World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard Longabaugh

Richard Longabaugh

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
16315
World Ranking
2828
National Ranking
1633

Richard Longabaugh publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Longabaugh sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 189 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard Longabaugh D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Longabaugh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1977 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Richard Longabaugh is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their academic profile includes recognition as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), an honor received in 1977.

Richard Longabaugh's work spans various aspects of psychological research, although specific details regarding their primary fields of study, subfields, or main research topics are not documented here. There is also no available information on recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications associated with them.

Longabaugh's longstanding affiliation with Brown University suggests a position within an academic or research capacity at this institution. The distinction of APA Fellowship highlights involvement and contributions recognized within the field of psychology.

Best Publications

  • Combined Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Dependence: The COMBINE Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Raymond F. Anton;Stephanie S. O’Malley;Domenic A. Ciraulo;Ron A. Cisler

  • Mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing: a review and preliminary evaluation of the evidence

    Timothy R. Apodaca;Richard Longabaugh

  • Project MATCH: Rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching patients to alcoholism treatment

    M. E. Mattson;J. P. Allen;W. R. Miller;R. K. Hester

  • Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity

    J. Allen;R. F. Anton;T. F. Babor;J. Carbonari

  • The Cost Effectiveness of Treatment for Alcoholism: A First Approximation*

    Harold Holder;Richard Longabaugh;William R. Miller;Anthony V. Rubonis

  • Evaluating the effects of a brief motivational intervention for injured drinkers in the emergency department.

    R Longabaugh;R E Woolard;T D Nirenberg;A P Minugh

  • The therapeutic alliance and its relationship to alcoholism treatment participation and outcome

    Gerard J. Connors;Kathleen M. Carroll;Carlo C. DiClemente;Richard Longabaugh

  • Project MATCH secondary a priori hypotheses

    J. Allen;R. F. Anton;T. F. Babor;J. Carbonari

  • The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC)

    William R. Miller;J. Scott Tonigan;Richard Longabaugh

  • Network support for drinking, Alcoholics Anonymous and long‐term matching effects

    Richard Longabaugh;Philip W. Wirtz;Allen Zweben;Robert L. Stout

  • Cognitive-behavioral treatment for alcohol dependence: A review of evidence for its hypothesized mechanisms of action.

    Jon Morgenstern;Richard Longabaugh

  • The technical hypothesis of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of MI's key causal model.

    Molly Magill;Jacques Gaume;Timothy R. Apodaca;Justin Walthers

  • Quality of life as an outcome measure in alcoholism treatment research.

    Dennis Donovan;Margaret E Mattson;Ron A Cisler;Richard Longabaugh

  • Internal validity of project MATCH treatments: Discriminability and integrity.

    Kathleen M. Carroll;Gerard J. Connors;Ned L. Cooney;Carlo C. DiClemente

  • A systematic review of emergency care brief alcohol interventions for injury patients

    Per Nilsen;Janette Baird;Janette Baird;Michael J. Mello;Michael J. Mello;Ted Nirenberg;Ted Nirenberg

  • General and alcohol-specific social support following treatment

    Martha C Beattie;Richard Longabaugh

  • The effect of social investment on treatment outcome.

    Richard Longabaugh;Martha Beattie;Nora Noel;Robert Stout

  • Decomposing the relationships between pretreatment social network characteristics and alcohol treatment outcome.

    William H Zywiak;Richard Longabaugh;Philip W Wirtz

  • Injury as a Motivator to Reduce Drinking

    Richard Longabaugh;P. Allison Minugh;Ted D. Nirenberg;Ted D. Nirenberg;Patrick R. Clifford

  • Concurrent validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and AUDIT zones in defining levels of severity among out-patients with alcohol dependence in the COMBINE study.

    Dennis M. Donovan;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Suzanne R. Doyle;Richard Longabaugh

  • Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity

    J. P. Allen;M. E. Mattson;W. R. Miller;J. S. Tonigan

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert L. Stout
Robert L. Stout Brown University
Molly Magill
Molly Magill Brown University
William R. Miller
William R. Miller University of New Mexico
Dennis M. Donovan
Dennis M. Donovan University of Washington
Stephen A. Maisto
Stephen A. Maisto Syracuse University
Raymond F. Anton
Raymond F. Anton Medical University of South Carolina
Carlo C. DiClemente
Carlo C. DiClemente University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Thomas F. Babor
Thomas F. Babor University of Connecticut
Kathleen M. Carroll
Kathleen M. Carroll Yale University
Ned L. Cooney
Ned L. Cooney Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology goes beyond the undergraduate level, with numerous affordable online options for advancing your education and career. If you are interested in workplace dynamics, a cheap organizational psychology masters online offers specialized training for roles in human resources, coaching, and consulting.

Students passionate about behavior therapy—especially those seeking Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) credentials—can consider the best affordable online bcba programs. These pathways open doors to working in schools, clinics, and private practice.

For those focused on mental health and direct client work, pursuing an affordable masters in clinical psychology online prepares you for licensed counseling or therapist roles. Many programs offer flexible scheduling for working professionals.

If you are aiming for leadership, research, or academic roles, the cheapest online doctoral programs in psychology can make earning a respected doctorate accessible from anywhere. Each of these online degrees supports a dynamic range of career pathways in the fast-growing field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Longabaugh

Recently Published Articles