World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
6397
World Ranking
8567
National Ranking
100

Marcos Nadal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcos Nadal sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Marcos Nadal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcos Nadal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcos Nadal is affiliated with the University of the Balearic Islands in Spain and specializes primarily in the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sensory Systems, and Visual Arts and Performing Arts.

Their work broadly covers topics such as Aesthetic Perception and Analysis, Multisensory Perception and Integration, Color Perception and Design, Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Creativity in Education and Neuroscience, Art History and Market Analysis, and Neuroscience and Music Perception.

Frequent venues for publication include:

  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • British Journal of Psychology
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Physics of Life Reviews
  • Empirical Studies of the Arts

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Nadal include:

  • Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors, 2020, Cortex
  • A Farewell to Art: Aesthetics as a Topic in Psychology and Neuroscience, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • There are no aesthetic emotions: Comment on Menninghaus et al. (2019), 2020, Psychological Review
  • The nature of beauty: behavior, cognition, and neurobiology, 2020, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • A Set of 200 Musical Stimuli Varying in Balance, Contour, Symmetry, and Complexity: Behavioral and Computational Assessments, 2020, Behavior Research Methods

Some of the researchers with whom Nadal frequently collaborates include:

  • Martin Skov
  • Oshin Vartanian
  • Helmut Leder
  • Anjan Chatterjee
  • Ana Clemente

Best Publications

  • Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments : The aesthetic episode – Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics

    Helmut Leder;Marcos Nadal

  • Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture

    Oshin Vartanian;Gorka Navarrete;Gorka Navarrete;Anjan Chatterjee;Lars Brorson Fich

  • Art in Time and Space: Context Modulates the Relation between Art Experience and Viewing Time

    David Brieber;Marcos Nadal;Helmut Leder;Raphael Rosenberg

  • Neuroaesthetics: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Aesthetic Experience.

    Marcus T. Pearce;Dahlia W. Zaidel;Oshin Vartanian;Martin Skov

  • Predicting beauty: fractal dimension and visual complexity in art.

    A. Forsythe;M. Nadal;N. Sheehy;C. J. Cela-Conde

  • Architectural design and the brain: effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions

    Oshin Vartanian;Gorka Navarrete;Anjan Chatterjee;Lars Brorson Fich

  • Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty

    Camilo J. Cela-Conde;Francisco J. Ayala;Enric Munar;Fernando Maestú

  • Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference.

    Marcos Nadal;Enric Munar;Miquel Angel Capó;Jaume Rosselló

  • Visual Complexity and Beauty Appreciation: Explaining the Divergence of Results:

    Marcos Nadal;Enric Munar;Gisèle Marty;Camilo José Cela-Conde

  • The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation.

    Camilo J. Cela-Conde;Luigi Agnati;Joseph P. Huston;Francisco Mora

  • In the white cube: museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art.

    David Brieber;Marcos Nadal;Helmut Leder

  • Preference for Curvature: A Historical and Conceptual Framework.

    Gerardo Gómez-Puerto;Enric Munar;Marcos Nadal

  • The Copenhagen Neuroaesthetics conference: Prospects and pitfalls for an emerging field

    Marcos Nadal;Marcus T. Pearce

  • Computerized measures of visual complexity.

    Penousal Machado;Juan Romero;Marcos Nadal;Antonino Santos

  • Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors.

    Alexander Coburn;Alexander Coburn;Oshin Vartanian;Yoed N. Kenett;Marcos Nadal

  • The experience of art: Insights from neuroimaging

    Marcos Nadal

  • Common Visual Preference for Curved Contours in Humans and Great Apes

    Enric Munar;Gerardo Gómez-Puerto;Josep Call;Josep Call;Marcos Nadal

  • Electrophysiological correlates of looking at paintings and its association with art expertise.

    C.Y. Pang;M. Nadal;J.S. Müller-Paul;R. Rosenberg

  • A Farewell to Art: Aesthetics as a Topic in Psychology and Neuroscience.

    Martin Skov;Martin Skov;Marcos Nadal

  • The world can look better: enhancing beauty experience with brain stimulation

    Zaira Cattaneo;Carlotta Lega;Albert Flexas;Marcos Nadal

  • A new conception of visual aesthetic sensitivity.

    Guido Corradi;Erick G. Chuquichambi;Juan Ramón Barrada;Ana Clemente

Frequent Co-Authors

Helmut Leder
Helmut Leder University of Vienna
Zaira Cattaneo
Zaira Cattaneo University of Milano-Bicocca
Anjan Chatterjee
Anjan Chatterjee University of Pennsylvania
Josep Call
Josep Call University of St Andrews
Christoph Klein
Christoph Klein University of Freiburg
Juha Silvanto
Juha Silvanto University of Surrey
Tomaso Vecchi
Tomaso Vecchi University of Pavia
Francisco J. Ayala
Francisco J. Ayala University of California, Irvine
Marta Torrens
Marta Torrens Autonomous University of Barcelona
Margalida Gili
Margalida Gili University of the Balearic Islands

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to diverse career options and online learning opportunities in the USA. Many students interested in mental health may wonder, what degree does a psychiatrist need. Typically, psychiatrists must earn a medical degree (MD or DO) in addition to completing undergraduate studies in psychology or related fields.

Those fascinated by sports and mental health can ask, how do I become a sports psychologist. This field usually requires at least a master’s or doctoral degree in psychology, as well as specialized training in sports settings.

Not all therapists need a traditional psychology background. If you’re wondering, can you be a therapist without getting a psychology degree, the answer varies. Some therapy positions accept degrees in related fields, such as social work or counseling, with additional certification.

The field of workplace psychology is also expanding. For those interested in organizational behavior, understanding the industrial organizational psychology degree needed can guide your education choices. Usually, a specialized master’s or doctoral program is required. With so many online programs available, you can find flexible options for any of these careers.

Best Scientists Citing Marcos Nadal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles