World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10775 10088 5635 5146 80 6384

Rodney R. Funk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rodney R. Funk between 1998 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rodney R. Funk published across 24 years, from 1998 to 2021, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2014. 7 of the 84 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2014. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 1 publication
1998 2021

84 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rodney R. Funk: publications per year, 1998 to 2021
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 3
2002 4
2003 3
2004 5
2005 3
2006 3
2007 5
2008 8
2009 5
2010 3
2011 2
2012 3
2013 4
2014 10
2015 4
2016 4
2017 3
2018 0
2019 3
2020 6
2021 1
Total 84
Download as CSV

Rodney R. Funk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodney R. Funk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 80
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rodney R. Funk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodney R. Funk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rodney R. Funk is affiliated with Chestnut Health Systems in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on substance abuse treatment and related health outcomes, with a particular emphasis on opioid use disorder and prenatal substance exposure effects.

The scientist's work spans several main fields of study including Medicine and Health Professions.

  • Epidemiology
  • General Health Professions
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Key topics covered in their research include substance abuse treatment and outcomes, opioid use disorder treatment, prenatal substance exposure effects, health policy implementation science, and community health and development.

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Community Health and Development

Rodney R. Funk has authored several peer-reviewed papers, including:

  • "Trends and age-related disparities in opioid use disorder treatment admissions for adolescents and young adults," 2021, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • "Substance use prevention services in juvenile justice and behavioral health: results from a national survey," 2020, Health & Justice

Their frequent co-authors comprise a range of researchers involved in substance abuse and public health fields, including Justine W. Welsh, Michael L. Dennis, Maggie J. Mataczynski, Mark D. Godley, and Hannah K. Knudsen.

  • Justine W. Welsh
  • Michael L. Dennis
  • Maggie J. Mataczynski
  • Mark D. Godley
  • Hannah K. Knudsen

The scientist has published in prominent venues such as the Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment and Health & Justice, reflecting their engagement with research communities focused on substance use treatment and health justice topics.

  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Health & Justice

Best Publications

  • The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: main findings from two randomized trials.

    Michael Dennis;Susan H. Godley;Guy Diamond;Guy Diamond;Frank M. Tims

  • Prevalence and comorbidity of major internalizing and externalizing problems among adolescents and adults presenting to substance abuse treatment

    Ya-Fen Chan;Michael L. Dennis;Rodney R. Funk

  • Development and Validation of the GAIN Short Screener (GSS) for Internalizing, Externalizing and Substance Use Disorders and Crime/Violence Problems Among Adolescents and Adults

    Michael L. Dennis;Ya Fen Chan;Rodney R. Funk

  • The duration and correlates of addiction and treatment careers

    Michael L. Dennis;Christy K. Scott;Rodney Funk;Mark A. Foss

  • Preliminary outcomes from the assertive continuing care experiment for adolescents discharged from residential treatment

    Mark D Godley;Susan H Godley;Michael L Dennis;Rodney Funk

  • An experimental evaluation of recovery management checkups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders.

    Michael Dennis;Christy K Scott;Rod Funk

  • The effect of assertive continuing care on continuing care linkage, adherence and abstinence following residential treatment for adolescents with substance use disorders.

    Mark D. Godley;Susan H. Godley;Michael L. Dennis;Rodney R. Funk

  • Cross-validation of the alcohol and cannabis use measures in the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) and Timeline Followback (TLFB; Form 90) among adolescents in substance abuse treatment

    Michael L. Dennis;Rodney Funk;Susan Harrington Godley;Mark D. Godley

  • Characteristics and problems of 600 adolescent cannabis abusers in outpatient treatment.

    Frank M. Tims;Michael L. Dennis;Nancy Hamilton;Betty J. Buchan

  • Surviving drug addiction: the effect of treatment and abstinence on mortality

    Christy K. Scott;Michael L. Dennis;Alexandre Laudet;Rodney R. Funk

  • The stability and impact of environmental factors on substance use and problems after adolescent outpatient treatment for cannabis abuse or dependence.

    Mark D. Godley;Jeffrey H. Kahn;Michael L. Dennis;Susan H. Godley

  • Working alliance, treatment satisfaction, and patterns of posttreatment use among adolescent substance users.

    Brooke T. Tetzlaff;Jeffrey H. Kahn;Susan H. Godley;Mark D. Godley

  • Gender differences in victimization severity and outcomes among adolescents treated for substance abuse.

    Janet C. Titus;Michael L. Dennis;William L. White;Christy K. Scott

  • Adolescent outpatient treatment and continuing care: Main findings from a randomized clinical trial ☆

    Susan H. Godley;Bryan R. Garner;Lora L. Passetti;Rodney R. Funk

  • Consumer satisfaction of parents and their children with child/adolescent mental health services

    Susan Harrington Godley;Elisa Mustari Fiedler;Rodney R. Funk

  • A Pilot Study to Examine the Feasibility and Potential Effectiveness of Using Smartphones to Provide Recovery Support for Adolescents.

    Michael L. Dennis;Christy K. Scott;Rodney R. Funk;Lisa Nicholson

  • Combining psychometric and biometric measures of substance use

    Richard Lennox;Michael L. Dennis;Christy K Scott;Rod Funk

  • A randomized trial of assertive continuing care and contingency management for adolescents with substance use disorders.

    Mark D. Godley;Susan H. Godley;Michael L. Dennis;Rodney R. Funk

  • Maltreatment issues by level of adolescent substance abuse treatment: the extent of the problem at intake and relationship to early outcomes.

    Rodney R. Funk;Melissa Mcdermeit;Susan H. Godley;Loree Adams

  • Exposure to Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach treatment procedures as a mediator of the relationship between adolescent substance abuse treatment retention and outcome.

    Bryan R. Garner;Susan H. Godley;Rodney R. Funk;Michael L. Dennis

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael L. Dennis
Michael L. Dennis Research Triangle Park Foundation
Mark D. Godley
Mark D. Godley Chestnut Health Systems
Susan H. Godley
Susan H. Godley University of Miami
Christy K. Scott
Christy K. Scott Chestnut Health Systems
Christine E. Grella
Christine E. Grella University of California, Los Angeles
Michael T. French
Michael T. French University of Miami
Jane Ellen Smith
Jane Ellen Smith University of New Mexico
Jeffrey H. Kahn
Jeffrey H. Kahn Illinois State University
Alexandre B. Laudet
Alexandre B. Laudet National Development and Research Institutes
Nancy M. Petry
Nancy M. Petry University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to a variety of impactful career paths, one of the most popular being substance abuse counseling. As the need for mental health professionals rises, so does interest in specialized roles like substance abuse counselors. Many students are choosing Corpus Christi substance abuse counselor certification requirements as a starting point to understand the region-specific licensing and education needed for this rewarding field.

Requirements vary significantly by location. For example, those interested in working in urban centers might explore substance abuse counselor requirements in Dallas or learn about the process of becoming a substance abuse counselor in Denver. These resources outline prerequisite degrees, supervised experience hours, and exams. Similarly, aspiring counselors in Michigan should review the steps for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Detroit.

Many accredited online programs offer flexibility for those balancing education with existing commitments. Exploring these and understanding local requirements is essential for anyone considering a career in substance abuse counseling or related psychological fields.

Best Scientists Citing Rodney R. Funk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles