World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
7643
World Ranking
8504
National Ranking
120

Dana Samson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana Samson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dana Samson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana Samson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dana Samson is affiliated with the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium. Their research primarily focuses on various aspects of psychology, with an emphasis on personality and clinical fields.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology

Within psychology, Samson's subfields of concentration consist of:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The core topics in Samson's work encompass:

  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Their recent paper is titled "Automatic imitation is reduced in narcissists but only in egocentric perspective-takers" published in 2020 in the journal Acta Psychologica. This publication has garnered citations and reflects their engagement with personality psychology and behavioral studies.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Samson include:

  • Henryk Bukowski

Samson's publications have appeared notably in the venue:

  • Acta Psychologica

Best Publications

  • Seeing it their way : evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see

    Dana Samson;Ian A. Apperly;Jason J. Braithwaite;Benjamin J. Andrews

  • Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief

    Dana Samson;Ian A Apperly;Claudia Chiavarino;Glyn W Humphreys

  • Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: Evidence from a dual-task study of adults

    Adam W. Qureshi;Ian A. Apperly;Dana Samson

  • Frontal and Temporo-Parietal Lobe Contributions to Theory of Mind: Neuropsychological Evidence from a False-Belief Task with Reduced Language and Executive Demands

    Ian A. Apperly;Dana Samson;Claudia Chiavarino;Glyn W. Humphreys

  • Seeing it my way: a case of a selective deficit in inhibiting self-perspective

    Dana Samson;Ian A. Apperly;Umalini Kathirgamanathan;Glyn W. Humphreys

  • Studies of adults can inform accounts of theory of mind development

    Ian A. Apperly;Dana Samson;Glyn W. Humphreys

  • Mental calculation in a prodigy is sustained by right prefrontal and medial temporal areas

    Mauro Pesenti;Laure Zago;Fabrice Crivello;Emmanuel Mellet

  • Is Belief Reasoning Automatic

    Ian A. Apperly;Kevin J. Riggs;Andrew Simpson;Claudia Chiavarino

  • The cost of thinking about false beliefs: Evidence from adults’ performance on a non-inferential theory of mind task

    Ian A. Apperly;Elisa Back;Dana Samson

  • Separating forms of neglect using the Apples Test : validation and functional prediction in chronic and acute stroke

    Wai Ling Bickerton;Dana Samson;Jonathan Williamson;Glyn W. Humphreys

  • Domain-specificity and theory of mind: evaluating neuropsychological evidence.

    Ian A. Apperly;Dana Samson;Glyn W. Humphreys

  • Why are there limits on theory of mind use? Evidence from adults’ ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker:

    Ian A. Apperly;Daniel J. Carroll;Dana Samson;Glyn W. Humphreys

  • Altercentric interference in level 1 visual perspective taking reflects the ascription of mental states, not submentalizing.

    Tiziano Vincenzo Furlanetto;Cristina Becchio;Dana Samson;Ian Apperly

  • Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes

    Andrew David Surtees;Ian Apperly;Dana Samson

  • Unintentional perspective-taking calculates whether something is seen, but not how it is seen

    Andrew Surtees;Andrew Surtees;Dana Samson;Ian Apperly

  • The use of embodied self-rotation for visual and spatial perspective-taking.

    Andrew David Ridley Surtees;Ian A Apperly;Dana Samson

  • Intact first- and second-order false belief reasoning in a patient with severely impaired grammar.

    Ian A. Apperly;Dana Samson;Naomi Carroll;Shazia Hussain

  • Systematic assessment of apraxia and functional predictions from the Birmingham Cognitive Screen

    Wai-Ling Bickerton;Margaret Riddoch;Dana Samson;AB Balani

  • Clarifying the role of theory of mind areas during visual perspective taking: Issues of spontaneity and domain-specificity.

    Matthias Schurz;Martin Kronbichler;Martin Kronbichler;Sebastian Weissengruber;Andrew David Surtees

  • Seeing it my way or your way: Frontoparietal brain areas sustain viewpoint-independent perspective selection processes

    Richard Ramsey;Peter Hansen;Ian Apperly;Dana Samson

  • Impaired knowledge of visual and non-visual attributes in a patient with a semantic impairment for living entities: A case of a true category-specific deficit

    Dana Samson;Agnesa Pillon;De Wilde

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian A. Apperly
Ian A. Apperly University of Birmingham
Glyn W. Humphreys
Glyn W. Humphreys University of Oxford
Philippe de Timary
Philippe de Timary Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Mauro Pesenti
Mauro Pesenti Université Catholique de Louvain
Olivier Corneille
Olivier Corneille Université Catholique de Louvain
M. Jane Riddoch
M. Jane Riddoch University of Oxford
Moïra Mikolajczak
Moïra Mikolajczak Université Catholique de Louvain
Olivier Luminet
Olivier Luminet Université Catholique de Louvain
Cécile Grandin
Cécile Grandin Université Catholique de Louvain
Xavier Seron
Xavier Seron Université Catholique de Louvain

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology can open up a wide range of exciting online degrees and professional pathways. One popular route is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which is ideal for those interested in applied behavior analysis and helping individuals with behavioral challenges. Many universities and colleges across the USA offer online graduate programs in psychology and behavior analysis, providing flexibility for students with diverse schedules.

Requirements to become a BCBA can vary depending on your location. For instance, you can learn more about Huntsville bcba education requirements if you are in Alabama. If you are based in Indiana, be sure to review the Indianapolis bcba requirements. Prospective BCBAs in California should check the latest Irvine bcba education requirements, while those in Texas can see what’s involved in becoming a bcba in Irving.

Whether you pursue a future as a BCBA or another psychology-related career, starting with the right education is key. Online degree programs offer a flexible way to meet educational and certification requirements while preparing you for a rewarding career in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Dana Samson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles