World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9003 8408 4771 4341 75 14176

Katherine J. Conger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Katherine J. Conger between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Katherine J. Conger published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2009. 3 of the 77 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2009. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1990 2025

77 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Katherine J. Conger: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 3
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 2
2005 1
2006 0
2007 3
2008 3
2009 10
2010 6
2011 4
2012 4
2013 5
2014 2
2015 4
2016 5
2017 2
2018 2
2019 1
2020 4
2021 1
2022 0
2023 1
2024 2
2025 1
Total 77
Download as CSV

Katherine J. Conger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine J. Conger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 75 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 75
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Katherine J. Conger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine J. Conger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Katherine J. Conger is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily addresses areas within social sciences and psychology, focusing on family dynamics, health, and psychological development.

The main fields of study in Conger's work include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

The subfields of study cover:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Demography

Katherine J. Conger's research topics encompass family and health-related themes such as:

  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health and Well-being Studies
  • Family Dynamics and Relationships

Their recent publications include:

  • "Sibling Relationships in Adulthood: Research Findings and New Frontiers" (2020), Journal of Family Theory & Review
  • "Special section on personality development: Testing environmental and genetic associations across generations." (2021), Developmental Psychology
  • "The influence of sibling relationship quality on emotional distress from adolescence to early midlife." (2024), Journal of Family Psychology
  • "Sibling relationships in older adulthood: Links with loneliness and well-being": Correction. (2020), Journal of Family Psychology
  • "The association between sibling ambivalence and well-being in older adulthood: The role of sibling gender composition" (2024), Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Frequent publication venues for Conger's work include:

  • Journal of Family Psychology
  • Journal of Family Theory & Review
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • Journal of Family Violence

Significant coauthors collaborating with Conger are:

  • Megan Gilligan
  • Clare M. Stocker
  • Tricia K. Neppl
  • Jeenkyoung Lee
  • Laura V. Scaramella

Best Publications

  • Socioeconomic Status, Family Processes, and Individual Development.

    Rand D. Conger;Katherine J. Conger;Monica J. Martin

  • A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys.

    Rand D. Conger;Katherine J. Conger;Glen H. Elder;Frederick O. Lorenz

  • Resilience in Midwestern Families: Selected Findings from the First Decade of a Prospective, Longitudinal Study

    Rand D. Conger;Katherine J. Conger

  • Linking economic hardship to marital quality and instability.

    Rand D. Conger;Glen H. Elder;Frederick O. Lorenz;Katherine J. Conger

  • Family economic stress and adjustment of early adolescent girls.

    Rand D. Conger;Katherine J. Conger;Glen H. Elder;Frederick O. Lorenz

  • The role of economic pressure in the lives of parents and their adolescents: The Family Stress Model.

    Katherine Jewsbury Conger;Martha A. Rueter;Rand D. Conger

  • Sisters, brothers, and delinquency: evaluating social influence during early and middle adolescence.

    Cheryl Slomkowski;Richard Rende;Katherine Jewsbury Conger;Ronald L. Simons

  • Parents, Siblings, Psychological Control, and Adolescent Adjustment

    Katherine Jewsbury Conger;Rand D. Conger;Laura V. Scaramella

  • Pathways of economic influence on adolescent adjustment.

    Rand D. Conger;Katherine Jewsbury Conger;Lisa S. Matthews;Glen H. Elder

  • Role of family and peers in the development of prototypes associated with substance use.

    Hart Blanton;Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard;Katherine Jewsbury Conger

  • Parenting factors, social skills, and value commitments as precursors to school failure, involvement with deviant peers, and delinquent behavior

    Ronald L. Simons;Les B. Whitbeck;Rand D. Conger;Katherine J. Conger

  • Sibling Relationships during the Transition to Adulthood.

    Katherine Jewsbury Conger;Wendy M. Little

  • Adolescent family experiences and educational attainment during early adulthood.

    Janet N. Melby;Rand D. Conger;Shu-Ann Fang;K. A. S. Wickrama

  • Parent Personality and Positive Parenting as Predictors of Positive Adolescent Personality Development Over Time.

    Thomas J. Schofield;Rand D. Conger;M. Brent Donnellan;Rachel Jochem

  • A Process Model of Family Economic Pressure and Early Adolescent Alcohol Use

    Rand D. Conger;Frederick O. Lorenz;Glen H. Elder;Janet N. Melby

  • Differential parenting and change in sibling differences in delinquency.

    Katherine Jewsbury Conger;Rand D. Conger

  • Effects of Parental Behavior on Tobacco Use by Young Male Adolescents.

    Janet N. Melby;Rand D. Conger;Katherine J. Conger;Frederick O. Lorenz

  • Personal characteristics and resilience to economic hardship and its consequences: conceptual issues and empirical illustrations.

    M. Brent Donnellan;Katherine Jewsbury Conger;Kimberly K. McAdams;Tricia K. Neppl

  • Development of Mastery during Adolescence: The Role of Family Problem Solving

    Katherine Jewsbury Conger;Shannon Tierney Williams;Wendy M. Little;Katherine E. Masyn

  • The development of interpersonal aggression during adolescence: the importance of parents, siblings, and family economics.

    Shannon Tierney Williams;Katherine Jewsbury Conger;Shelley A. Blozis

Frequent Co-Authors

Rand D. Conger
Rand D. Conger University of California, Davis
Keith F. Widaman
Keith F. Widaman University of California, Riverside
M. Brent Donnellan
M. Brent Donnellan Michigan State University
Joyce Serido
Joyce Serido University of Minnesota
Frederick O. Lorenz
Frederick O. Lorenz Iowa State University
Stephen T. Russell
Stephen T. Russell The University of Texas at Austin
Jerica M. Berge
Jerica M. Berge University of Minnesota
Glen H. Elder
Glen H. Elder University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Ronald L. Simons
Ronald L. Simons University of Georgia
Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Dianne Neumark-Sztainer University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering the wide range of opportunities in psychology, choosing the right degree is crucial for your long-term goals. Many online degrees can help you start or advance your journey. However, before enrolling, it's important to understand will a master's degree help you become a clinical psychologist. In most U.S. states, a doctoral degree is typically required for licensure as a clinical psychologist, but a master's in psychology can open doors to other rewarding roles.

If you're interested in working with younger populations, explore jobs with child psychology degree. These include school counselor, behavioral therapist, and more, each requiring specialized knowledge and skills.

Additionally, understanding the average salary for a child and adolescent psychologist can guide your education investment and career plans. Salaries can vary by state, specialization, and level of experience.

Those with a keen interest in how people think, learn, and remember may find a rewarding future in careers in cognitive psychology. This field focuses on mental processes and offers diverse pathways in research, applied settings, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Katherine J. Conger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles