World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4607 4265 207 204 169 11029

Hannes Rakoczy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hannes Rakoczy between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hannes Rakoczy published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2019. 34 of the 211 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2019. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 17 publications
2004 2025

211 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hannes Rakoczy: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 2
2006 5
2007 6
2008 8
2009 10
2010 3
2011 6
2012 5
2013 9
2014 8
2015 9
2016 15
2017 9
2018 16
2019 18
2020 11
2021 13
2022 12
2023 10
2024 17
2025 17
Total 211
Download as CSV

Hannes Rakoczy publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannes Rakoczy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 169 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 169
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Hannes Rakoczy D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannes Rakoczy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Hannes Rakoczy is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany and specializes in psychology with a focus on developmental and educational psychology. Their research primarily explores child and animal learning development, with additional interests in social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and the psychology of moral and emotional judgment.

Their work covers a range of topics including:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior

Rakoczy's recent publications include:

  • Foundations of theory of mind and its development in early childhood, 2022, Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Online Testing Yields the Same Results as Lab Testing: A Validation Study With the False Belief Task, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Why Do Young Children Look so Smart and Older Children Look so Dumb on True Belief Control Tasks? An Investigation of Pragmatic Performance Factors, 2020, Journal of Cognition and Development
  • Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional action, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Chimpanzees consider alternative possibilities, 2021, Current Biology

The venues where Rakoczy frequently publishes reflect the scope of their expertise and include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • Journal of Cognition and Development
  • Cognitive Development
  • Biology Letters

Frequent collaborators in Rakoczy's research network consist of:

  • Marina Proft
  • Lydia Paulin Schidelko
  • Esther Herrmann
  • Julia Fischer
  • Britta Schünemann

The body of work conducted by Rakoczy integrates developmental psychology with comparative cognition, involving both human and non-human subjects. Their research addresses theory of mind development, pragmatic factors affecting reasoning in children, and intentionality in animals, indicating an interdisciplinary approach spanning cognitive, social, and biological dimensions of psychology.

Best Publications

  • What Makes Human Cognition Unique? From Individual to Shared to Collective Intentionality

    Michael Tomasello;Hannes Rakoczy

  • The sources of normativity: Young children's awareness of the normative structure of games.

    Hannes Rakoczy;Felix Warneken;Michael Tomasello

  • How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind

    Stephen A. Butterfill;Ian A. Apperly

  • Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator's group affiliation

    Marco F. H. Schmidt;Hannes Rakoczy;Michael Tomasello

  • Early Social Cognition in Three Cultural Contexts

    Tara Callaghan;Henrike Moll;Hannes Rakoczy;Felix Warneken

  • The Early Ontogeny of Social Norms

    Hannes Rakoczy;Marco F. H. Schmidt

  • Young children’s understanding of violations of property rights

    Federico Rossano;Hannes Rakoczy;Michael Tomasello

  • Young children attribute normativity to novel actions without pedagogy or normative language

    Marco F. H. Schmidt;Hannes Rakoczy;Michael Tomasello

  • Why do children overimitate? Normativity is crucial.

    Stefanie Keupp;Tanya Behne;Hannes Rakoczy

  • Young children know that trying is not pretending: a test of the "behaving-as-if" construal of children's early concept of pretense.

    Hannes Rakoczy;Michael Tomasello;Tricia Striano

  • Normativity and context in young children's pretend play

    Emily Wyman;Hannes Rakoczy;Michael Tomasello

  • Young children's selective learning of rule games from reliable and unreliable models

    Hannes Rakoczy;Felix Warneken;Michael Tomasello

  • Is implicit theory of mind a real and robust phenomenon? Results from a systematic replication study.

    Louisa Kulke;Britta von Duhn;Dana Schneider;Hannes Rakoczy

  • Taking fiction seriously: young children understand the normative structure of joint pretence games.

    Hannes Rakoczy

  • How (not) to measure infant Theory of Mind: Testing the replicability and validity of four non-verbal measures

    Sebastian Dörrenberg;Sebastian Dörrenberg;Hannes Rakoczy;Ulf Liszkowski

  • Explicit Theory of Mind Is Even More Unified Than Previously Assumed: Belief Ascription and Understanding Aspectuality Emerge Together in Development

    Hannes Rakoczy;Delia Bergfeld;Ina Schwarz;Ella Fizke

  • Bigger knows better: Young children selectively learn rule games from adults rather than from peers

    Hannes. Rakoczy;Katharina. Hamann;Felix. Warneken;Michael. Tomasello

  • The Ontogeny of Social Ontology: Steps to Shared Intentionality and Status Functions

    Hannes Rakoczy;Michael Tomasello

  • How robust are anticipatory looking measures of Theory of Mind? Replication attempts across the life span

    Louisa Kulke;Mirjam Reiß;Horst Krist;Hannes Rakoczy

  • Pretence as Individual and Collective Intentionality

    Hannes Rakoczy

  • Cognitive Architecture of Belief Reasoning in Children and Adults: A Primer on the Two-Systems Account

    Jason Low;Ian A. Apperly;Stephen A. Butterfill;Hannes Rakoczy

  • In defense of a developmental dogma: children acquire propositional attitude folk psychology around age 4

    Hannes Rakoczy

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Tomasello
Michael Tomasello Duke University
Josep Call
Josep Call University of St Andrews
Felix Warneken
Felix Warneken University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Tricia Striano
Tricia Striano Hunter College
Anna Abraham
Anna Abraham University of Georgia
Daniel B. M. Haun
Daniel B. M. Haun Max Planck Society
Esther Herrmann
Esther Herrmann University of Portsmouth
Gil Diesendruck
Gil Diesendruck Bar-Ilan University
Ian A. Apperly
Ian A. Apperly University of Birmingham
Ricarda Ines Schubotz
Ricarda Ines Schubotz University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology can open doors to a wide range of specialized online programs and career pathways. One key area is industrial organizational psychology careers, where professionals use psychological principles to improve workplace productivity and employee well-being.

Those interested in human behavior might consider a master’s degree leading to roles in research, therapy, or counseling. For more information on this versatile option, see what jobs can you get with a master's in behavioral psychology.

Psychology also plays a vital role in the military, supporting the well-being and mental health of service members. If you’re curious about opportunities in this field, explore various psychology army jobs.

Neuropsychology is another rapidly growing field. If you are interested in how the brain impacts behavior and cognition, learn more from our guide, is neuropsychology a good career.

Online psychology degrees can lead to diverse and rewarding careers. Consider your interests and long-term goals when choosing a specialization, and explore these resources further for more information.

Best Scientists Citing Hannes Rakoczy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles