World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
12654
World Ranking
3556
National Ranking
2002

Mark D. Litt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Litt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark D. Litt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark D. Litt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Mark D. Litt is affiliated with the University of Connecticut Health Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on medicine and psychology, with significant contributions in pediatrics, epidemiology, experimental and cognitive psychology, general health professions, and physiology.

Their work encompasses a variety of topics related to health and behavioral sciences, including:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Mark D. Litt has contributed to numerous publications, with a strong presence in specific scholarly venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • Substance Use & Misuse
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Recent selected papers authored or coauthored by Mark D. Litt address issues such as pain-related stigma and coping strategies among adolescents with chronic pain, as well as substance use and health behaviors. Notable publications include:

  • "There's Nothing Wrong With You": Pain-Related Stigma in Adolescents With Chronic Pain (2021) in Journal of Pediatric Psychology
  • "If It Ever Really Hurts, I Try Not to Let Them Know:" The Use of Concealment as a Coping Strategy Among Adolescents With Chronic Pain (2021) in Frontiers in Psychology
  • The association between temporomandibular disorders signs and symptoms, bruxism, and health variables: A cross-sectional study (2024) in CRANIO®
  • The new normal: Changes in drinking norms from college to postcollege life (2020) in Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Prospective predictors of electronic nicotine delivery system initiation in tobacco naive young adults: A machine learning approach (2023) in Preventive Medicine Reports

Mark D. Litt frequently collaborates with other researchers. The most common coauthors include:

  • William T. Zempsky
  • Howard Tennen
  • Emily O. Wakefield
  • Rebecca M. Puhl
  • Vaishali Belamkar

In 2008, Mark D. Litt was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • Alcohol cue reactivity, negative-mood reactivity, and relapse in treated alcoholic men.

    Ned L. Cooney;Mark D. Litt;Priscilla A. Morse;Lance O. Bauer

  • Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity

    J. Allen;R. F. Anton;T. F. Babor;J. Carbonari

  • Matching alcoholics to coping skills or interactional therapies: posttreatment results.

    Ronald M. Kadden;Ned L. Cooney;Herbert Getter;Mark D. Litt

  • Self-efficacy and perceived control: cognitive mediators of pain tolerance

    Mark D. Litt

  • The role of self-efficacy in the treatment of substance use disorders

    Ronald M. Kadden;Mark D. Litt

  • Coping and cognitive factors in adaptation to in vitro fertilization failure.

    Mark D. Litt;Howard Tennen;Glenn Affleck;Susan Klock

  • Project MATCH secondary a priori hypotheses

    J. Allen;R. F. Anton;T. F. Babor;J. Carbonari

  • Sources of stress and dissatisfaction in experienced high school teachers

    Mark D. Litt;Dennis C. Turk

  • Cognitive behavioural coping skills therapy manual: a clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence,

    Ronald M Kadden;Carroll Kathleen;Dennis M Donovan;Ned L. Cooney

  • Matching Alcoholics to Coping Skills or Interactional Therapies: Two-Year Follow-Up Results.

    Ned L. Cooney;Ronald M. Kadden;Mark D. Litt;Herbert Getter

  • Types of alcoholics, II. Application of an empirically derived typology to treatment matching.

    Mark D. Litt;Thomas F. Babor;Frances K. DelBoca;Ronald M. Kadden

  • Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) with treated alcoholics: Methodological problems and potential solutions.

    Mark D. Litt;Ned L. Cooney;Priscilla Morse

  • Changing network support for drinking: network support project 2-year follow-up.

    Mark D. Litt;Ronald M. Kadden;Elise Kabela-Cormier;Nancy M. Petry

  • Coping skills and treatment outcomes in cognitive-behavioral and interactional group therapy for alcoholism.

    Mark D. Litt;Ronald M. Kadden;Ned L. Cooney;Elise Kabela

  • Reactivity to alcohol-related stimuli in the laboratory and in the field: predictors of craving in treated alcoholics.

    Mark D. Litt;Ned L. Cooney;Priscilla Morse

  • Initiation and maintenance of exercise behavior in older women: predictors from the social learning model.

    Mark D. Litt;Alison Kleppinger;James O. Judge

  • Abstinence Rates Following Behavioral Treatments for Marijuana Dependence

    Ronald M. Kadden;Mark D. Litt;Elise Kabela-Cormier;Nancy M. Petry

  • Reactivity to alcohol cues and induced moods in alcoholics.

    Mark D. Litt;Ned L. Cooney;Ronald M. Kadden;Larry Gaupp

  • Therapist effects in three treatments for alcohol problems

    J.P. Allen;M.E. Mattson;W.R. Miller;J.S. Tonigan

  • Cognitive mediators of stressful experience: Self-efficacy and perceived control

    Mark D. Litt

  • Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity

    J. P. Allen;M. E. Mattson;W. R. Miller;J. S. Tonigan

  • Matching alcoholics to coping skills or interactional therapies

    Mark D. Litt

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald M. Kadden
Ronald M. Kadden University of Connecticut Health Center
Ned L. Cooney
Ned L. Cooney Yale University
Howard Tennen
Howard Tennen University of Connecticut
Nancy M. Petry
Nancy M. Petry University of Connecticut
Thomas F. Babor
Thomas F. Babor University of Connecticut
Dennis M. Donovan
Dennis M. Donovan University of Washington
Carlo C. DiClemente
Carlo C. DiClemente University of Maryland, Baltimore County
William R. Miller
William R. Miller University of New Mexico
Robert L. Stout
Robert L. Stout Brown University
Kathleen M. Carroll
Kathleen M. Carroll Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens the door to a wide array of career opportunities. For example, there are diverse jobs in industrial organizational psychology, where professionals apply psychological principles to improve workplace productivity and culture.

Those interested in business and organizational behavior may pursue different career paths in industrial organizational psychology, ranging from consulting and human resources to leadership development roles.

Graduates with advanced qualifications can also consider what jobs you can get with a master's in behavioral psychology, including roles in mental health services, research, and therapy.

If you are drawn to serving in specialized environments, understanding the average salary for military psychologist roles can help you make an informed choice about working with the armed forces or related settings.

Online degrees in psychology provide flexibility and accessibility, helping you step into high-impact careers across various industries—from healthcare and education to business and military service.

Best Scientists Citing Mark D. Litt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles