World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
39714
World Ranking
7945
National Ranking
4131

Mark B. Orringer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark B. Orringer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 381 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark B. Orringer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark B. Orringer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark B. Orringer is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on surgery and related subfields. Their research output includes a significant number of publications emphasizing esophageal and gastrointestinal conditions.

Their main fields of study include medicine, with a particular focus on surgery and pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Additional subfields covered in their work are emergency medical services, public health, environmental and occupational health, and emergency medicine.

The principal topics of Orringer's research encompass:

  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques

Orringer has published multiple papers in key academic journals, with some of their recent works including:

  • "A novel cervical esophagogastric anastomosis simulator," 2020, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • "Cardiothoracic Surgeons in Pandemics: Ethical Considerations," 2020, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • "Quantitative perfusion assessment of gastric conduit with indocyanine green dye to predict anastomotic leak after esophagectomy," 2021, Diseases of the Esophagus
  • "Long-Term Quality of Life Following Endoscopic Therapy Compared to Esophagectomy for Neoplastic Barrett's Esophagus," 2020, Digestive Diseases and Sciences
  • "Cardiothoracic surgeons in pandemics: Ethical considerations," 2020, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

The frequent publication venues for Orringer's research include:

  • Diseases of the Esophagus
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • JTCVS Open

Frequent collaborators contributing to Orringer's research output are:

  • Jules Lin
  • Robert M. Sade
  • Kiran H. Lagisetty
  • Rishindra M. Reddy
  • John W. Entwistle

Best Publications

  • Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma

    Li Ding;Gad Getz;David A. Wheeler;Elaine R. Mardis

  • Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma

    David G. Beer;Sharon L.R. Kardia;Chiang Ching Huang;Thomas J. Giordano

  • Randomized Trial of Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Surgery Alone in Patients With Locoregional Esophageal Carcinoma

    Susan G. Urba;Mark B. Orringer;Andrew Turrisi;Mark Iannettoni

  • Characterizing the cancer genome in lung adenocarcinoma

    Barbara A. Weir;Barbara A. Weir;Michele S. Woo;Gad Getz;Sven Perner;Sven Perner

  • Discordant Protein and mRNA Expression in Lung Adenocarcinomas

    Guoan Chen;Tarek G. Gharib;Chiang Ching Huang;Jeremy M.G. Taylor

  • Gastric Cancer, Version 3.2016; Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

    Jaffer A. Ajani;Thomas A. D'Amico;Khaldoun Almhanna;David J. Bentrem

  • Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements.

    Mark B. Orringer;Becky Marshall;Mark D. Iannettoni

  • Esophagectomy without thoracotomy.

    Mark B. Orringer;Herbert Sloan

  • Two Thousand Transhiatal Esophagectomies Changing Trends, Lessons Learned

    Mark B. Orringer;Becky Marshall;Andrew C. Chang;Julia Lee

  • Gastric Cancer, Version 2.2013

    Jaffer A. Ajani;David J. Bentrem;Stephen Besh;Thomas A. D'Amico

  • Staging of mediastinal non-small cell lung cancer with FDG PET, CT, and fusion images: preliminary prospective evaluation.

    Richard L. Wahl;Leslie E. Quint;Robert L. Greenough;Charles R. Meyer

  • Normal mediastinal lymph nodes: number and size according to American Thoracic Society mapping.

    G. M. Glazer;B. H. Gross;L. E. Quint;I. R. Francis

  • Preoperative chemoradiation followed by transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus: final report.

    Arlene A. Forastiere;Mark B. Orringer;Claudia Perez-Tamayo;Susan G. Urba

  • Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis

    Mark B. Orringer;Becky Marshall;Mark D. Iannettoni

  • Proteomic Analysis of Lung Adenocarcinoma: Identification of a Highly Expressed Set of Proteins in Tumors

    Guoan Chen;Tarek G. Gharib;Chiang Ching Huang;Dafydd G. Thomas

  • Inhibition of interleukin 8 attenuates angiogenesis in bronchogenic carcinoma.

    Daniel R. Smith;Peter J. Polverini;Steven L. Kunkel;Mark B. Orringer

  • Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.

    Mark B. Orringer

  • Distribution of distant metastases from newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer.

    Leslie E. Quint;Srinivas Tummala;Louis J. Brisson;Isaac R. Francis

  • Achalasia. A morphologic study of 42 resected specimens.

    John R. Goldblum;Richard I. Whyte;Mark B. Orringer;Henry D. Appelman

  • Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2015.

    Jaffer A. Ajani;Thomas A. D'Amico;Khaldoun Almhanna;David J. Bentrem

Frequent Co-Authors

David G. Beer
David G. Beer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Dafydd G. Thomas
Dafydd G. Thomas University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas J. Giordano
Thomas J. Giordano University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas A. D'Amico
Thomas A. D'Amico Duke University
Samir M. Hanash
Samir M. Hanash The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Thomas W. Glover
Thomas W. Glover University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeremy M. G. Taylor
Jeremy M. G. Taylor University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John E. Mayer
John E. Mayer Boston Children's Hospital
Jaffer A. Ajani
Jaffer A. Ajani The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Rork Kuick
Rork Kuick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a medical career in the USA can take many shapes beyond traditional MD degrees. Online education now offers flexible avenues to advance your healthcare expertise and open new career doors. For example, pursuing a master's in health administration is a strategic move for those seeking leadership roles in healthcare. CAHME accredited online MHA programs set the gold standard for quality and professional recognition.

For registered nurses aiming to further their qualifications, options like RN to BSN no clinical hours programs make career progression more accessible, especially for those balancing work and family life. Meanwhile, advanced practice nurses can accelerate their learning with the quickest DNP program options, helping them reach top-tier clinical roles faster.

For those concerned about academic research demands, online DNP programs without dissertation requirements provide a streamlined approach to earning a doctoral degree, allowing you to focus more on clinical practice and leadership. These online pathways offer vital flexibility and can help you adapt your education to evolving career goals in the dynamic healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Mark B. Orringer

Trending Scientists