World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ricarda Ines Schubotz

Ricarda Ines Schubotz

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
10382
World Ranking
6868
National Ranking
325

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
10420
World Ranking
7074
National Ranking
591

Ricarda Ines Schubotz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricarda Ines Schubotz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 205 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ricarda Ines Schubotz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricarda Ines Schubotz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Cognition
  • Neuroscience
  • Artificial intelligence

Her scientific interests lie mostly in Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Cognitive psychology, Premotor cortex, Neuroscience and Perception. Her Functional magnetic resonance imaging research incorporates themes from Functional neuroimaging, Lateralization of brain function, Visual perception, Semantic memory and Brain mapping. Her research in Cognitive psychology intersects with topics in Neural correlates of consciousness, Temporal cortex, Supplementary motor area and Representation.

Her Premotor cortex research includes elements of Motor cortex, Stimulus and Cognition. The Posterior parietal cortex, Broca's region and Inferior frontal cortex research she does as part of her general Neuroscience study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Extreme capsule and Tractography, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. Ricarda Ines Schubotz has included themes like Motor system, Premotor Areas, Conceptualization and Hand movements in her Perception study.

Her most cited work include:

  • The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity (465 citations)
  • Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework. (409 citations)
  • Prediction, cognition and the brain (388 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Ricarda Ines Schubotz mostly deals with Neuroscience, Cognitive psychology, Premotor cortex, Functional magnetic resonance imaging and Perception. Her Neuroscience study often links to related topics such as Rhythm. The concepts of her Cognitive psychology study are interwoven with issues in Social psychology, Inferior frontal gyrus, Communication, Prefrontal cortex and Theory of mind.

She has researched Premotor cortex in several fields, including Motor cortex, Broca's area and Intraparietal sulcus. Ricarda Ines Schubotz interconnects Object, Audiology, Visual perception and Brain mapping in the investigation of issues within Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Her Perception research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Motor system and Sensory system.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Neuroscience (47.85%)
  • Cognitive psychology (30.65%)
  • Premotor cortex (27.42%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Neuroscience (47.85%)
  • Cognitive psychology (30.65%)
  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (24.73%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Ricarda Ines Schubotz mainly focuses on Neuroscience, Cognitive psychology, Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Action observation and Perception. Her studies deal with areas such as Parkinson's disease and Flexibility as well as Neuroscience. Her work deals with themes such as Premotor cortex, Dopaminergic, Stimulation and Surprise, which intersect with Parkinson's disease.

Her Cognitive psychology research incorporates elements of Cognition, Inferior frontal gyrus, Communication, Stimulus and Facilitation. Ricarda Ines Schubotz studies Functional magnetic resonance imaging, focusing on Supplementary motor area in particular. Her Perception research includes themes of Developmental psychology and Information theory.

Between 2015 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • What's she doing in the kitchen? Context helps when actions are hard to recognize. (19 citations)
  • Confining the Concept of Vascular Depression to Late-Onset Depression: A Meta-Analysis of MRI-Defined Hyperintensity Burden in Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder. (12 citations)
  • Reduced fractional anisotropy in depressed patients due to childhood maltreatment rather than diagnosis. (9 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Cognition
  • Neuroscience
  • Artificial intelligence

Her primary areas of study are Cognitive psychology, Inferior frontal gyrus, Communication, Major depressive disorder and Perception. The Cognitive psychology study combines topics in areas such as Superior frontal sulcus, Working memory, Posterior cingulate, Angular gyrus and Brain mapping. She is doing genetic studies as part of her Neuroscience and Cognition and Inferior frontal gyrus investigations.

Ricarda Ines Schubotz combines subjects such as Motor activity, Precuneus and Spatial relation with her study of Communication. The study incorporates disciplines such as Internal medicine, Cohort and Neuroimaging in addition to Major depressive disorder. Her research investigates the connection between Perception and topics such as Semantics that intersect with problems in Facilitation.

Best Publications

  • Prediction, cognition and the brain

    Andreja Bubic;D. Yves von Cramon;Ricarda Ines Schubotz

  • The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: functional localization and structural connectivity.

    Angela D. Friederici;Jörg Bahlmann;Stefan Heim;Ricarda Ines Schubotz

  • Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty.

    Thomas Jacobsen;Ricarda Ines Schubotz;L. Höfel;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework.

    Ricarda Ines Schubotz

  • Time perception and motor timing: A common cortical and subcortical basis revealed by fMRI

    Ricarda Ines Schubotz;Angela D. Friederici;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Functional-anatomical concepts of human premotor cortex: evidence from fMRI and PET studies.

    Ricarda Ines Schubotz;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca's area.

    Jörg Bahlmann;Ricarda Ines Schubotz;Angela D. Friederici

  • Functional organization of the lateral premotor cortex: fMRI reveals different regions activated by anticipation of object properties, location and speed.

    Ricarda Ines Schubotz;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Predicting events of varying probability: uncertainty investigated by fMRI

    Kirsten G. Volz;Ricarda Ines Schubotz;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Sequences of Abstract Nonbiological Stimuli Share Ventral Premotor Cortex with Action Observation and Imagery

    Ricarda Ines Schubotz;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions

    Sabrina Fagioli;Bernhard Hommel;Ricarda Ines Schubotz

  • Variants of uncertainty in decision-making and their neural correlates.

    Kirsten G. Volz;Ricarda Ines Schubotz;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Interval and ordinal properties of sequences are associated with distinct premotor areas

    Ricarda Ines Schubotz;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Predicting Perceptual Events Activates Corresponding Motor Schemes in Lateral Premotor Cortex: An fMRI Study

    Ricarda Ines Schubotz;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Dynamic anticipatory processing of hierarchical sequential events: A common role for Broca's area and ventral premotor cortex across domains?

    Christian J. Fiebach;Ricarda Ines Schubotz

  • Premotor cortex in observing erroneous action: an fMRI study.

    Sophie Manthey;Ricarda Ines Schubotz;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Thinking about the future versus the past in personal and non-personal contexts.

    Anna Abraham;Ricarda Ines Schubotz;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Why am I unsure? Internal and external attributions of uncertainty dissociated by fMRI.

    Kirsten G. Volz;Ricarda Ines Schubotz;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Auditory what, where, and when: a sensory somatotopy in lateral premotor cortex.

    Ricarda Ines Schubotz;D. Yves von Cramon;Gabriele Lohmann

  • Tuning-in to the Beat: Aesthetic Appreciation of Musical Rhythms Correlates with a Premotor Activity Boost

    Katja Kornysheva;D. Yves von Cramon;Thomas Jacobsen;Ricarda Ines Schubotz

Frequent Co-Authors

D. Yves von Cramon
D. Yves von Cramon Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Gereon R. Fink
Gereon R. Fink University of Cologne
Thomas Jacobsen
Thomas Jacobsen Helmut Schmidt University
Anna Abraham
Anna Abraham University of Georgia
Markus Raab
Markus Raab German Sport University Cologne
Wolfgang Prinz
Wolfgang Prinz Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Marc Tittgemeyer
Marc Tittgemeyer Max Planck Society
Stefan Zysset
Stefan Zysset Max Planck Society
Hannes Rakoczy
Hannes Rakoczy University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a range of related fields that can be pursued online, offering flexibility and diverse career options. For those interested in human behavior and mental health, programs like an accelerated psychology bachelor’s degree online can prepare you for roles in research, counseling, or social services.

If your interests lean toward supporting individuals and communities, consider a fast track social work degree online. These programs let you transition quickly into high-impact professions while maintaining the flexibility to study at your own pace.

For aspiring counselors, finding programs that are both reputable and affordable is key. You might explore the cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online, which meet rigorous industry standards and can pave the way to professional licensure. Additionally, enrolling in an affordable master’s in counseling online program can make advanced education accessible without excessive financial burden.

Combining neuroscience with these online pathways not only broadens your expertise but also enhances your employment prospects in healthcare, education, and counseling sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Ricarda Ines Schubotz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles