World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
63
Citations
15755
World Ranking
3375
National Ranking
294

Ulrike Bingel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrike Bingel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 197 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ulrike Bingel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrike Bingel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrike Bingel is affiliated with the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience and related subfields such as psychiatry and mental health, physiology, complementary and alternative medicine, and pharmacology.

Their work extensively covers topics related to pain management and placebo effects, pain mechanisms and treatments, complementary and alternative medicine studies, empathy and medical education, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, functional brain connectivity studies, and pediatric pain management techniques.

Recent publications by Ulrike Bingel include:

  • Meta-analysis of neural systems underlying placebo analgesia from individual participant fMRI data, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Multivariate BWAS can be replicable with moderate sample sizes, 2023, Nature
  • Pain-free resting-state functional brain connectivity predicts individual pain sensitivity, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Placebo 2.0: the impact of expectations on analgesic treatment outcome, 2020, Pain
  • What Should Clinicians Tell Patients about Placebo and Nocebo Effects? Practical Considerations Based on Expert Consensus, 2020, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Co-authorship patterns indicate frequent collaboration with a set of researchers including Tamás Spisák, Katharina Schmidt, Julian Kleine-Borgmann, Bálint Kincses, and Katja Wiech. These partnerships have contributed to a substantial number of publications across several domains.

Ulrike Bingel's publishing venues reflect a focus on both specialized and broad scientific audiences. The most common venues include:

  • Pain
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Der Schmerz
  • Scientific Reports

The scientist has also contributed to scholarly books, notably through a publication with Springer Nature titled "Der Placebo-Effekt," scheduled for release in 2025.

Overall, the research scope of Ulrike Bingel centers on understanding pain regulation processes, the neurological basis of placebo effects, and the development of therapeutic and clinical applications based on these insights. The integration of functional brain connectivity and clinical outcomes forms a key area of their work, positioning this scientist within the interdisciplinary interface of neuroscience, medicine, and psychology.

Best Publications

  • Activation of the Opioidergic Descending Pain Control System Underlies Placebo Analgesia

    Falk Eippert;Ulrike Bingel;Eszter D. Schoell;Juliana Yacubian

  • The Effect of Treatment Expectation on Drug Efficacy: Imaging the Analgesic Benefit of the Opioid Remifentanil

    Ulrike Bingel;Ulrike Bingel;Vishvarani Wanigasekera;Katja Wiech;Roisin Ni Mhuircheartaigh

  • The placebo response in medicine: minimize, maximize or personalize?

    Paul Enck;Ulrike Bingel;Manfred Schedlowski;Winfried Rief

  • Mechanisms of placebo analgesia: rACC recruitment of a subcortical antinociceptive network.

    U. Bingel;J. Lorenz;E. Schoell;C. Weiller

  • Direct Evidence for Spinal Cord Involvement in Placebo Analgesia

    Falk Eippert;Jürgen Finsterbusch;Ulrike Bingel;Christian Büchel

  • Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus.

    Andrea W M Evers;Luana Colloca;Charlotte Blease;Marco Annoni

  • Anterior Insula Integrates Information about Salience into Perceptual Decisions about Pain

    Katja Wiech;Chia Shu Lin;Kay H. Brodersen;Ulrike Bingel;Ulrike Bingel

  • Imaging CNS Modulation of Pain in Humans

    Ulrike Bingel;Ulrike Bingel;Irene Tracey

  • Neuro-Bio-Behavioral Mechanisms of Placebo and Nocebo Responses: Implications for Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice

    Manfred Schedlowski;Paul Enck;Winfried Rief;Ulrike Bingel

  • Habituation to painful stimulation involves the antinociceptive system.

    U. Bingel;E. Schoell;W. Herken;C. Büchel

  • Subcortical structures involved in pain processing: evidence from single-trial fMRI.

    U Bingel;M Quante;R Knab;B Bromm

  • Placebo analgesia: Psychological and neurobiological mechanisms

    Luana Colloca;Regine Klinger;Herta Flor;Ulrike Bingel

  • Prestimulus functional connectivity determines pain perception in humans

    Markus Ploner;Michael C. Lee;Katja Wiech;Ulrike Bingel

  • Changes in brain gray matter due to repetitive painful stimulation.

    S. Teutsch;W. Herken;Ulrike Bingel;Eszter D. Schoell

  • Attention Modulates Spinal Cord Responses to Pain

    Christian Sprenger;Falk Eippert;Jürgen Finsterbusch;Ulrike Bingel

  • Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement

    C. Shawn Green;Daphne Bavelier;Arthur F. Kramer;Arthur F. Kramer;Sophia Vinogradov

  • Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome Have Altered Emotional Modulation of Neural Responses to Visceral Stimuli

    Sigrid Elsenbruch;Christina Rosenberger;Ulrike Bingel;Michael Forsting

  • The Placebo Effect: Advances from Different Methodological Approaches

    Karin Meissner;Ulrike Bingel;Luana Colloca;Tor D. Wager

  • Somatotopic organization of human somatosensory cortices for pain: a single trial fMRI study.

    U. Bingel;J. Lorenz;Volkmar Glauche;René Knab

  • Avoiding Nocebo Effects to Optimize Treatment Outcome

    Ulrike Bingel

  • Supplementary Materials for The Effect of Treatment Expectation on Drug Efficacy: Imaging the Analgesic Benefit of the Opioid Remifentanil

    Ulrike Bingel;Vishvarani Wanigasekera;Katja Wiech;Roisin Ni Mhuircheartaigh

Frequent Co-Authors

Katja Wiech
Katja Wiech University of Oxford
Sigrid Elsenbruch
Sigrid Elsenbruch Ruhr University Bochum
Markus Ploner
Markus Ploner Technical University of Munich
Manfred Schedlowski
Manfred Schedlowski University of Duisburg-Essen
Christian Büchel
Christian Büchel University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Irene Tracey
Irene Tracey University of Oxford
Michael Forsting
Michael Forsting University of Duisburg-Essen
Tor D. Wager
Tor D. Wager Dartmouth College
Elke R. Gizewski
Elke R. Gizewski Innsbruck Medical University
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ulrike Bingel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles