World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
36
Citations
5905
World Ranking
2630
National Ranking
1083

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
6184
World Ranking
10228
National Ranking
4296

Robert L. Smith publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Smith sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 147 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Robert L. Smith D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Overview

Robert L. Smith is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans across multiple disciplines with a primary focus on physics and astronomy as well as engineering.

Their work is strongly grounded in the subfields of atomic and molecular physics and optics, electrical and electronic engineering, and materials chemistry, with additional interests in the history and philosophy of science and physical and theoretical chemistry.

Smith's research primarily addresses topics such as molecular junctions and nanostructures, strong light-matter interactions, mechanical and optical resonators, and quantum dots synthesis and properties. There is also coverage of academic writing and publishing, spectroscopy and quantum chemical studies, alongside photochemistry and electron transfer studies.

Key frequent co-authors in Smith's research include:

  • Fabijan Pavošević
  • Ángel Rubio
  • Daniel Claudino
  • Nicholas J. Mayhall

Frequent publication venues for Smith's work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Nature Communications
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Their recent papers include:

  • "Computational study on the catalytic control of endo/exo Diels-Alder reactions by cavity quantum vacuum fluctuations", 2023, Nature Communications
  • "Cavity Click Chemistry: Cavity-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition", 2023, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
  • "Catalysis in Click Chemistry Reactions Controlled by Cavity Quantum Vacuum Fluctuations: The Case of endo/exo Diels-Alder Reaction", 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Cavity Click Chemistry: Cavity-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition", 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

In 2000, Robert L. Smith was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA).

Best Publications

  • Efficient Monte Carlo Procedures for Generating Points Uniformly Distributed over Bounded Regions

    Robert L. Smith

  • FASTEST PATHS IN TIME-DEPENDENT NETWORKS FOR INTELLIGENT VEHICLE-HIGHWAY SYSTEMS APPLICATION∗

    David E. Kaufman;Robert L. Smith

  • Simulated annealing for constrained global optimization

    H. Edwin Romeijn;Robert L. Smith

  • Hit-and-run algorithms for generating multivariate distributions

    Claude J. P. Bélisle;H. Edwin Romeijn;Robert L. Smith

  • Direction Choice for Accelerated Convergence in Hit-And-Run Sampling

    David E. Kaufman;Robert L. Smith

  • Pure adaptive search in global optimization

    Zelda B. Zabinsky;Robert L. Smith

  • Capacity expansion under stochastic demands

    James C. Bean;Julia L. Higle;Robert L. Smith

  • Improving Hit-and-Run for Global Optimization*

    Zelda B. Zabinsky;Robert L. Smith;J. Fred McDonald;H. Edwin Romeijn

  • Conditions for the Existence of Planning Horizons

    James C. Bean;Robert L. Smith

  • A Fictitious Play Approach to Large-Scale Optimization

    Theodore J. Lambert;Marina A. Epelman;Robert L. Smith

  • Hit-and-run algorithms for the identification of nonredundant linear inequalities

    H. C. P. Berbee;C. G. E. Boender;A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan;C. L. Scheffer

  • Aggregation in Dynamic Programming

    James C. Bean;John R. Birge;Robert L. Smith

  • A Dynamic Infinite Horizon Replacement Economy Decision Model

    James C. Bean;Jack R. Lohmann;Robert L. Smith

  • FICTITIOUS PLAY FOR FINDING SYSTEM OPTIMAL ROUTINGS IN DYNAMIC TRAFFIC NETWORKS

    Alfredo Garcia;Daniel Reaume;Robert L. Smith

  • Pure adaptive search in Monte Carlo optimization

    N. R. Patel;R. L. Smith;Z. B. Zabinsky

  • An iterative routing/assignment method for anticipatory real-time route guidance

    D.E. Kaufman;R.L. Smith;K.E. Wunderlich

  • A new optimality criterion for nonhomogeneous Markov decision processes

    Wallace J. Hopp;James C. Bean;Robert L. Smith

  • Equipment replacement under technological change

    James C. Bean;Jack R. Lohmann;Robert L. Smith

  • Rolling horizon procedures in nonhomogeneous Markov decision processes

    Jeffrey M. Alden;Robert L. Smith

  • Approximating Shortest Paths in Large-Scale Networks with An Application to Intelligent Transportation Systems

    Yu-Li Chou;H. Edwin Romeijn;Robert L. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

H. Edwin Romeijn
H. Edwin Romeijn Georgia Institute of Technology
Donald E. Brown
Donald E. Brown University of Virginia
Raja Sengupta
Raja Sengupta University of California, Berkeley
John R. Birge
John R. Birge University of Chicago
Stéphane Lafortune
Stéphane Lafortune University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Aharon Ben-Tal
Aharon Ben-Tal Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Nicholas W. Lukacs
Nicholas W. Lukacs University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Wallace J. Hopp
Wallace J. Hopp University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Cory M. Hogaboam
Cory M. Hogaboam Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Candace Arai Yano
Candace Arai Yano University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring complementary online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many professionals combine math skills with business knowledge by pursuing an fastest online mba programs, which accelerate leadership roles in finance, consulting, or management.

Those interested in the business administration side may also consider the cheapest online dba options. This path offers advanced expertise in organizational strategy and research, perfect for mathematically driven individuals aiming for executive or academic careers.

Another lucrative possibility is earning an online masters in finance. This degree blends quantitative skills with financial theory, ideal for roles in investment banking, risk management, and financial analysis.

For those leaning toward marketing and tech, an ms in digital marketing degree cost usa program enables a math background to be applied in data-driven digital marketing strategies, enhancing career prospects in emerging digital economies.

Best Scientists Citing Robert L. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles