World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Diane Poulin-Dubois

Diane Poulin-Dubois

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
7670
World Ranking
5760
National Ranking
394

Diane Poulin-Dubois publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane Poulin-Dubois sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 159 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Diane Poulin-Dubois D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane Poulin-Dubois sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diane Poulin-Dubois is affiliated with Concordia University in Canada and has a research focus primarily within the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience. Their work extensively covers Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education, and Control and Systems Engineering.

Themes frequently addressed in their publications include:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior
  • Cultural Differences and Values

The scientist has contributed to various scholarly articles published in prominent venues such as Cognitive Development, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, and Frontiers in Developmental Psychology. The following recent papers showcase some of their research output:

  • Theory of mind development: State of the science and future directions, 2020, Progress in Brain Research
  • Testing the stability of theory of mind: A longitudinal approach, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Discontinuity from implicit to explicit theory of mind from infancy to preschool age, 2022, Cognitive Development

Frequent collaborators include Elizabeth J. Goldman, Anna-Elisabeth Baumann, Kimberly Burnside, Elizabeth Dutemple, and Margaret Friend. Collaboration with these coauthors has occurred across multiple publications, reinforcing thematic continuity in their research pursuits.

In addition to journal articles, the researcher has authored a book titled Theory of Mind in Childhood, published by Cambridge University Press in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction.

    David H. Rakison;Diane Poulin-Dubois

  • The effects of bilingualism on toddlers’ executive functioning

    Diane Poulin-Dubois;Agnes Blaye;Julie Coutya;Ellen Bialystok

  • Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year

    Lisa A. Serbin;Diane Poulin-Dubois;Karen A. Colburne;Maya G. Sen

  • Word Mapping and Executive Functioning in Young Monolingual and Bilingual Children

    Ellen Bialystok;Raluca Barac;Agnes Blaye;Diane Poulin-Dubois

  • Infants' concept of animacy.

    Diane Poulin-Dubois;Anouk Lepage;Doreen Ferland

  • Men Don’t Put on Make‐up: Toddlers’ Knowledge of the Gender Stereotyping of Household Activities

    Diane Poulin-Dubois;Lisa A. Serbin;Julie A. Eichstedt;Maya G. Sen

  • Lexical access and vocabulary development in very young bilinguals.

    Diane Poulin-Dubois;Ellen Bialystok;Agnes Blaye;Alexandra Polonia

  • To See or Not to See: Infants Prefer to Follow the Gaze of a Reliable Looker.

    Virginia Chow;Diane Poulin-Dubois;Jessica Lewis

  • Early lexical development: the contribution of parental labelling and infants' categorization abilities.

    Diane Poulin-Dubois;Susan Graham;Lorrie Sippola

  • The effects of bilingual growth on toddlers' executive function.

    Cristina Crivello;Olivia Kuzyk;Monyka Rodrigues;Margaret Friend

  • Infants' Ability to Distinguish Between Intentional and Accidental Actions and Its Relation to Internal State Language

    Kara M. Olineck;Diane Poulin-Dubois

  • The development of the understanding of human behavior: From agency to intentionality.

    Diane Poulin-Dubois;Thomas R. Shultz

  • Infants' Intermodal Knowledge about Gender.

    Diane Poulin-Dubois;Lisa A. Serbin;Brenda Kenyon;Alison Derbyshire

  • The Developmental Origins of Selective Social Learning

    Diane Poulin-Dubois;Patricia Brosseau-Liard

  • Do infants understand false beliefs? We don't know yet – A commentary on Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate's commentary

    Diane Poulin-Dubois;Hannes Rakoczy;Kimberly Burnside;Cristina Crivello

  • Infants' disambiguation of novel object words

    Susan A. Graham;Diane Poulin-Dubois;Rachel K. Baker

  • Infants prefer to imitate a reliable person.

    Diane Poulin-Dubois;Ivy Brooker;Alexandra Polonia

  • Infants' distinction between animate and inanimate objects: The origins of naive psychology.

    Diane Poulin-Dubois

  • Breaking the rules: Do infants have a true understanding of false belief?

    Jessica Yott;Diane Poulin-Dubois

  • The Language Exposure Assessment Tool: Quantifying Language Exposure in Infants and Children

    Stephanie DeAnda;Stephanie DeAnda;Laura Bosch;Diane Poulin-Dubois;Pascal Zesiger

  • Infants' reliance on shape to generalize novel labels to animate and inanimate objects.

    Susan A. Graham;Diane Poulin-Dubois

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan A. Graham
Susan A. Graham University of Calgary
Lisa A. Serbin
Lisa A. Serbin Concordia University
Beate Sodian
Beate Sodian Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Krista Byers-Heinlein
Krista Byers-Heinlein Concordia University
Thomas R. Shultz
Thomas R. Shultz McGill University
Ellen Bialystok
Ellen Bialystok York University
David H. Rakison
David H. Rakison Carnegie Mellon University
Josef Perner
Josef Perner University of Salzburg
Hannes Rakoczy
Hannes Rakoczy University of Göttingen
Michael C. Frank
Michael C. Frank Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology online can open up a variety of career opportunities, including roles in counseling, therapy, and mental health services. One key step for aspiring professionals is understanding state-specific licensure requirements to practice as a therapist. Each state sets its own standards, which may include specific educational credentials, supervised clinical experience, and passing relevant exams.

For example, those interested in practicing in Alaska can review the steps for how to become a licensed therapist in Anchorage. Requirements may differ in other locations, such as Virginia, where the Arlington licensed therapist requirements provide a helpful guide. Similarly, understanding the Atlanta licensed therapist education requirements or the Aurora licensed therapist requirements is essential for those targeting Georgia or Colorado.

With psychology careers in high demand, online degrees offer flexible pathways to meet these state-specific qualifications while balancing work or personal commitments. Thoroughly researching credentialing in your desired location ensures you’re prepared for a successful and fulfilling career.

Best Scientists Citing Diane Poulin-Dubois

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles