World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
75735
World Ranking
9834
National Ranking
5055

Thomas F. Babor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. Babor sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 434 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas F. Babor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. Babor sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1986 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Thomas F. Babor is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States and contributes primarily to the field of Medicine. Their research spans various subfields including Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, and Gender Studies.

The scientist's work addresses key topics such as Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Sex and Gender in Healthcare, Health Policy Implementation Science, Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology, Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects, Gambling Behavior and Treatments, and Homelessness and Social Issues.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Thomas F. Babor are the following:

  • "The Relationship Between Exposure to Alcohol Marketing and Underage Drinking Is Causal," 2020, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs Supplement
  • "Setting Limits: Gambling, Science and Public Policy-summary of results," 2020, Addiction
  • "Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity-a summary of the third edition," 2022, Addiction
  • "Fifth anniversary of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: taking stock and looking ahead," 2021, BMJ Global Health
  • "Alkohol: Kein gewöhnliches Konsumgut," 2023, SUCHT - Zeitschrift für Wissenschaft und Praxis / Journal of Addiction Research and Practice

Their frequent co-authors include Robin Room, Kathryn Graham, Matilda Hellman, Sally Casswell, and Ingeborg Rossow.

Thomas F. Babor's research has been published in several venues with multiple publications in:

  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • Addiction
  • Drug and Alcohol Review
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs Supplement
  • BMJ Global Health

The scientist has published books with the Directory of Open Access Books (OAPEN Foundation) and Dialética eBooks. Titles include "Publishing Addiction Science" (2020) and "Álcool: uma mercadoria nada comum: pesquisa e políticas públicas" (2023).

Thomas F. Babor was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1986.

Best Publications

  • Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption-II

    John B Saunders;Olaf G. Aasland;Thomas F. Babor;Juan R. De La Fuente

  • AUDIT - The alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary care.

    Thomas Babor;John C Higgins-Biddle;John B Saunders;Maristela G Monteiro

  • Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity: Research and Public Policy

    Thomas Babor;Raul Caetano;Sally Casswell;Griffith Edwards

  • The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: An Epidemiologic Instrument Suitable for Use in Conjunction With Different Diagnostic Systems and in Different Cultures

    Lee N. Robins;John Wing;Hans Ulrich Wittchen;John E. Helzer

  • SCAN. Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry.

    J. K. Wing;T. Babor;T. Brugha;J. Burke

  • Alcohol and public health

    Robin Room;Thomas Babor;Jürgen T. Rehm

  • The alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility

    Robert Ali;Elia Awwad;Thomas Babor;Fiona Bradley

  • The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): validation of a screening instrument for use in medical settings.

    Michael J. Bohn;Thomas F. Babor;Henry R. Kranzler

  • Types of alcoholics, I. Evidence for an empirically derived typology based on indicators of vulnerability and severity.

    Thomas F. Babor;Michael Hofmann;Frances K. DelBoca;Victor Hesselbrock

  • A review of research on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)

    John P. Allen;Raye Z. Litten;Joanne B. Fertig;Thomas Babor

  • Validation of the alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST)

    Rachel Humeniuk;Robert Ali;Thomas F. Babor;Michael Farrell

  • Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Toward a Public Health Approach to the Management of Substance Abuse.

    Thomas F. Babor;Bonnie G. McRee;Patricia A. Kassebaum;Paul L. Grimaldi

  • Cognitive functioning of long-term heavy cannabis users seeking treatment.

    Nadia Solowij;Robert S Stephens;Roger A Roffman;Thomas Babor

  • The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: main findings from two randomized trials.

    Michael Dennis;Susan H. Godley;Guy Diamond;Guy Diamond;Frank M. Tims

  • Psychopathology as a predictor of treatment outcome in alcoholics.

    Bruce J. Rounsaville;Zelig S. Dolinsky;Thomas F. Babor;Roger E. Meyer

  • Verbal report methods in clinical research on alcoholism: response bias and its minimization.

    Thomas F. Babor;R. S. Stephens;G. A. Marlatt

  • Brief intervention for hazardous and harmful drinking: a manual for use in primary care.

    Thomas Babor;John C Higgins-Biddle

  • Talk is cheap: measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials.

    T F Babor;K Steinberg;R Anton;F Del Boca

  • Project MATCH: Rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching patients to alcoholism treatment

    M. E. Mattson;J. P. Allen;W. R. Miller;R. K. Hester

  • Alcohol: No ordinary commodity: Research and public policy, 2nd ed.

    Thomas Babor;Raul Caetano;Sally Casswell;Griffith Edwards

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin Room
Robin Room La Trobe University
Jürgen Rehm
Jürgen Rehm University of Toronto
Ingeborg Rossow
Ingeborg Rossow Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Sally Casswell
Sally Casswell Massey University
Harold D. Holder
Harold D. Holder Pacific Institute
Keith Humphreys
Keith Humphreys Stanford University
Henry R. Kranzler
Henry R. Kranzler University of Pennsylvania
Raul Caetano
Raul Caetano Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation
John Strang
John Strang King's College London
Ross Homel
Ross Homel Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Medicine opens doors to a wide range of healthcare careers beyond becoming a physician. Many students are now exploring flexible, affordable online options to advance their education and specialize in high-demand areas.

For nurses seeking leadership or advanced practice roles, enrolling in dnp online programs cheap can lead to a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree with lower tuition costs. Pharmacists wanting to expand their expertise can consider an online pharmd for flexible, advanced education in pharmacy practice.

Outside of clinical roles, opportunities in health information management are growing fast. A health information technology online degree equips students to manage patient data and support healthcare systems securely and efficiently. Similarly, for those interested in administrative support, enrolling in a low cost medical coding and billing online program can quickly prepare you for vital roles in medical records and billing.

Each of these online pathways offers a convenient, affordable route to join or advance in the healthcare field, making quality education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas F. Babor

Trending Scientists