World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
9272
World Ranking
5144
National Ranking
2367

Yogesh Rathi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yogesh Rathi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 237 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Yogesh Rathi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yogesh Rathi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yogesh Rathi is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical imaging research, with a particular focus on neuroimaging and brain connectivity. Their body of work spans advanced MRI techniques, tractography, and applications in brain cancer and neurological disorders.

Their main fields of study include Medicine, with a concentration in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Neurology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health. This multidisciplinary approach reflects in the range of topics they address, such as:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Research by Yogesh Rathi has been published in prominent venues, including:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition / Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Human Brain Mapping

Notable recent papers authored by or involving Rathi include:

  • Tractography dissection variability: What happens when 42 groups dissect 14 white matter bundles on the same dataset? (2021, NeuroImage)
  • Individual deviations from normative models of brain structure in a large cross-sectional schizophrenia cohort (2020, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • Deep white matter analysis (DeepWMA): Fast and consistent tractography segmentation (2020, Medical Image Analysis)
  • SlicerDMRI: Diffusion MRI and Tractography Research Software for Brain Cancer Surgery Planning and Visualization (2020, JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics)
  • Cross-scanner and cross-protocol multi-shell diffusion MRI data harmonization: Algorithms and results (2020, NeuroImage)

Frequent collaboration partners of Yogesh Rathi consist of:

  • Lauren J. O'Donnell
  • Fan Zhang
  • Nikos Makris
  • Yuqian Chen
  • Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak

Best Publications

  • Image Segmentation Using Active Contours Driven by the Bhattacharyya Gradient Flow

    O. Michailovich;Y. Rathi;A. Tannenbaum

  • Tracking Deforming Objects Using Particle Filtering for Geometric Active Contours

    Y. Rathi;N. Vaswani;A. Tannenbaum;A. Yezzi

  • Filtered Multitensor Tractography

    James G Malcolm;Martha E Shenton;Yogesh Rathi

  • Limits to anatomical accuracy of diffusion tractography using modern approaches.

    Kurt G. Schilling;Vishwesh Nath;Colin Hansen;Prasanna Parvathaneni

  • The White Matter Query Language: A Novel Approach for Describing Human White Matter Anatomy

    Demian Wassermann;Makris Nikos;Yogesh Rathi;Shenton Martha

  • An anatomically curated fiber clustering white matter atlas for consistent white matter tract parcellation across the lifespan.

    Fan Zhang;Ye Wu;Isaiah Norton;Laura Rigolo

  • The white matter query language: a novel approach for describing human white matter anatomy

    Demian Wassermann;Nikos Makris;Yogesh Rathi;Martha Shenton;Martha Shenton

  • High-resolution in vivo diffusion imaging of the human brain with generalized slice dithered enhanced resolution: Simultaneous multislice (gSlider-SMS)

    Kawin Setsompop;Qiuyun Fan;Jason Stockmann;Berkin Bilgic

  • Spatially Regularized Compressed Sensing for High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging

    Oleg Michailovich;Yogesh Rathi;Sudipto Dolui

  • Functional consequences of neurite orientation dispersion and density in humans across the adult lifespan.

    Arash Nazeri;M. Mallar Chakravarty;David J. Rotenberg;Tarek K. Rajji

  • Individual deviations from normative models of brain structure in a large cross-sectional schizophrenia cohort.

    Jinglei Lv;Jinglei Lv;Maria Di Biase;Maria Di Biase;Robin F. H. Cash;Luca Cocchi

  • Retrospective harmonization of multi-site diffusion MRI data acquired with different acquisition parameters

    Suheyla Cetin Karayumak;Sylvain Bouix;Lipeng Ning;Anthony James

  • White matter abnormalities across the lifespan of schizophrenia: a harmonized multi-site diffusion MRI study

    Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak;Maria A Di Biase;Natalia Chunga;Natalia Chunga;Benjamin Reid

  • Inter-site and inter-scanner diffusion MRI data harmonization

    Hengameh Mirzaalian;Lipeng Ning;Peter Savadjiev;Ofer Pasternak

  • Tractography dissection variability: What happens when 42 groups dissect 14 white matter bundles on the same dataset?

    Kurt G. Schilling;François Rheault;Laurent Petit;Colin B. Hansen

  • A Framework for Image Segmentation Using Shape Models and Kernel Space Shape Priors

    S. Dambreville;Y. Rathi;A. Tannenbaum

  • Particle filtering for geometric active contours with application to tracking moving and deforming objects

    Yogesh Rathi;N. Vaswani;A. Tannenbaum;A. Yezzi

  • Statistical shape analysis using kernel PCA

    Yogesh Rathi;Samuel Dambreville;Allen R. Tannenbaum

  • Automated white matter fiber tract identification in patients with brain tumors.

    Lauren J. O’Donnell;Yannick Suter;Yannick Suter;Laura Rigolo;Pegah Kahali

  • Graph Cut Segmentation with Nonlinear Shape Priors

    J. Malcolm;Y. Rathi;A. Tannenbaum

  • SlicerDMRI: Open Source Diffusion MRI Software for Brain Cancer Research.

    Isaiah Norton;Walid Ibn Essayed;Fan Zhang;Sonia Pujol

  • On Approximation of Orientation Distributions by Means of Spherical Ridgelets

    O. Michailovich;Y. Rathi

  • Multi-site harmonization of diffusion MRI data in a registration framework

    Hengameh Mirzaalian;Lipeng Ning;Peter Savadjiev;Ofer Pasternak

Frequent Co-Authors

Martha E. Shenton
Martha E. Shenton Harvard University
Marek Kubicki
Marek Kubicki Brigham and Women's Hospital
Carl-Fredrik Westin
Carl-Fredrik Westin Brigham and Women's Hospital
Sylvain Bouix
Sylvain Bouix Harvard Medical School
Ofer Pasternak
Ofer Pasternak Brigham and Women's Hospital
Nikos Makris
Nikos Makris Brigham and Women's Hospital
Allen Tannenbaum
Allen Tannenbaum Stony Brook University
Alexandra J. Golby
Alexandra J. Golby Brigham and Women's Hospital
Ron Kikinis
Ron Kikinis Brigham and Women's Hospital
Robert W. McCarley
Robert W. McCarley Harvard Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA opens doors to a range of additional study and career options. As technology continues to evolve, aligning your education with top degrees for the future can ensure your skills remain in high demand. Many students combine Computer Science with fields like data analytics, cybersecurity, or business, broadening their career opportunities.

For those looking to advance quickly, there are streamlined graduate programs; you might consider one of the masters degrees that offer flexibility and a faster route to career advancement. If you’re interested in the pinnacle of academic achievement but cost is a concern, numerous affordable phd programs can be pursued online.

Alternatively, if your goal is leadership in education, explore the fastest edd program online to move quickly into higher education administration. These diverse online pathways allow you to customize your learning and career trajectory to fit your goals in the ever-changing tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Yogesh Rathi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles