World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8564 7998 100 99 103 6397

Marcos Nadal publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcos Nadal between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcos Nadal published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2015. 9 of the 122 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2015. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
2002 2025

122 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcos Nadal: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 3
2006 6
2007 4
2008 2
2009 3
2010 2
2011 4
2012 4
2013 8
2014 7
2015 13
2016 3
2017 8
2018 6
2019 5
2020 8
2021 13
2022 12
2023 1
2024 5
2025 4
Total 122
Download as CSV

Marcos Nadal publications per year - data summary

  • Marcos Nadal, a Psychology scholar from University of the Balearic Islands, has 122 publications recorded across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2002 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2015 and 2021, with 13 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2002 and 2023, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 24 years in the span carry no publications at all (2003 and 2004).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.5 per year counting only the 22 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 35 publications, 29% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2002-2009: 19 publications (2.4 per year); 2010-2017: 49 publications (6.1 per year); 2018-2025: 54 publications (6.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Marcos Nadal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcos Nadal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 103
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcos Nadal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Marcos Nadal, a Psychology scholar from University of the Balearic Islands, records 103 publications - the 22nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 22% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Marcos Nadal, and about 78% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Marcos Nadal ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Marcos Nadal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcos Nadal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Marcos Nadal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Marcos Nadal, a Psychology scholar from University of the Balearic Islands, records 39 D-Index - the 27th percentile of the discipline.
  • 27% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Marcos Nadal, and about 73% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Marcos Nadal ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Marcos Nadal is affiliated with the University of the Balearic Islands in Spain and specializes primarily in the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sensory Systems, and Visual Arts and Performing Arts.

Their work broadly covers topics such as Aesthetic Perception and Analysis, Multisensory Perception and Integration, Color Perception and Design, Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Creativity in Education and Neuroscience, Art History and Market Analysis, and Neuroscience and Music Perception.

Frequent venues for publication include:

  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • British Journal of Psychology
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Physics of Life Reviews
  • Empirical Studies of the Arts

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Nadal include:

  • Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors, 2020, Cortex
  • A Farewell to Art: Aesthetics as a Topic in Psychology and Neuroscience, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • There are no aesthetic emotions: Comment on Menninghaus et al. (2019), 2020, Psychological Review
  • The nature of beauty: behavior, cognition, and neurobiology, 2020, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • A Set of 200 Musical Stimuli Varying in Balance, Contour, Symmetry, and Complexity: Behavioral and Computational Assessments, 2020, Behavior Research Methods

Some of the researchers with whom Nadal frequently collaborates include:

  • Martin Skov
  • Oshin Vartanian
  • Helmut Leder
  • Anjan Chatterjee
  • Ana Clemente

Best Publications

  • Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments : The aesthetic episode – Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics

    Helmut Leder;Marcos Nadal

  • Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture

    Oshin Vartanian;Gorka Navarrete;Gorka Navarrete;Anjan Chatterjee;Lars Brorson Fich

  • Art in Time and Space: Context Modulates the Relation between Art Experience and Viewing Time

    David Brieber;Marcos Nadal;Helmut Leder;Raphael Rosenberg

  • Neuroaesthetics: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Aesthetic Experience.

    Marcus T. Pearce;Dahlia W. Zaidel;Oshin Vartanian;Martin Skov

  • Predicting beauty: fractal dimension and visual complexity in art.

    A. Forsythe;M. Nadal;N. Sheehy;C. J. Cela-Conde

  • Architectural design and the brain: effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions

    Oshin Vartanian;Gorka Navarrete;Anjan Chatterjee;Lars Brorson Fich

  • Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty

    Camilo J. Cela-Conde;Francisco J. Ayala;Enric Munar;Fernando Maestú

  • Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference.

    Marcos Nadal;Enric Munar;Miquel Angel Capó;Jaume Rosselló

  • Visual Complexity and Beauty Appreciation: Explaining the Divergence of Results:

    Marcos Nadal;Enric Munar;Gisèle Marty;Camilo José Cela-Conde

  • The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation.

    Camilo J. Cela-Conde;Luigi Agnati;Joseph P. Huston;Francisco Mora

  • In the white cube: museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art.

    David Brieber;Marcos Nadal;Helmut Leder

  • Preference for Curvature: A Historical and Conceptual Framework.

    Gerardo Gómez-Puerto;Enric Munar;Marcos Nadal

  • The Copenhagen Neuroaesthetics conference: Prospects and pitfalls for an emerging field

    Marcos Nadal;Marcus T. Pearce

  • Computerized measures of visual complexity.

    Penousal Machado;Juan Romero;Marcos Nadal;Antonino Santos

  • Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors.

    Alexander Coburn;Alexander Coburn;Oshin Vartanian;Yoed N. Kenett;Marcos Nadal

  • The experience of art: Insights from neuroimaging

    Marcos Nadal

  • Common Visual Preference for Curved Contours in Humans and Great Apes

    Enric Munar;Gerardo Gómez-Puerto;Josep Call;Josep Call;Marcos Nadal

  • Electrophysiological correlates of looking at paintings and its association with art expertise.

    C.Y. Pang;M. Nadal;J.S. Müller-Paul;R. Rosenberg

  • A Farewell to Art: Aesthetics as a Topic in Psychology and Neuroscience.

    Martin Skov;Martin Skov;Marcos Nadal

  • The world can look better: enhancing beauty experience with brain stimulation

    Zaira Cattaneo;Carlotta Lega;Albert Flexas;Marcos Nadal

  • A new conception of visual aesthetic sensitivity.

    Guido Corradi;Erick G. Chuquichambi;Juan Ramón Barrada;Ana Clemente

Frequent Co-Authors

Helmut Leder
Helmut Leder University of Vienna
Oshin Vartanian
Oshin Vartanian University of Toronto
Marcus T. Pearce
Marcus T. Pearce Queen Mary University of London
Zaira Cattaneo
Zaira Cattaneo University of Milano-Bicocca
Anjan Chatterjee
Anjan Chatterjee University of Pennsylvania
Fernando Maestú
Fernando Maestú Complutense University of Madrid
Josep Call
Josep Call University of St Andrews
Juha Silvanto
Juha Silvanto University of Surrey
Christoph Klein
Christoph Klein University of Freiburg
Francisco J. Ayala
Francisco J. Ayala University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to diverse career options and online learning opportunities in the USA. Many students interested in mental health may wonder, what degree does a psychiatrist need. Typically, psychiatrists must earn a medical degree (MD or DO) in addition to completing undergraduate studies in psychology or related fields.

Those fascinated by sports and mental health can ask, how do I become a sports psychologist. This field usually requires at least a master’s or doctoral degree in psychology, as well as specialized training in sports settings.

Not all therapists need a traditional psychology background. If you’re wondering, can you be a therapist without getting a psychology degree, the answer varies. Some therapy positions accept degrees in related fields, such as social work or counseling, with additional certification.

The field of workplace psychology is also expanding. For those interested in organizational behavior, understanding the industrial organizational psychology degree needed can guide your education choices. Usually, a specialized master’s or doctoral program is required. With so many online programs available, you can find flexible options for any of these careers.

Best Scientists Citing Marcos Nadal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles