World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
80
Citations
27953
World Ranking
1604
National Ranking
788

Randy L. Gollub publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randy L. Gollub sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 220 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Randy L. Gollub D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randy L. Gollub sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Randy L. Gollub is affiliated with Harvard Medical School in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience. Their work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, as well as pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The primary research topics covered by Randy L. Gollub include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Migraine and Headache Studies

Gollub has published frequently in notable venues such as:

  • Journal of Pain
  • NeuroImage
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Neuroinformatics

Their recent scientific papers include:

  • "Distinct thalamocortical network dynamics are associated with the pathophysiology of chronic low back pain," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Reduced tactile acuity in chronic low back pain is linked with structural neuroplasticity in primary somatosensory cortex and is modulated by acupuncture therapy," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Multi-channel attention-fusion neural network for brain age estimation: Accuracy, generality, and interpretation with 16,705 healthy MRIs across lifespan," 2021, Medical Image Analysis
  • "Acupuncture Treatment Modulates the Connectivity of Key Regions of the Descending Pain Modulation and Reward Systems in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain," 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • "Impaired mesocorticolimbic connectivity underlies increased pain sensitivity in chronic low back pain," 2020, NeuroImage

Frequent collaborators of Randy L. Gollub include:

  • Bruce R. Rosen
  • Vitaly Napadow
  • Jian Kong
  • Marco L. Loggia
  • Robert R. Edwards

Best Publications

  • Reproducibility of Quantitative Tractography Methods Applied to Cerebral White Matter

    Setsu Wakana;Arvind Caprihan;Martina M. Panzenboeck;James H. Fallon

  • Acute effects of cocaine on human brain activity and emotion

    Hans C Breiter;Randy L Gollub;Robert M Weisskoff;David N Kennedy

  • Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: Effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data

    Jorge Jovicich;Silvester Czanner;Douglas N. Greve;Elizabeth Haley

  • Functional brain mapping of the relaxation response and meditation.

    Sara W. Lazar;CA George Bush;Randy L. Gollub;Gregory L. Fricchione

  • Acupuncture modulates the limbic system and subcortical gray structures of the human brain: Evidence from fMRI studies in normal subjects

    Kathleen K.S. Hui;Jing Liu;Nikos Makris;Randy L. Gollub

  • Common genetic variants influence human subcortical brain structures.

    Derrek P. Hibar;Jason L. Stein;Jason L. Stein;Miguel E. Renteria;Alejandro Arias-Vasquez

  • The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex

    Katrina L. Grasby;Neda Jahanshad;Jodie N. Painter;Lucía Colodro-Conde

  • The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data

    Paul M. Thompson;Jason L. Stein;Sarah E. Medland;Derrek P. Hibar

  • MRI-derived measurements of human subcortical, ventricular and intracranial brain volumes: Reliability effects of scan sessions, acquisition sequences, data analyses, scanner upgrade, scanner vendors and field strengths

    Jorge Jovicich;Silvester Czanner;Xiao Han;David H. Salat

  • Widespread white matter microstructural differences in schizophrenia across 4322 individuals : results from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia DTI Working Group

    S. Kelly;S. Kelly;N. Jahanshad;A. Zalesky;P. Kochunov

  • Automated probabilistic reconstruction of white-matter pathways in health and disease using an atlas of the underlying anatomy.

    Anastasia Yendiki;Patricia Panneck;Priti Srinivasan;Allison Stevens

  • Schizophrenic subjects show aberrant fMRI activation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia during working memory performance.

    Dara S Manoach;Randy L Gollub;Etienne S Benson;Meghan M Searl

  • Brain Activity Associated with Expectancy-Enhanced Placebo Analgesia as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Jian Kong;Randy L. Gollub;Ilana S. Rosman;J. Megan Webb

  • Acupuncture De Qi, from Qualitative History to Quantitative Measurement

    Jian Kong;Randy Gollub;Tao Huang;Ginger Polich

  • Working memory and DLPFC inefficiency in schizophrenia: The FBIRN study

    S. G. Potkin;J. A. Turner;G. G. Brown;G. McCarthy

  • Nonconscious activation of placebo and nocebo pain responses

    Karin B. Jensen;Karin B. Jensen;Karin B. Jensen;Ted J. Kaptchuk;Irving Kirsch;Irving Kirsch;Jacqueline Raicek

  • Default mode network connectivity encodes clinical pain: An arterial spin labeling study

    Marco Luciano Loggia;Marco Luciano Loggia;Marco Luciano Loggia;Jieun Kim;Randy Lyanne Gollub;Randy Lyanne Gollub;Mark G. Vangel

  • Novel genetic loci associated with hippocampal volume

    Derrek Hibar;Hieab H.H. Adams;Neda Jahanshad;Ganesh Chauhan

  • A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Neural Mechanisms of Hyperalgesic Nocebo Effect

    Jian Kong;Randy L. Gollub;Ginger Polich;Irving Kirsch

  • Using fMRI to dissociate sensory encoding from cognitive evaluation of heat pain intensity.

    Jian Kong;Nathan S. White;Kenneth K. Kwong;Mark G. Vangel

  • Patients With Fibromyalgia Display Less Functional Connectivity In The Brain's Pain Inhibitory Network

    Karin B Jensen;Rita Loitoile;Eva Kosek;Frank Petzke

Frequent Co-Authors

Jian Kong
Jian Kong Harvard University
Vince D. Calhoun
Vince D. Calhoun Georgia State University
Ted J. Kaptchuk
Ted J. Kaptchuk Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Tonya White
Tonya White National Institutes of Health
Bruce R. Rosen
Bruce R. Rosen Harvard University
Vitaly Napadow
Vitaly Napadow Harvard University
Jessica A. Turner
Jessica A. Turner The Ohio State University
Beng-Choon Ho
Beng-Choon Ho University of Iowa
Robert R. Edwards
Robert R. Edwards Brigham and Women's Hospital
Marco L. Loggia
Marco L. Loggia Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying neuroscience, there are several related online degrees that can broaden your expertise and career options. Many students combine neuroscience with psychology, counseling, or social work backgrounds to better understand the brain and behavior from multiple perspectives.

An online master's degree in marriage and family therapy is a popular choice for those interested in therapeutic practices and helping families. Students seeking flexibility might also explore an online psychology degree cheap to begin their journey before specializing.

Graduate programs, such as a masters in psychology, can deepen your skills in mental health, research, and clinical intervention. For social impact careers, consider 1 year msw programs online no bsw. Fast-track MSW options are available even if you do not have a Bachelor of Social Work.

These pathways open doors in academia, healthcare, counseling, or social services—complementing neuroscience with practical and interdisciplinary training.

Best Scientists Citing Randy L. Gollub

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles