World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
121
Citations
118061
World Ranking
3517
National Ranking
350

Ian R. White publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian R. White sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 601 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ian R. White D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian R. White sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian R. White is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on the field of mathematics, with a specialization in statistics and related areas.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Mathematics

Within this broad area, their subfields of expertise include:

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Oncology

Key topics covered in their research are:

  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Delphi Technique in Research

Ian R. White's work is frequently published in several journals and venues, including:

  • Statistics in Medicine
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Trials
  • American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • BMJ

They have collaborated regularly with various coauthors, notably:

  • Brennan C Kahan
  • Tra My Pham
  • Tim P. Morris
  • Matteo Quartagno
  • Sally Hopewell

Recent publications by Ian R. White include:

  • "Missing Data in Clinical Research: A Tutorial on Multiple Imputation," 2020, Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • "Mindfulness-based programmes for mental health promotion in adults in nonclinical settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials," 2021, PLoS Medicine
  • "CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials," 2025, BMJ
  • "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Control Measures on the Mental Health of the General Population," 2022, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • "CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials," 2025, The Lancet

Best Publications

  • RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

    Jonathan A.C. Sterne;Jelena Savović;Jelena Savović;Matthew J. Page;Roy G. Elbers

  • Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice

    Ian R. White;Patrick Royston;Angela M. Wood

  • Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.

    Jonathan A C Sterne;Ian R White;John B Carlin;Michael Spratt

  • Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies

    N Sarwar;P Gao;Seshasai Srk.

  • Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study

    M.G. Marmot;S. Stansfeld;C. Patel;F. North

  • Lipoprotein(a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and nonvascular mortality.

    S Erqou;S Kaptoge;PL Perry;E Di Angelantonio

  • Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1·25 million people.

    Eleni Rapsomaniki;Adam Timmis;Julie George;Mar Pujades-Rodriguez

  • Plasma fibrinogen level and the risk of major cardiovascular diseases and nonvascular mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis.

    J Danesh;S Lewington;S G Thompson;Lowe Gdo.

  • Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data

    Shaun R Seaman;Ian R White

  • European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing – recommendations on best practice

    Jeanne D Johansen;Kristiina Aalto-Korte;Tove Agner;Klaus E Andersen

  • Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE): Implementation in Stata

    Patrick Royston;Ian R. White

  • C-Reactive Protein, Fibrinogen, and Cardiovascular Disease Prediction

    Stephen Kaptoge;Emanuele Di Angelantonio;Lisa Pennells;Angela M. Wood

  • Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model.

    Ian R. White;Patrick Royston

  • Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data

    Ian R White;Nicholas J Horton;James Carpenter;Stuart J Pocock

  • Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods

    Tim P. Morris;Ian R. White;Michael J. Crowther

  • Bias and efficiency of multiple imputation compared with complete‐case analysis for missing covariate values

    Ian R White;John B Carlin;John B Carlin

  • Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals:

    Angela M Wood;Ian R White;Simon G Thompson

  • Screening for Fetal Growth Restriction With Universal Third Trimester Ultrasonography in Nulliparous Women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) Study: A Prospective Cohort Study

    Ulla Sovio;Ian R. White;Alison Dacey;Dharmintra Pasupathy

  • Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform multivariate random effects meta-analyses.

    Dan Jackson;Ian R. White;Simon G. Thompson

  • A guide to handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analysis conducted within randomised controlled trials.

    Rita Faria;Manuel Gomes;David Epstein;David Epstein;Ian R. White

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeanne D. Johansen
Jeanne D. Johansen Copenhagen University Hospital
Klaus Ejner Andersen
Klaus Ejner Andersen University of Southern Denmark
Torkil Menné
Torkil Menné Copenhagen University Hospital
Dan Jackson
Dan Jackson AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Wolfgang Uter
Wolfgang Uter University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
David A. Basketter
David A. Basketter University of Bedfordshire
James R. Carpenter
James R. Carpenter University College London
Julian P T Higgins
Julian P T Higgins University of Bristol
Richard Emsley
Richard Emsley King's College London
Thomas Rustemeyer
Thomas Rustemeyer University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't always mean becoming a doctor—there are a range of do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school for those interested in nursing. Some nursing schools now waive standardized tests, creating more accessible pathways into healthcare roles.

Healthcare administration is another growing field. If you’re interested in leadership or operational roles within healthcare, pursuing a healthcare administration degree online accredited can prepare you for management positions while offering the flexibility of distance learning.

For current registered nurses, advancing your education is possible through asn to np programs. These bridge programs enable nurses to obtain a Master of Science in Nursing and even become nurse practitioners—expanding both career options and earning potential.

Another in-demand pathway is nutrition. An online bachelor's in nutrition can lead to roles in wellness, public health, or clinical nutrition. Many online programs allow students to balance studies with other commitments.

These related career pathways offer diverse opportunities within the healthcare sector, often with flexible online options to fit different educational backgrounds and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ian R. White

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles