World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
8447
World Ranking
6194
National Ranking
628

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
8686
World Ranking
5990
National Ranking
485

M. Jane Riddoch publications per year

1983: 1 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 1 publications 2015: 1 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publications 2020: 1 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publications
1983 2024

145 publications in total across all disciplines

M. Jane Riddoch publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Jane Riddoch sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 133 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

M. Jane Riddoch D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Jane Riddoch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Jane Riddoch is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their academic contributions focus on neuroscience and computer science, with particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Additional areas of study include pharmacology, anthropology, and social psychology.

Their primary research topics encompass:

  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation

Riddoch's recent scholarly articles demonstrate concentrated interests in visuospatial neglect and functional recovery after stroke, as well as attentional selection and memory representation within neuropsychological contexts. Notable publications include:

  • "Recovery of Visuospatial Neglect Subtypes and Relationship to Functional Outcome Six Months After Stroke," 2021, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • "Visuospatial neglect: Recovery & Functional outcome after 6 months," 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Handgrip Based Action Information Modulates Attentional Selection: An ERP Study," 2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • "Visuospatial memory in apraxia: Exploring quantitative drawing metrics to assess the representation of local and global information," 2024, Memory & Cognition

In addition to journal articles, Riddoch has contributed to book literature, including a publication with Psychology Press eBooks.

Frequent collaborators in Riddoch's research include:

  • Glyn W. Humphreys
  • Margaret Jane Moore
  • Kathleen Vancleef
  • Céline R. Gillebert

Publication venues frequently featuring Riddoch's work are:

  • Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Memory & Cognition

Best Publications

  • The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect.

    M J Riddoch;G W Humphreys

  • A CASE OF INTEGRATIVE VISUAL AGNOSIA

    M J Riddoch;G W Humphreys

  • To See But Not To See: A Case Study Of Visual Agnosia

    Glyn W. Humphreys;M. Jane Riddoch

  • The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS): validation of a stroke-specific short cognitive screening tool.

    Nele Demeyere;M. Jane Riddoch;Elitsa D. Slavkova;Wai-Ling Bickerton

  • Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: Neuropsychological evidence

    Glyn W. Humphreys;Nick Donnelly;M.Jane Riddoch

  • Visual Object Processing : A Cognitive Neuropsychological Approach

    Glyn W. Humphreys;M. Jane Riddoch

  • Semantic systems or system? neuropsychological evidence re-examined

    M. J. Riddoch;G. W. Humphreys;M. Coltheart;E. Funnell

  • Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets

    Glyn W. Humphreys;Philip T. Quinlan;M. Jane Riddoch

  • Grouping and Extinction: Evidence for Low-level Modulation of Visual Selection

    Iain D Gilchrist;GW Humphreys;MJ Riddoch

  • Top-down processes in object identification: evidence from experimental psychology, neuropsychology and functional anatomy

    G W Humphreys;M J Riddoch;C J Price

  • Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection

    M. Jane Riddoch;Glyn W. Humphreys;Sarah Edwards;Tracy Baker

  • Detection by action: neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search

    Glyn W. Humphreys;M. Jane Riddoch

  • Domain-specific versus generalized cognitive screening in acute stroke

    Nele Demeyere;M. J. Riddoch;E. D. Slavkova;K. Jones

  • Are faces special? A case of pure prosopagnosia

    M. Jane Riddoch;Robert A. Johnston;R. Martyn Bracewell;Luc Boutsen

  • Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations: multiple sites for visual selection

    Unknown

  • Perceptual and Action Systems in Unilateral Visual Neglect

    M. Jane Riddoch;Glyn W. Humphreys

  • Systematic assessment of apraxia and functional predictions from the Birmingham Cognitive Screen

    Wai-Ling Bickerton;Margaret Riddoch;Dana Samson;AB Balani

  • Routes to action: Evidence from apraxia

    M. Jane Riddoch;Glyn W. Humphreys;Cathy J. Price

  • Evidence from unilateral visual neglect

    Glyn W. Humphreys;M. Jane Riddoch

  • Memories are made of this: the effects of time on stored visual knowledge in a case of visual agnosia.

    M J Riddoch;G W Humphreys;T Gannon;W Blott

  • Evaluation of a test battery for hemineglect in elderly stroke patients for use by therapists in clinical practice.

    Maggie J. Bailey;M. Jane Riddoch;Peter Crome

Frequent Co-Authors

Glyn W. Humphreys
Glyn W. Humphreys University of Oxford
Dana Samson
Dana Samson Université Catholique de Louvain
A. David Milner
A. David Milner Durham University
Jules Davidoff
Jules Davidoff Goldsmiths University of London
Raffaella I. Rumiati
Raffaella I. Rumiati International School for Advanced Studies
Theresa A. Gannon
Theresa A. Gannon University of Kent
Martin Arguin
Martin Arguin University of Montreal
Andrew W. Young
Andrew W. Young University of York
Elizabeth K. Warrington
Elizabeth K. Warrington University College London
Cathy J. Price
Cathy J. Price University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees and certifications can open flexible pathways into neuroscience and related fields. Many students look for what certificates can i get online to advance their knowledge and enhance employability, even before pursuing advanced neuroscience programs. Options range from certifications in psychology, data analysis, to foundational health sciences.

For those seeking a manageable starting point, there are several easy degrees to get online that can serve as a stepping stone. Programs in life sciences, social sciences, or general studies often provide foundational knowledge relevant to neuroscience careers.

Cost is a major consideration for many students. If affordability is a top priority, consider the cheapest online msw options for advanced social science credentials, or pathways such as bcba certification programs for those interested in behavior analysis and clinical applications. These accessible, recognized qualifications can complement neuroscience studies or lead to various rewarding professions within healthcare, research, and education.

Best Scientists Citing M. Jane Riddoch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles