World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
9812
World Ranking
4232
National Ranking
364

Christoph Redies publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christoph Redies sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 167 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Christoph Redies D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christoph Redies sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christoph Redies is affiliated with Friedrich Schiller University Jena in Germany. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on neuroscience and computer science. Within these broader fields, their work concentrates on cognitive neuroscience, computer vision and pattern recognition, social psychology, artificial intelligence, and sensory systems.

The core topics covered in their research include aesthetic perception and analysis, color perception and design, image and video quality assessment, visual perception and processing mechanisms, advanced text analysis techniques, olfactory and sensory function studies, and image retrieval and classification techniques.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Global Image Properties Predict Ratings of Affective Pictures, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Integration of ultrasonography training into undergraduate medical education: catch up with professional needs, 2022, Insights into Imaging
  • Aesthetic Perception of Line Patterns: Effect of Edge-Orientation Entropy and Curvilinear Shape, 2020, i-Perception
  • Liking of art and the perception of color., 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Fractality and Variability in Canonical and Non-Canonical English Fiction and in Non-Fictional Texts, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology

The frequent publication venues where Christoph Redies has contributed include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • i-Perception
  • Entropy
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Insights into Imaging

Frequent collaborators in their research endeavors are:

  • Ralf Bartho
  • Mahdi Mohseni
  • Volker Gast
  • Carolin S. Altmann
  • Anselm Brachmann

Best Publications

  • Cadherins in the central nervous system.

    Christoph Redies

  • N-cadherin mediates pericytic-endothelial interaction during brain angiogenesis in the chicken.

    Holger Gerhardt;Hartwig Wolburg;Christoph Redies

  • Cadherins in the developing central nervous system: an adhesive code for segmental and functional subdivisions.

    Christoph Redies;Masatoshi Takeichi

  • Cadherins and neuropsychiatric disorders.

    Christoph Redies;Nicole Hertel;Christian A. Hübner

  • Statistical regularities in art: Relations with visual coding and perception

    Daniel J. Graham;Christoph Redies

  • A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli.

    Christoph Redies

  • δ-Protocadherins: unique structures and functions

    C. Redies;K. Vanhalst;F. van Roy

  • The cadherin superfamily in neural development: diversity, function and interaction with other molecules.

    Shinji Hirano;Shintaro T Suzuki;Christoph Redies

  • Differential expression of N- and R-cadherin in functional neuronal systems and other structures of the developing chicken brain.

    Christoph Redies;K. Engelhart;M. Takeichi

  • Fractal-Like Image Statistics in Visual Art: Similarity to Natural Scenes

    Christoph Redies;Jens Hasenstein;Joachim Denzler

  • Combining universal beauty and cultural context in a unifying model of visual aesthetic experience.

    Christoph Redies

  • The neon color effect in the Ehrenstein illusion.

    Christoph Redies;Lothar Spillmann

  • Neuronal responses to borders with and without luminance gradients in cat visual cortex and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus.

    C. Redies;J. M. Crook;O. D. Creutzfeldt

  • Morphologic fate of diencephalic prosomeres and their subdivisions revealed by mapping cadherin expression.

    Christoph Redies;Meike Ast;Shinichi Nakagawa;Masatoshi Takeichi

  • δ-Protocadherins: a gene family expressed differentially in the mouse brain

    K. Vanhalst;P. Kools;K. Staes;F. van Roy

  • Differential expression of R- and N-cadherin in neural and mesodermal tissues during early chicken development.

    H. Inuzuka;C. Redies;M. Takeichi

  • Expression of N-cadherin mRNA during development of the mouse brain

    C. Redies;C. Redies;M. Takeichi

  • Modularity in vertebrate brain development and evolution

    Christoph Redies;Luis Puelles

  • Restricted expression of N- and R-cadherin on neurites of the developing chicken CNS

    Christoph Redies;Hiroyuki Inuzuka;Masatoshi Takeichi

  • Targeting Axons to Specific Fiber Tracts In Vivo by Altering Cadherin Expression

    Ullrich Treubert-Zimmermann;Dominik Heyers;Christoph Redies

Frequent Co-Authors

Joachim Denzler
Joachim Denzler Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Luis Puelles
Luis Puelles University of Murcia
Shinichi Nakagawa
Shinichi Nakagawa University of New South Wales
Gyula Kovács
Gyula Kovács Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Loreta Medina
Loreta Medina University of Lleida
Hartwig Wolburg
Hartwig Wolburg University of Tübingen
Holger Gerhardt
Holger Gerhardt Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine
Stefan R. Schweinberger
Stefan R. Schweinberger Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Marco Bertamini
Marco Bertamini University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Christoph Redies

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles