World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
12669
World Ranking
8176
National Ranking
3504

Jason P. Jue publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason P. Jue sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 273 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jason P. Jue D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason P. Jue sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jason P. Jue is affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within computer science and engineering, with significant contributions to network technologies and communications.

The primary fields of study for Jason P. Jue are:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

The main subfields of study within these areas include:

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Information Systems

Their research topics cover these key areas:

  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Advanced Optical Network Technologies
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Advanced Photonic Communication Systems
  • Optical Network Technologies
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Network Traffic and Congestion Control

Recent publications by Jason P. Jue reflect a focus on network slicing, optical networks, and reinforcement learning approaches in communications:

  • DeepPR: Progressive Recovery for Interdependent VNFs With Deep Reinforcement Learning, 2020, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
  • Availability-guaranteed slice composition for service function chains in 5G transport networks, 2020, Journal of Optical Communications and Networking
  • Low-latency partial resource offloading in cloud-edge elastic optical networks, 2023, Journal of Optical Communications and Networking
  • A Reinforcement Learning-Based Admission Control Strategy for Elastic Network Slices, 2021, 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)
  • Reinforcement Learning-Based Network Slice Resource Allocation for Federated Learning Applications, 2022, GLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference

Frequent co-authors in their published research include:

  • Genya Ishigaki
  • Riti Gour
  • Zhouxiang Wu
  • Siddartha Devic
  • Bowen Chen

Publications are often found in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Optical Communications and Networking
  • 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)
  • ICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Communications
  • IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications

Best Publications

  • A Review of Routing and Wavelength Assignment Approaches for Wavelength- Routed Optical WDM Networks

    Hui Zang;Jason P. Jue;Biswanath Mukherjee

  • All one needs to know about fog computing and related edge computing paradigms: A complete survey

    Ashkan Yousefpour;Caleb Fung;Tam Nguyen;Krishna Kadiyala

  • On Reducing IoT Service Delay via Fog Offloading

    Ashkan Yousefpour;Genya Ishigaki;Riti Gour;Jason P. Jue

  • Burst segmentation: an approach for reducing packet loss in optical burst switched networks

    V.M. Vokkarane;J.P. Jue;S. Sitaraman

  • Dynamic lightpath establishment in wavelength routed WDM networks

    Hui Zang;J.P. Jue;L. Sahasrabuddhe;R. Ramamurthy

  • Optical components for WDM lightwave networks

    M.S. Borella;J.P. Jue;D. Banerjee;B. Ramamurthy

  • Fog Computing: Towards Minimizing Delay in the Internet of Things

    Ashkan Yousefpour;Genya Ishigaki;Jason P. Jue

  • Prioritized burst segmentation and composite burst-assembly techniques for QoS support in optical burst-switched networks

    V.M. Vokkarane;J.P. Jue

  • Survivable transparent Flexible optical WDM (FWDM) networks

    Ankitkumar N. Patel;Philip N. Ji;Jason P. Jue;Ting Wang

  • Threshold-based burst assembly policies for QoS support in optical burst-switched networks

    Vinod Mandayam Vokkarane;Karthik Haridoss;Jason P. Jue

  • FOGPLAN: A Lightweight QoS-Aware Dynamic Fog Service Provisioning Framework

    Ashkan Yousefpour;Ashish Patil;Genya Ishigaki;Inwoong Kim

  • Optical Burst Switched Networks

    Jason P. Jue;Vinod M. Vokkarane

  • Defragmentation of transparent Flexible optical WDM (FWDM) networks

    Ankitkumar N. Patel;Philip N. Ji;Jason P. Jue;Ting Wang

  • Early drop scheme for providing absolute QoS differentiation in optical burst-switched networks

    Qiong Zhang;V.M. Vokkarane;Biao Chen;J.P. Jue

  • Generalized burst assembly and scheduling techniques for QoS support in optical burst-switched networks

    V.M. Vokkarane;Qiong Zhang;J.P. Jue;Biao Chen

  • Absolute QoS differentiation in optical burst-switched networks

    Qiong Zhang;V.M. Vokkarane;J.P. Jue;Biao Chen

  • Dynamic congestion-based load balanced routing in optical burst-switched networks

    G.R.V. Thodime;V.M. Vokkarane;J.P. Jue

  • Traffic Grooming in Green Optical Networks

    M. M. Hasan;F. Farahmand;A. N. Patel;J. P. Jue

  • Minimum-color path problems for reliability in mesh networks

    S. Yuan;S. Varma;J.P. Jue

  • Prioritized routing and burst segmentation for QoS in optical burst-switched networks

    V.M. Vokkarane;J.P. Jue

Frequent Co-Authors

Vinod M. Vokkarane
Vinod M. Vokkarane University of Massachusetts Lowell
Ting Wang
Ting Wang Washington University in St. Louis
Biswanath Mukherjee
Biswanath Mukherjee University of California, Davis
Kejie Lu
Kejie Lu University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez
Jian Kong
Jian Kong Harvard University
Qiong Zhang
Qiong Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues
Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues Federal University of Piauí
Imrich Chlamtac
Imrich Chlamtac European Alliance for Innovation
Gaoxi Xiao
Gaoxi Xiao Nanyang Technological University
Hui Yang
Hui Yang Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can expand your Computer Science career options and provide flexibility. Many professionals choose to study at the most respected online university to gain recognized credentials without needing to relocate.

Students interested in creative or tech-driven careers often consider a game development degree. This program combines programming skills with design principles, preparing graduates for a growing industry.

As online threats rise, a cyber security bachelor degree online is increasingly valuable. This pathway focuses on digital safety, offering strong job prospects in both public and private sectors.

For those interested in project leadership, a construction management degree can combine technology and management skills. This is ideal for students planning to work with large-scale infrastructure or tech-enabled construction projects.

Best Scientists Citing Jason P. Jue

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles