World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 63 3375 3087 294 274 197 15755

Ulrike Bingel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ulrike Bingel between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ulrike Bingel published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2025. 30 of the 280 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2025. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 29 publications 2026: 1 publication
1998 2026

280 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ulrike Bingel: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 2
2005 3
2006 3
2007 3
2008 6
2009 8
2010 9
2011 21
2012 13
2013 18
2014 13
2015 12
2016 12
2017 16
2018 5
2019 14
2020 12
2021 18
2022 16
2023 22
2024 19
2025 29
2026 1
Total 280
Download as CSV

Ulrike Bingel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrike Bingel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 188–197 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 197 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302 197
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Ulrike Bingel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrike Bingel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260 63
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Ulrike Bingel is affiliated with the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience and related subfields such as psychiatry and mental health, physiology, complementary and alternative medicine, and pharmacology.

Their work extensively covers topics related to pain management and placebo effects, pain mechanisms and treatments, complementary and alternative medicine studies, empathy and medical education, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, functional brain connectivity studies, and pediatric pain management techniques.

Recent publications by Ulrike Bingel include:

  • Meta-analysis of neural systems underlying placebo analgesia from individual participant fMRI data, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Multivariate BWAS can be replicable with moderate sample sizes, 2023, Nature
  • Pain-free resting-state functional brain connectivity predicts individual pain sensitivity, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Placebo 2.0: the impact of expectations on analgesic treatment outcome, 2020, Pain
  • What Should Clinicians Tell Patients about Placebo and Nocebo Effects? Practical Considerations Based on Expert Consensus, 2020, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Co-authorship patterns indicate frequent collaboration with a set of researchers including Tamás Spisák, Katharina Schmidt, Julian Kleine-Borgmann, Bálint Kincses, and Katja Wiech. These partnerships have contributed to a substantial number of publications across several domains.

Ulrike Bingel's publishing venues reflect a focus on both specialized and broad scientific audiences. The most common venues include:

  • Pain
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Der Schmerz
  • Scientific Reports

The scientist has also contributed to scholarly books, notably through a publication with Springer Nature titled "Der Placebo-Effekt," scheduled for release in 2025.

Overall, the research scope of Ulrike Bingel centers on understanding pain regulation processes, the neurological basis of placebo effects, and the development of therapeutic and clinical applications based on these insights. The integration of functional brain connectivity and clinical outcomes forms a key area of their work, positioning this scientist within the interdisciplinary interface of neuroscience, medicine, and psychology.

Best Publications

  • Activation of the Opioidergic Descending Pain Control System Underlies Placebo Analgesia

    Falk Eippert;Ulrike Bingel;Eszter D. Schoell;Juliana Yacubian

  • The Effect of Treatment Expectation on Drug Efficacy: Imaging the Analgesic Benefit of the Opioid Remifentanil

    Ulrike Bingel;Ulrike Bingel;Vishvarani Wanigasekera;Katja Wiech;Roisin Ni Mhuircheartaigh

  • The placebo response in medicine: minimize, maximize or personalize?

    Paul Enck;Ulrike Bingel;Manfred Schedlowski;Winfried Rief

  • Mechanisms of placebo analgesia: rACC recruitment of a subcortical antinociceptive network.

    U. Bingel;J. Lorenz;E. Schoell;C. Weiller

  • Direct Evidence for Spinal Cord Involvement in Placebo Analgesia

    Falk Eippert;Jürgen Finsterbusch;Ulrike Bingel;Christian Büchel

  • Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus.

    Andrea W M Evers;Luana Colloca;Charlotte Blease;Marco Annoni

  • Anterior Insula Integrates Information about Salience into Perceptual Decisions about Pain

    Katja Wiech;Chia Shu Lin;Kay H. Brodersen;Ulrike Bingel;Ulrike Bingel

  • Imaging CNS Modulation of Pain in Humans

    Ulrike Bingel;Ulrike Bingel;Irene Tracey

  • Neuro-Bio-Behavioral Mechanisms of Placebo and Nocebo Responses: Implications for Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice

    Manfred Schedlowski;Paul Enck;Winfried Rief;Ulrike Bingel

  • Habituation to painful stimulation involves the antinociceptive system.

    U. Bingel;E. Schoell;W. Herken;C. Büchel

  • Subcortical structures involved in pain processing: evidence from single-trial fMRI.

    U Bingel;M Quante;R Knab;B Bromm

  • Placebo analgesia: Psychological and neurobiological mechanisms

    Luana Colloca;Regine Klinger;Herta Flor;Ulrike Bingel

  • Prestimulus functional connectivity determines pain perception in humans

    Markus Ploner;Michael C. Lee;Katja Wiech;Ulrike Bingel

  • Changes in brain gray matter due to repetitive painful stimulation.

    S. Teutsch;W. Herken;Ulrike Bingel;Eszter D. Schoell

  • Attention Modulates Spinal Cord Responses to Pain

    Christian Sprenger;Falk Eippert;Jürgen Finsterbusch;Ulrike Bingel

  • Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement

    C. Shawn Green;Daphne Bavelier;Arthur F. Kramer;Arthur F. Kramer;Sophia Vinogradov

  • Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome Have Altered Emotional Modulation of Neural Responses to Visceral Stimuli

    Sigrid Elsenbruch;Christina Rosenberger;Ulrike Bingel;Michael Forsting

  • The Placebo Effect: Advances from Different Methodological Approaches

    Karin Meissner;Ulrike Bingel;Luana Colloca;Tor D. Wager

  • Somatotopic organization of human somatosensory cortices for pain: a single trial fMRI study.

    U. Bingel;J. Lorenz;Volkmar Glauche;René Knab

  • Avoiding Nocebo Effects to Optimize Treatment Outcome

    Ulrike Bingel

  • Supplementary Materials for The Effect of Treatment Expectation on Drug Efficacy: Imaging the Analgesic Benefit of the Opioid Remifentanil

    Ulrike Bingel;Vishvarani Wanigasekera;Katja Wiech;Roisin Ni Mhuircheartaigh

Frequent Co-Authors

Katja Wiech
Katja Wiech University of Oxford
Sigrid Elsenbruch
Sigrid Elsenbruch Ruhr University Bochum
Markus Ploner
Markus Ploner Technical University of Munich
Manfred Schedlowski
Manfred Schedlowski University of Duisburg-Essen
Christian Büchel
Christian Büchel University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Irene Tracey
Irene Tracey University of Oxford
Michael Forsting
Michael Forsting University of Duisburg-Essen
Tor D. Wager
Tor D. Wager Dartmouth College
Elke R. Gizewski
Elke R. Gizewski Innsbruck Medical University
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ulrike Bingel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles