World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
4431
World Ranking
11167
National Ranking
5839

Mark D. Godley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Godley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark D. Godley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Godley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark D. Godley is affiliated with Chestnut Health Systems in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on substance abuse treatment and outcomes, health policy implementation science, and advanced causal inference techniques. The scientific contributions cover areas in health professions, medicine, and psychology, with particular attention to general health professions, statistics and probability, clinical psychology, epidemiology, and public health.

Key topics in their work include:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Community Health and Development
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Godley include:

  • Beth Ann Griffin
  • Lynsay Ayer
  • Lora L. Passetti
  • Alex R. Dopp
  • Donna L. Coffman

Publications by Mark D. Godley appear regularly in several venues, notably:

  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Implementation Science
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Implementation Science Communications
  • Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology

Recent papers by Godley include:

  • Comparing two federal financing strategies on penetration and sustainment of the adolescent community reinforcement approach for substance use disorders: protocol for a mixed-method study, 2022, Implementation Science Communications
  • A tutorial comparing different covariate balancing methods with an application evaluating the causal effects of substance use treatment programs for adolescents, 2022, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology
  • Trends and age-related disparities in opioid use disorder treatment admissions for adolescents and young adults, 2021, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Narrative Review: Revised Principles and Practice Recommendations for Adolescent Substance Use Treatment and Policy, 2024, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • A Tutorial for Propensity Score Weighting for Moderation Analysis With Categorical Variables, 2023, Medical Care

Best Publications

  • ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT BY DISULFIRAM AND COMMUNITY REINFORCEMENT THERAPY

    N.H. Azrin;R.W. Sisson;R. Meyers;M. Godley

  • The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) experiment: Rationale, study design and analysis plans.

    Michael Dennis;Janet C. Titus;Guy Diamond;Guy Diamond;Jean Donaldson

  • Preliminary outcomes from the assertive continuing care experiment for adolescents discharged from residential treatment

    Mark D Godley;Susan H Godley;Michael L Dennis;Rodney Funk

  • The effect of assertive continuing care on continuing care linkage, adherence and abstinence following residential treatment for adolescents with substance use disorders.

    Mark D. Godley;Susan H. Godley;Michael L. Dennis;Rodney R. Funk

  • Cross-validation of the alcohol and cannabis use measures in the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) and Timeline Followback (TLFB; Form 90) among adolescents in substance abuse treatment

    Michael L. Dennis;Rodney Funk;Susan Harrington Godley;Mark D. Godley

  • An Overview of the Effectiveness of Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment Models

    Randolph Muck;Kristin A. Zempolich;Janet C. Titus;Marc Fishman

  • Adolescent community reinforcement approach for adolescent cannabis use.

    Susan Harrington Godley;Robert J Meyers;Jane Ellen Smith;Tracy Karvinen

  • The stability and impact of environmental factors on substance use and problems after adolescent outpatient treatment for cannabis abuse or dependence.

    Mark D. Godley;Jeffrey H. Kahn;Michael L. Dennis;Susan H. Godley

  • A large-scale dissemination and implementation model for evidence-based treatment and continuing care

    Susan H. Godley;Bryan R. Garner;Jane Ellen Smith;Robert J. Meyers

  • Working alliance, treatment satisfaction, and patterns of posttreatment use among adolescent substance users.

    Brooke T. Tetzlaff;Jeffrey H. Kahn;Susan H. Godley;Mark D. Godley

  • A social-systems approach to resocializing alcoholics in the community.

    John H. Mallams;Mark D. Godley;George M. Hall;Robert J. Meyers

  • Adolescent outpatient treatment and continuing care: Main findings from a randomized clinical trial ☆

    Susan H. Godley;Bryan R. Garner;Lora L. Passetti;Rodney R. Funk

  • A randomized trial of assertive continuing care and contingency management for adolescents with substance use disorders.

    Mark D. Godley;Susan H. Godley;Michael L. Dennis;Rodney R. Funk

  • Contingency management for attendance to group substance abuse treatment administered by clinicians in community clinics.

    David M. Ledgerwood;Sheila M. Alessi;Tressa Hanson;Mark D. Godley

  • Using Pay for Performance to Improve Treatment Implementation for Adolescent Substance Use Disorders Results From a Cluster Randomized Trial

    Bryan R. Garner;Susan H. Godley;Michael L. Dennis;Brooke D. Hunter

  • Exposure to Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach treatment procedures as a mediator of the relationship between adolescent substance abuse treatment retention and outcome.

    Bryan R. Garner;Susan H. Godley;Rodney R. Funk;Michael L. Dennis

  • Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach outcomes differ among emerging adults and adolescents.

    Douglas C. Smith;Susan H. Godley;Mark D. Godley;Michael L. Dennis

  • Thirty-month relapse trajectory cluster groups among adolescents discharged from out-patient treatment.

    Susan H. Godley;Michael L. Dennis;Mark D. Godley;Rodney R. Funk

  • Entrepreneurship and Historical Explanation

    Mark Casson;Andrew Godley

  • Chapter 14 – The Assertive Aftercare Protocol for Adolescent Substance Abusers

    Susan Harrington Godley;Mark D. Godley;Michael L. Dennis

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan H. Godley
Susan H. Godley University of Miami
Rodney R. Funk
Rodney R. Funk Chestnut Health Systems
Michael L. Dennis
Michael L. Dennis Research Triangle Park Foundation
Jane Ellen Smith
Jane Ellen Smith University of New Mexico
Guy S. Diamond
Guy S. Diamond Drexel University
Yifrah Kaminer
Yifrah Kaminer University of Connecticut
Christy K. Scott
Christy K. Scott Chestnut Health Systems
Nancy M. Petry
Nancy M. Petry University of Connecticut
Howard A. Liddle
Howard A. Liddle University of Miami
Jeffrey H. Kahn
Jeffrey H. Kahn Illinois State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up diverse career options, including becoming a substance abuse counselor. Online degree programs offer flexibility for working professionals and students seeking specialized training. It’s important to note that educational and certification requirements can vary significantly by location.

For those considering becoming a substance abuse counselor in Arlington, a bachelor’s degree in psychology or a related field is typically required, along with supervised clinical experience and state-approved certification.

If you’re interested in how to become a substance abuse counselor in Atlanta, be prepared to meet state-specific licensing and supervised practice requirements. These may include passing exams and completing continuing education credits.

Understanding substance abuse counselor requirements in Aurora is also crucial, as the process may include background checks and additional ethics training. Each city can have its own unique requirements.

For guidance on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Austin, explore accredited online programs that align with Texas standards. Choosing the right degree and understanding local guidelines will help pave the way toward a fulfilling psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Godley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles