steven J. Siegel
Steven J. Siegel University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees offer flexible learning options for students across the United States. As interest in psychology grows, many are seeking cheapest online psychology bachelor's in Minnesota and other regions to balance affordability with quality education. These accredited online programs make it easier to pursue your studies while managing work and family commitments.

For those in urban areas, there are several affordable online psychology bachelor's programs in St. Louis that provide convenient local options. Similarly, students in the Northeast will find a range of affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in New York designed for varied interests and budgets.

In the Southern U.S., you can explore the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in the South that cater to both entry-level learners and those seeking advancement. Earning your degree online unlocks diverse career pathways, including counseling, human resources, social services, and further graduate study, setting the foundation for long-term professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing James Loughead

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles