World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 70 773 675 145 129 346 18902

Jim McCambridge publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jim McCambridge between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jim McCambridge published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2021. 19 of the 381 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2021. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 44 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 5 publications
1974 2025

381 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jim McCambridge: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 6
2004 12
2005 9
2006 11
2007 12
2008 12
2009 14
2010 9
2011 16
2012 17
2013 24
2014 30
2015 19
2016 14
2017 15
2018 15
2019 18
2020 25
2021 44
2022 15
2023 22
2024 14
2025 5
Total 381
Download as CSV

Jim McCambridge publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim McCambridge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 344–353 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 346 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56 346
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jim McCambridge D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim McCambridge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43 70
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jim McCambridge is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with notable contributions in General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Their work addresses a variety of topics, including:

  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Pharmaceutical Industry and Healthcare

Jim McCambridge has published extensively in the following venues:

  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (12 publications)
  • Addiction (9 publications)
  • Globalization and Health (7 publications)
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (6 publications)
  • Drug and Alcohol Review (6 publications)

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Adolescent Alcohol Use Trajectories: Risk Factors and Adult Outcomes," 2020, PEDIATRICS
  • "Conceptualising commercial entities in public health: beyond unhealthy commodities and transnational corporations," 2023, The Lancet
  • "Producing co-production: Reflections on the development of a complex intervention," 2020, Health Expectations
  • "Text messaging interventions for reducing alcohol consumption among risky drinkers: systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, Addiction
  • "Alcohol use among young Australian adults in May-June 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective cohort study," 2021, Addiction

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Mary Madden (20 collaborations)
  • Duncan Stewart (20 collaborations)
  • Matthew Lesch (16 collaborations)
  • Kypros Kypri (13 collaborations)
  • Marcus Bendtsen (11 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects.

    Jim McCambridge;John Witton;Diana R. Elbourne

  • The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial.

    Jim McCambridge;John Strang

  • Adult consequences of late adolescent alcohol consumption: a systematic review of cohort studies.

    Jim McCambridge;John McAlaney;Richard Rowe

  • Liver cirrhosis mortality rates in Britain from 1950 to 2002: an analysis of routine data

    David A Leon;Jim McCambridge

  • Life course epidemiology: recognising the importance of adolescence

    Russell M Viner;David Ross;Rebecca Hardy;Diana Kuh

  • Loss of tolerance and overdose mortality after inpatient opiate detoxification: follow up study

    John Strang;Jim McCambridge;David Best;Tracy Beswick

  • Exploratory randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design

    John A Cunningham;John A Cunningham;Kypros Kypri;Jim McCambridge

  • The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings: a systematic review.

    Jim McCambridge;Marijn de Bruin;John Witton

  • Can simply answering research questions change behaviour?: systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trials

    Jim McCambridge;Kypros Kypri

  • Alcohol industry involvement in policymaking: a systematic review.

    James McCambridge;Melissa Amina Madeleine Mialon;Benjamin Roberts Hawkins;Benjamin Roberts Hawkins

  • Methodological Challenges in Online Trials

    Elizabeth Murray;Zarnie Khadjesari;Ian R White;Eleftheria Kalaitzaki

  • CONSULTATIONS ABOUT CHANGING BEHAVIOUR

    S Rollnick;C C Butler;J McCambridge;P Kinnersley

  • Counselling for Alcohol Problems (CAP), a lay counsellor-delivered brief psychological treatment for harmful drinking in men, in primary care in India: a randomised controlled trial

    Abhijit Nadkarni;Benedict Weobong;Helen A Weiss;James McCambridge

  • Interventions for prevention of drug use by young people delivered in non‐school settings

    Simon Gates;Jim McCambridge;Lesley A Smith;David Foxcroft

  • Optimizing Millennials’ Communication Styles

    Unknown

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Completing the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Questionnaire on Self-Reported Hazardous Drinking

    Jim McCambridge;Maria Day

  • Does parental drinking influence children's drinking? A systematic review of prospective cohort studies

    Ingeborg Rossow;Patrick Keating;Lambert Felix;Jim McCambridge

  • Parental drinking and adverse outcomes in children: A scoping review of cohort studies.

    Ingeborg Rossow;Lambert Felix;Patrick Keating;Jim McCambridge;Jim McCambridge

  • Fidelity to Motivational Interviewing and subsequent cannabis cessation among adolescents

    Jim McCambridge;Maria Day;Bonnita A. Thomas;John Strang

  • Research participation effects: a skeleton in the methodological cupboard

    Jim McCambridge;Kypros Kypri;Diana Elbourne

  • Training practitioners to deliver opportunistic multiple behaviour change counselling in primary care: a cluster randomised trial

    Christopher Collett Butler;Sharon Anne Simpson;Kerenza Hood;David Cohen

  • Deterioration over time in effect of Motivational Interviewing in reducing drug consumption and related risk among young people.

    Jim McCambridge;John Strang

Frequent Co-Authors

John Strang
John Strang King's College London
John A. Cunningham
John A. Cunningham Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Ian R. White
Ian R. White University College London
Preben Bendtsen
Preben Bendtsen Linköping University
John Attia
John Attia University of Newcastle Australia
Benjamin Hawkins
Benjamin Hawkins University of Cambridge
Elizabeth Murray
Elizabeth Murray University College London
Christine Godfrey
Christine Godfrey University of York
Diana Elbourne
Diana Elbourne London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
David A. Leon
David A. Leon London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens a variety of career pathways, especially through online education. For those interested in psychology, finding the cheapest online degree in psychology can help manage tuition costs while gaining a credible degree for roles in counseling, research, or human services.

Aspiring social workers can take advantage of conveniently accessible online msw programs. These programs help students qualify for advanced positions in social services and clinical practice, with easier admissions for many candidates.

For those aiming for a clinical psychology career, there are accelerated psyd programs online. These flexible options can fast-track your journey toward becoming a licensed psychologist.

If you're interested in marriage and family therapy, check out mft programs for a quicker route to licensure. These programs often combine theoretical knowledge with practical experience—preparing graduates for a growing job market.

Whether you seek affordability, flexibility, or speed, online degrees in the social sciences and humanities can be tailored to meet your academic and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jim McCambridge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles