World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 87 1090 957 677 580 203 27444

Meg Gerrard publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Meg Gerrard between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Meg Gerrard published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2012. 2 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2012. 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1977 2025

213 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Meg Gerrard: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 2
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 2
1982 2
1983 4
1984 1
1985 3
1986 6
1987 2
1988 1
1989 3
1990 1
1991 4
1992 2
1993 4
1994 2
1995 7
1996 4
1997 3
1998 2
1999 4
2000 4
2001 2
2002 8
2003 4
2004 4
2005 10
2006 6
2007 8
2008 9
2009 6
2010 11
2011 8
2012 14
2013 12
2014 6
2015 6
2016 7
2017 2
2018 4
2019 4
2020 5
2021 4
2022 5
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 213
Download as CSV

Meg Gerrard publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meg Gerrard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 203 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 203
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Meg Gerrard D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meg Gerrard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101 87
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Meg Gerrard is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States and works primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics with a strong focus on Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Birth, Development, and Health, as well as Racial and Ethnic Identity Research. Other notable research interests include Behavioral Health and Interventions, Optimism, Hope, and Well-being, and Media Influence and Health.

Recent publications by Meg Gerrard include:

  • "The Prototype-Willingness Model", 2020, The Wiley Encyclopedia of Health Psychology
  • "Array-Based Epigenetic Aging Indices May Be Racially Biased", 2020, Genes
  • "Refinement of cg05575921 demethylation response in nascent smoking", 2020, Clinical Epigenetics
  • "Do Loneliness and Per Capita Income Combine to Increase the Pace of Biological Aging for Black Adults across Late Middle Age?", 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Racial centrality mediates the association between adolescent racial discrimination and adult cigarette smoking outcomes among Black Americans", 2022, Social Science & Medicine

Meg Gerrard frequently collaborates with several researchers in their field, including:

  • Frederick X. Gibbons
  • Robert A. Philibert
  • Steven R. H. Beach
  • Man-Kit Lei
  • Ronald L. Simons

The scientist has published multiple articles across a variety of academic journals. Among their most frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • Genes
  • Epigenetics
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Clinical Epigenetics

Best Publications

  • Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination.

    Noel T. Brewer;Gretchen B. Chapman;Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard

  • A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model

    Meg Gerrard;Frederick X. Gibbons;Amy E. Houlihan;Michelle L. Stock

  • Perceived Discrimination and the Adjustment of African American Youths: A Five-Year Longitudinal Analysis With Contextual Moderation Effects

    Gene H. Brody;Yi Fu Chen;Velma McBride Murry;Xiaojia Ge

  • Reasoned action and social reaction: Willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk.

    Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard;Hart Blanton;Daniel W. Russell

  • Predicting young adults' health risk behavior.

    Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard

  • The Influence of Neighborhood Disadvantage, Collective Socialization, and Parenting on African American Children's Affiliation with Deviant Peers

    Gene H Brody;Xiaojia Xiaojia Ge;Rand Conger;Frederick X Gibbons

  • Perceived Discrimination and Substance Use in African American Parents and Their Children: A Panel Study.

    Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard;Michael J. Cleveland;Thomas A. Wills

  • Relation Between Perceived Vulnerability to HIV and Precautionary Sexual Behavior

    Meg Gerrard;Frederick X. Gibbons;Brad J. Bushman

  • Risk perceptions: assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination.

    Neil D. Weinstein;Abbie Kwitel;Kevin D. McCaul;Renee E. Magnan

  • A longitudinal study of the reciprocal nature of risk behaviors and cognitions in adolescents: what you do shapes what you think, and vice versa.

    Meg Gerrard;Frederick X. Gibbons;Alida C. Benthin;Robert M. Hessling

  • A Social Reaction Model of Adolescent Health Risk

    Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard;David J. Lane

  • The Strong African American families program: Translating research into prevention programming

    Gene H. Brody;Velma McBride Murry;Meg Gerrard;Frederick X. Gibbons

  • Beyond group-mean differences: The concept of item bias.

    David Thissen;Lynne Steinberg;Meg Gerrard

  • Adolescent Self-Consciousness: Longitudinal Age Changes and Gender Differences in Two Cohorts

    Jane L. Rankin;David J. Lane;Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard

  • Natural helping systems: A survey of Red Cross volunteers

    Michael B. Frisch;Meg Gerrard

  • Family communication and religiosity related to substance use and sexual behavior in early adolescence: a test for pathways through self-control and prototype perceptions.

    Thomas Ashby Wills;Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard;Velma McBride Murry

  • Effects of upward and downward social comparison on mood states.

    Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard

  • Downward comparison and coping with threat.

    Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard

  • Using UV photography to reduce use of tanning booths: a test of cognitive mediation.

    Frederick X. Gibbons;Meg Gerrard;David J. Lane;Heike I. M. Mahler

  • Images of Smokers and Willingness to Smoke Among African American Pre-adolescents: An Application of the Prototype/Willingness Model of Adolescent Health Risk Behavior to Smoking Initiation

    Meg Gerrard;Frederick X. Gibbons;Michelle L. Stock;Linda S. Vande Lune

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick X. Gibbons
Frederick X. Gibbons University of Connecticut
Gene H. Brody
Gene H. Brody University of Georgia
Ronald L. Simons
Ronald L. Simons University of Georgia
Thomas Ashby Wills
Thomas Ashby Wills University of Hawaii at Manoa
Steven R. H. Beach
Steven R. H. Beach University of Georgia
Heike I. M. Mahler
Heike I. M. Mahler University of California, San Diego
Velma McBride Murry
Velma McBride Murry Vanderbilt University
James D. Sargent
James D. Sargent Dartmouth College
James A. Kulik
James A. Kulik University of California, San Diego
Hart Blanton
Hart Blanton Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to varied career paths, including social work. Online psychology and social work programs can provide the foundational skills needed for licensure and advanced educational opportunities in states across the U.S. However, specific requirements for becoming a licensed social worker can vary significantly depending on your location.

For instance, if you are interested in becoming a social worker in Tennessee, you’ll need to meet defined educational and licensure standards. Similarly, learning about the requirements to be a social worker in Texas can help you plan your academic journey more effectively.

Those aiming for a career in Utah should review the specific Utah social work education requirements, while students interested in New England may want to read about becoming a social worker in Vermont. Understanding these pathways will help you select the right online degree and prepare for state-specific credentialing processes.

Best Scientists Citing Meg Gerrard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles