World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Canada
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
153
Citations
122942
World Ranking
1017
National Ranking
33

Ming-Sound Tsao publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ming-Sound Tsao sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 980 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ming-Sound Tsao D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ming-Sound Tsao sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 153 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Canada Leader Award
  • 2020 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science

Overview

Ming-Sound Tsao is affiliated with the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Canada and focuses on research primarily within the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work extensively covers pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, molecular biology, cancer research, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The researcher's scholarly output includes numerous publications centered on lung cancer treatments and mutations, cancer genomics and diagnostics, lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, lung cancer research studies, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, and RNA modifications in cancer.

Among their recent papers are:

  • "PD-L1 as a biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors" (2021) published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  • "The 2021 WHO Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Advances Since 2015" (2021) published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • "A Grading System for Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma: A Proposal From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee" (2020) published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • "IASLC Multidisciplinary Recommendations for Pathologic Assessment of Lung Cancer Resection Specimens After Neoadjuvant Therapy" (2020) published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • "The Promises and Challenges of Tumor Mutation Burden as an Immunotherapy Biomarker: A Perspective from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee" (2020) published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ming-Sound Tsao include Geoffrey Liu, Natasha B. Leighl, Frances A. Shepherd, Adrian G. Sacher, and Penelope A. Bradbury.

The primary venues for publishing their research are:

  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Lung Cancer
  • UNC Libraries

Their research topics also explore the application of machine learning and radiomics techniques within medical imaging as well as detailed studies of RNA modifications with respect to cancer biology.

Ming-Sound Tsao has been recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 2020 by the Academy of Science.

Best Publications

  • International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma

    William D Travis;Elisabeth Brambilla;Masayuki Noguchi;Andrew G Nicholson

  • Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma: The cancer genome atlas research network

    Eric A. Collisson;Joshua D. Campbell;Angela N. Brooks;Angela N. Brooks;Alice H. Berger

  • The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances Since the 2004 Classification

    William D. Travis;Elisabeth Brambilla;Andrew G. Nicholson;Yasushi Yatabe

  • The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers

    Rameen Beroukhim;Craig H. Mermel;Craig H. Mermel;Dale Porter;Guo Wei

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer.

    Peter Goldstraw;Kari Chansky;John Crowley;Ramon Rami-Porta

  • Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers

    Peter S. Hammerman;Doug Voet;Michael S. Lawrence;Douglas Voet

  • Pancreatic cancer genomes reveal aberrations in axon guidance pathway genes

    Andrew V. Biankin;Andrew V. Biankin;Andrew V. Biankin;Nicola Waddell;Karin S. Kassahn;Marie Claude Gingras

  • Erlotinib in lung cancer - molecular and clinical predictors of outcome.

    Ming Sound Tsao;Akira Sakurada;Jean Claude Cutz;Jean Claude Cutz;Chang Qi Zhu;Chang Qi Zhu

  • Vinorelbine plus Cisplatin vs. Observation in Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Timothy Winton;Robert Livingston;David H Johnson;James Rigas

  • International network of cancer genome projects

    Thomas J. Hudson;Thomas J. Hudson;Warwick Anderson;Axel Aretz;Anna D. Barker

  • Requirement for glycogen synthase kinase-3β in cell survival and NF-κB activation

    Klaus P. Hoeflich;Juan Luo;Elizabeth A. Rubie;Ming-Sound Tsao

  • Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology

    Neal I. Lindeman;Philip T. Cagle;Dara L. Aisner;Maria E. Arcila

  • PD-L1 as a biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors

    Deborah Blythe Doroshow;Sheena Bhalla;Mary Beth Beasley;Lynette M. Sholl

  • Probability of Cancer in Pulmonary Nodules Detected on First Screening CT

    Annette McWilliams;Martin C. Tammemagi;John R. Mayo;Heidi Roberts

  • Characterizing the cancer genome in lung adenocarcinoma

    Barbara A. Weir;Barbara A. Weir;Michele S. Woo;Gad Getz;Sven Perner;Sven Perner

  • PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Assays for Lung Cancer: Results from Phase 1 of the Blueprint PD-L1 IHC Assay Comparison Project

    Fred R. Hirsch;Abigail McElhinny;Dave Stanforth;James Ranger-Moore

  • Distinct patterns of somatic genome alterations in lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas

    Joshua D Campbell;Anton Alexandrov;Jaegil Kim;Jeremiah Wala

  • Gene expression-based survival prediction in lung adenocarcinoma: a multi-site, blinded validation study.

    Kerby Shedden;Jeremy M.G. Taylor;Steven A. Enkemann;Ming Sound Tsao

  • SOX2 is an amplified lineage-survival oncogene in lung and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas

    Adam J. Bass;Adam J. Bass;Hideo Watanabe;Hideo Watanabe;Craig H. Mermel;Craig H. Mermel;Soyoung Yu

  • An overview of the c-MET signaling pathway.

    Shawna Leslie Organ;Ming-Sound Tsao

Frequent Co-Authors

Frances A. Shepherd
Frances A. Shepherd Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Geoffrey Liu
Geoffrey Liu Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Natasha B. Leighl
Natasha B. Leighl Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Melania Pintilie
Melania Pintilie Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Suzanne Kamel-Reid
Suzanne Kamel-Reid University Health Network
Igor Jurisica
Igor Jurisica University Health Network
Lesley Seymour
Lesley Seymour Queen's University
Stephen Lam
Stephen Lam University of British Columbia
David W. Hedley
David W. Hedley Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Yasushi Yatabe
Yasushi Yatabe Nagoya University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA but wish to explore alternative or related career paths, there are a number of flexible online degrees and certifications available. These options can help you gain valuable skills and enter the healthcare workforce more quickly or affordably.

For those interested in the pharmaceutical field, pharmacy school online programs offer a pathway to becoming a licensed pharmacist, even if you need to keep working while you study. Another option is pursuing a bachelor of health information management online, which prepares graduates to manage patient data, medical records, and health IT systems.

If you prefer a fast-tracked entry into the medical sector, consider the cheapest medical coding certification online, ideal for those seeking administrative roles with minimal clinical focus. Additionally, nursing remains a highly rewarding career—affordable online programs such as the cheapest fnp programs can help registered nurses advance to family nurse practitioner (FNP) roles.

Exploring these related online pathways can broaden your options within healthcare and align your education with your career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Ming-Sound Tsao

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles