World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
107
Citations
43240
World Ranking
1014
National Ranking
614

Psychology

D-Index
110
Citations
44866
World Ranking
399
National Ranking
254

Medicine

D-Index
110
Citations
44789
World Ranking
5562
National Ranking
2995

Nancy M. Petry publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy M. Petry sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 426 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nancy M. Petry D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy M. Petry sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nancy M. Petry was affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research primarily focused on fields related to psychology and clinical psychology, with particular attention to gambling behavior and treatments.

The scientist contributed to the body of knowledge through publications in recognized venues. One notable recent paper is titled Problem Gambling, published in 2023 in the PsycTHERAPY Dataset.

  • Problem Gambling (2023), PsycTHERAPY Dataset

Their main fields of study included:

  • Psychology

and within the subfields:

  • Clinical Psychology

The research topics addressed by this scientist encompassed:

  • Gambling Behavior and Treatments

Their work appeared primarily in the following publication venue:

  • PsycTHERAPY Dataset

Best Publications

  • Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls.

    Kris N. Kirby;Nancy M. Petry;Warren K. Bickel

  • Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

    Nancy M. Petry;Frederick S. Stinson;Bridget F. Grant

  • DSM-5 Criteria for Substance Use Disorders: Recommendations and Rationale

    Deborah S. Hasin;Charles P. O’Brien;Marc Auriacombe;Guilherme Borges

  • Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control patients: Drug and monetary rewards.

    Gregory J. Madden;Nancy M. Petry;Gary J. Badger;Warren K. Bickel

  • An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new DSM-5 approach

    Nancy M. Petry;Florian Rehbein;Douglas A. Gentile;Jeroen S. Lemmens

  • Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls.

    Nancy M. Petry

  • Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non‐drug‐using controls

    Kris N. Kirby;Nancy M. Petry

  • Overweight and obesity are associated with psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

    Nancy M. Petry;Danielle Barry;Robert H. Pietrzak;Julie A. Wagner

  • Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure.

    S.M Alessi;N.M Petry

  • Internet gaming disorder and the DSM‐5

    Nancy M. Petry;Charles P. O'Brien

  • Substance abuse, pathological gambling, and impulsiveness

    Nancy M Petry

  • Pathological gamblers, with and without substance use disorders, discount delayed rewards at high rates

    Nancy M. Petry

  • Give them prizes, and they will come: contingency management for treatment of alcohol dependence.

    Nancy M. Petry;Bonnie Martin;Judith L. Cooney;Henry R. Kranzler

  • Prevalence of Internet gaming disorder in German adolescents: diagnostic contribution of the nine DSM-5 criteria in a state-wide representative sample.

    Florian Rehbein;Sören Kliem;Dirk Baier;Thomas Mößle

  • Shortened time horizons and insensitivity to future consequences in heroin addicts

    Nancy M. Petry;Warren K. Bickel;Martha Arnett

  • A comprehensive guide to the application of contingency management procedures in clinical settings

    Nancy M. Petry

  • Effect of Prize-Based Incentives on Outcomes in Stimulant Abusers in Outpatient Psychosocial Treatment Programs: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network Study

    Nancy M. Petry;Jessica M. Peirce;Maxine L. Stitzer;Jack Blaine

  • Gaming disorder: Its delineation as an important condition for diagnosis, management, and prevention

    John B. Saunders;Wei Hao;Jiang Long;Daniel L. King

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.

    Nancy M. Petry;Yola Ammerman;Jaime Bohl;Anne Doersch

  • A Comparison of Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adult Treatment-Seeking Pathological Gamblers

    Nancy M. Petry

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Ledgerwood
David M. Ledgerwood Wayne State University
Jeremiah Weinstock
Jeremiah Weinstock Saint Louis University
Kathleen M. Carroll
Kathleen M. Carroll Yale University
Maxine L. Stitzer
Maxine L. Stitzer Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
John M. Roll
John M. Roll Washington State University
Robert H. Pietrzak
Robert H. Pietrzak Yale University
Wayne Hall
Wayne Hall University of Queensland
Samuel A. Ball
Samuel A. Ball Yale University
Mark D. Litt
Mark D. Litt University of Connecticut Health Center
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf University of Lübeck

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up a range of related online programs and rewarding career pathways. Social work is one of the top fields closely linked to psychology, offering both clinical and community-oriented opportunities. Many universities across the USA now provide flexible, affordable social work programs online, helping students balance education with personal commitments.

If cost is a major concern, it's worth considering affordable social work programs in Michigan, which are designed to meet high academic standards without breaking the bank. Students in urban environments might look into the most affordable social work degree programs in Minneapolis, known for their accessible tuition and strong community connections. Those residing in the South can explore the most affordable social work degree programs in Mississippi, providing quality training relevant to regional needs.

Living in a large city doesn’t have to mean high tuition – there are also the cheapest social work degrees in New York City, making education accessible even in the nation’s most vibrant urban center. By researching these affordable programs, you’ll find options that align with your location, budget, and career aspirations in psychology, counseling, or social services.

Best Scientists Citing Nancy M. Petry