World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anastasia Yendiki

Anastasia Yendiki

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 41 7885 7279 3389 3064 121 6388

Anastasia Yendiki publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anastasia Yendiki between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anastasia Yendiki published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2021. 23 of the 168 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 4 publications
2000 2026

168 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anastasia Yendiki: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 4
2005 2
2006 3
2007 3
2008 0
2009 5
2010 3
2011 2
2012 4
2013 4
2014 4
2015 1
2016 5
2017 3
2018 10
2019 10
2020 14
2021 22
2022 14
2023 15
2024 15
2025 19
2026 4
Total 168
Download as CSV

Anastasia Yendiki publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anastasia Yendiki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 121 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522 121
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Anastasia Yendiki D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anastasia Yendiki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 41
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Anastasia Yendiki is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and neuroscience, with significant contributions to radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, cognitive neuroscience, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, experimental and cognitive psychology, and neurology.

Their work is centered around advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, advanced MRI techniques and applications, functional brain connectivity studies, MRI in cancer diagnosis, fetal and pediatric neurological disorders, mental health research topics, and the study of anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Yendiki has authored multiple papers, including the following recent ones:

  • Connectome 2.0: Developing the next-generation ultra-high gradient strength human MRI scanner for bridging studies of the micro-, meso- and macro-connectome (2021, NeuroImage)
  • Four Deep Brain Stimulation Targets for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Are They Different? (2020, Biological Psychiatry)
  • Post mortem mapping of connectional anatomy for the validation of diffusion MRI (2022, NeuroImage)
  • Controversies and progress on standardization of large-scale brain network nomenclature (2023, Network Neuroscience)
  • Diffusion MRI and anatomic tracing in the same brain reveal common failure modes of tractography (2021, NeuroImage)

The frequent coauthors working alongside Yendiki include:

  • Chiara Maffei
  • Susie Y. Huang
  • Suzanne N. Haber
  • Boris Keil
  • Gabriel Ramos-Llordén

Yendiki's research has been published in various venues, with recurrent contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • NeuroImage
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Imaging Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Automated probabilistic reconstruction of white-matter pathways in health and disease using an atlas of the underlying anatomy.

    Anastasia Yendiki;Patricia Panneck;Priti Srinivasan;Allison Stevens

  • Spurious group differences due to head motion in a diffusion MRI study

    Anastasia Yendiki;Kami Koldewyn;Sita Kakunoori;Nancy Kanwisher

  • Improving diffusion MRI using simultaneous multi-slice echo planar imaging.

    Kawin Setsompop;Julien Cohen-Adad;Borjan A. Gagoski;Tommi Raij

  • Tracking the Roots of Reading Ability: White Matter Volume and Integrity Correlate with Phonological Awareness in Prereading and Early-Reading Kindergarten Children

    Zeynep M. Saygin;Elizabeth S. Norton;David E. Osher;Sara D. Beach

  • Language exposure relates to structural neural connectivity in childhood

    Rachel R Romeo;Rachel R Romeo;Rachel R Romeo;Joshua R. Segaran;Julia Anne Leonard;Sydney T. Robinson

  • Functional Segmentation of the Anterior Limb of the Internal Capsule: Linking White Matter Abnormalities to Specific Connections.

    Ziad Safadi;Giorgia Grisot;Giorgia Grisot;Saad Jbabdi;Timothy E. Behrens;Timothy E. Behrens

  • Associations of cortical thickness and cognition in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls

    Stefan Ehrlich;Stefan Ehrlich;Stefan Brauns;Anastasia Yendiki;Beng Choon Ho

  • Connectome 2.0: Developing the next-generation ultra-high gradient strength human MRI scanner for bridging studies of the micro-, meso- and macro-connectome.

    Susie Yi Huang;Thomas Witzel;Boris Keil;Alina Scholz

  • Brain Events Underlying Episodic Memory Changes in Aging: A Longitudinal Investigation of Structural and Functional Connectivity

    Anders Martin Fjell;Anders Martin Fjell;Markus Handal Sneve;Andreas Berg Storsve;Håkon Grydeland

  • Differences in the right inferior longitudinal fasciculus but no general disruption of white matter tracts in children with autism spectrum disorder

    Kami Koldewyn;Anastasia Yendiki;Sarah Weigelt;Sarah Weigelt;Hyowon Gweon

  • Relationship between structural and functional connectivity change across the adult lifespan: A longitudinal investigation

    Anders Martin Fjell;Anders Martin Fjell;Markus Handal Sneve;Håkon Grydeland;Andreas Berg Storsve

  • Gray matter volume reduction in rostral middle frontal gyrus in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

    Zora Kikinis;J.H. Fallon;Margaret A. Niznikiewicz;Paul Gerard Nestor;Paul Gerard Nestor

  • A connectional hub in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex links areas of emotion and cognitive control.

    Wei Tang;Saad Jbabdi;Ziyi Zhu;Michiel Cottaar

  • Four Deep Brain Stimulation Targets for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Are They Different?

    Suzanne N. Haber;Suzanne N. Haber;Anastasia Yendiki;Saad Jbabdi

  • Tract-based analysis of white matter degeneration in Alzheimer's disease.

    S.-H. Lee;J.-P. Coutu;P. Wilkens;A. Yendiki

  • Accelerated Diffusion Spectrum Imaging with Compressed Sensing using Adaptive Dictionaries

    Berkin Bilgic;Kawin Setsompop;Julien Cohen-Adad;Anastasia Yendiki

  • The COMT Val108/158Met polymorphism and medial temporal lobe volumetry in patients with schizophrenia and healthy adults

    Stefan Ehrlich;Stefan Ehrlich;Eric M. Morrow;Eric M. Morrow;Joshua L. Roffman;Stuart R. Wallace

  • Dementia After Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Coexistence of Multiple Proteinopathies.

    Kimbra Kenney;Diego Iacono;Brian L Edlow;Douglas I Katz;Douglas I Katz

  • Cross-validation of serial optical coherence scanning and diffusion tensor imaging: a study on neural fiber maps in human medulla oblongata.

    Hui Wang;Junfeng Zhu;Martin Reuter;Louis N. Vinke

  • Cumulative Genetic Risk and Prefrontal Activity in Patients With Schizophrenia

    Esther Walton;Jessica Turner;Randy L. Gollub;Dara S. Manoach

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce Fischl
Bruce Fischl Harvard University
Suzanne N. Haber
Suzanne N. Haber University of Rochester Medical Center
Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli
Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli Northeastern University
Diego A. Pizzagalli
Diego A. Pizzagalli Harvard University
Randy L. Gollub
Randy L. Gollub Harvard Medical School
Randy P. Auerbach
Randy P. Auerbach Columbia University
Jean C. Augustinack
Jean C. Augustinack Harvard University
David H. Salat
David H. Salat Harvard University
Stefan G. Hofmann
Stefan G. Hofmann Philipp University of Marburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore neuroscience studies in the USA, it’s valuable to consider related online degrees and career pathways. Programs such as the cheapest online msw programs make pursuing a Master of Social Work more accessible for students looking to combine social services with neurological health.

For those interested in behavioral analysis, a variety of online bcba programs offer specialized training for careers working with individuals with behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders.

If you are aiming for efficiency, consider the 1 year msw programs online that provide a swift pathway into the workforce. Similarly, an accelerated bachelor's degree in psychology is ideal for students eager to begin their careers or pursue advanced neuroscience studies sooner.

By exploring these affordable and accelerated online programs, students can build a flexible educational path that complements or enhances a foundation in neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Anastasia Yendiki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles