World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 85 1359 1234 683 606 294 19938

Jian Kong publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jian Kong between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jian Kong published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 15.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2019. 21 of the 466 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2019. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 38 publications 2018: 35 publications 2019: 49 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 12 publications
1996 2025

466 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jian Kong: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 5
2001 5
2002 10
2003 4
2004 6
2005 6
2006 6
2007 8
2008 10
2009 9
2010 15
2011 17
2012 19
2013 34
2014 20
2015 26
2016 33
2017 38
2018 35
2019 49
2020 34
2021 34
2022 6
2023 12
2024 9
2025 12
Total 466
Download as CSV

Jian Kong publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jian Kong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 288–297 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 294 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116 294
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Jian Kong D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jian Kong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100 85
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jian Kong is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience. Their work spans multiple subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, neurology, complementary and alternative medicine, and physiology.

Their research focuses on a range of topics with a notable emphasis on pain management and placebo effect, acupuncture treatment studies, and psychosomatic disorders and their treatments. Other key areas of investigation include functional brain connectivity, pain mechanisms and treatments, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.

Jian Kong's recent notable papers include the following:

  • Meta-analysis of neural systems underlying placebo analgesia from individual participant fMRI data, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) for migraine: an fMRI study, 2020, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
  • Distinct thalamocortical network dynamics are associated with the pathophysiology of chronic low back pain, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Reduced tactile acuity in chronic low back pain is linked with structural neuroplasticity in primary somatosensory cortex and is modulated by acupuncture therapy, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Acupuncture Treatment Modulates the Connectivity of Key Regions of the Descending Pain Modulation and Reward Systems in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain, 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine

Frequent collaborators in their research include Georgia Wilson, Sierra Hodges, Jin Cao, Yiting Huang, and Valeria Saccà. These partnerships have contributed to a significant body of work.

Jian Kong has published extensively in several academic venues, with the most frequent publication outlets being NeuroImage, PubMed, Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface, Nature Communications, and the Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Best Publications

  • A Randomized Trial Comparing Telemedicine Case Management with Usual Care in Older, Ethnically Diverse, Medically Underserved Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: 5 Year Results of the IDEATel Study

    Steven Shea;Ruth S. Weinstock;Ruth S. Weinstock;Jeanne A. Teresi;Jeanne A. Teresi;Walter Palmas

  • Brain Activity Associated with Expectancy-Enhanced Placebo Analgesia as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Jian Kong;Randy L. Gollub;Ilana S. Rosman;J. Megan Webb

  • Acupuncture De Qi, from Qualitative History to Quantitative Measurement

    Jian Kong;Randy Gollub;Tao Huang;Ginger Polich

  • The salient characteristics of the central effects of acupuncture needling: Limbic‐paralimbic‐neocortical network modulation

    Jiliang Fang;Zhen Jin;Yin Wang;Ke Li

  • Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation modulates default mode network in major depressive disorder.

    Jiliang Fang;Peijing Rong;Yang Hong;Yangyang Fan

  • Nonconscious activation of placebo and nocebo pain responses

    Karin B. Jensen;Karin B. Jensen;Karin B. Jensen;Ted J. Kaptchuk;Irving Kirsch;Irving Kirsch;Jacqueline Raicek

  • Default mode network connectivity encodes clinical pain: An arterial spin labeling study

    Marco Luciano Loggia;Marco Luciano Loggia;Marco Luciano Loggia;Jieun Kim;Randy Lyanne Gollub;Randy Lyanne Gollub;Mark G. Vangel

  • A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Neural Mechanisms of Hyperalgesic Nocebo Effect

    Jian Kong;Randy L. Gollub;Ginger Polich;Irving Kirsch

  • Using fMRI to dissociate sensory encoding from cognitive evaluation of heat pain intensity.

    Jian Kong;Nathan S. White;Kenneth K. Kwong;Mark G. Vangel

  • Patients With Fibromyalgia Display Less Functional Connectivity In The Brain's Pain Inhibitory Network

    Karin B Jensen;Rita Loitoile;Eva Kosek;Frank Petzke

  • Exploring the brain in pain: activations, deactivations and their relation

    Jian Kong;Marco L. Loggia;Marco L. Loggia;Marco L. Loggia;Carolyn Zyloney;Peichi Tu

  • The neural substrate of arithmetic operations and procedure complexity

    Jian Kong;Chunmao Wang;Kenneth Kwong;Mark Vangel

  • Overlapping structural and functional brain changes in patients with long-term exposure to fibromyalgia pain

    Karin B. Jensen;Priti Srinivasan;Rosa Spaeth;Ying Tan;Ying Tan

  • Correction of the disease phenotype in the mouse model of Stargardt disease by lentiviral gene therapy.

    J. Kong;S.-R. Kim;K. Binley;I. Pata

  • Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on major depressive disorder: A nonrandomized controlled pilot study.

    Peijing Rong;Jun Liu;Liping Wang;Rupeng Liu

  • Psychophysical outcomes from a randomized pilot study of manual, electro, and sham acupuncture treatment on experimentally induced thermal pain.

    Jian Kong;Duretti T. Fufa;Andrew J. Gerber;Ilana S. Rosman

  • A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain during manual and electroacupuncture stimulation of acupuncture point (LI-4 Hegu) in normal subjects reveals differential brain activation between methods.

    Jian Kong;Lin Ma;Randy L. Gollub;Jinghan Wei

  • Disrupted functional connectivity of the periaqueductal gray in chronic low back pain

    Rongjun Yu;Randy L. Gollub;Rosa Spaeth;Vitaly Napadow

  • Meditation's impact on default mode network and hippocampus in mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study.

    Rebecca Erwin Wells;Gloria Y. Yeh;Catherine E. Kerr;Jennifer Wolkin

  • Inserting Needles Into the Body: A Meta-Analysis of Brain Activity Associated With Acupuncture Needle Stimulation

    Younbyoung Chae;Younbyoung Chae;Dong Seon Chang;Dong Seon Chang;Soon Ho Lee;Won Mo Jung

  • Intrinsic functional connectivity of the periaqueductal gray, a resting fMRI study

    Jian Kong;Pei-chi Tu;Pei-chi Tu;Carolyn Zyloney;Tung-ping Su;Tung-ping Su

Frequent Co-Authors

Randy L. Gollub
Randy L. Gollub Harvard Medical School
Ted J. Kaptchuk
Ted J. Kaptchuk Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Vitaly Napadow
Vitaly Napadow Harvard University
Bruce R. Rosen
Bruce R. Rosen Harvard University
Peter Gouras
Peter Gouras Columbia University
Robert R. Edwards
Robert R. Edwards Brigham and Women's Hospital
Irving Kirsch
Irving Kirsch Harvard University
Marco L. Loggia
Marco L. Loggia Harvard University
Rando Allikmets
Rando Allikmets Columbia University
Jason P. Jue
Jason P. Jue The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jian Kong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles