World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 49 18065 16579 7385 6591 104 7994

Tadao Maeda publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tadao Maeda between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tadao Maeda published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2012. 5 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2012. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1999 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tadao Maeda: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 6
2003 4
2004 5
2005 5
2006 6
2007 3
2008 5
2009 12
2010 4
2011 8
2012 13
2013 11
2014 7
2015 3
2016 0
2017 0
2018 1
2019 0
2020 3
2021 2
2022 3
2023 6
2024 2
2025 3
Total 117
Download as CSV

Tadao Maeda publications per year - data summary

  • Tadao Maeda, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Case Western Reserve University, has 117 publications recorded across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1999 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 13 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2000 and 2018, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 27 years in the span carry no publications at all (2016, 2017 and 2019).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.9 per year counting only the 24 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 16 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1999-2007: 34 publications (3.8 per year); 2008-2016: 63 publications (7.0 per year); 2017-2025: 20 publications (2.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Tadao Maeda publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tadao Maeda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 104 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546 104
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Tadao Maeda publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 47–56 to 1,028+ publications.
  • Tadao Maeda, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Case Western Reserve University, records 104 publications - the 6th percentile of the discipline.
  • 6% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Tadao Maeda, and about 94% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 197–206 publications range, and Tadao Maeda ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 127–136 publications, holding 980 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 287–296 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Tadao Maeda D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tadao Maeda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718 49
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Tadao Maeda D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 65 ranges running from 40–41 to 167+ D-Index.
  • Tadao Maeda, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Case Western Reserve University, records 49 D-Index - the 9th percentile of the discipline.
  • 9% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Tadao Maeda, and about 91% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 64–65 D-Index range, and Tadao Maeda ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 58–59 D-Index, holding 1,253 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 72–73 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Tadao Maeda is affiliated with Case Western Reserve University in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to Molecular Biology and Ophthalmology among other related subfields.

Their scientific work concentrates on the study of retinal development, disorders, and treatments, encompassing a broad understanding of retinal and optic conditions as well as advancements in neuroscience and neural engineering. Other prominent research topics in their portfolio include retinal imaging and analysis, photoreceptor and optogenetics research, and applications of CRISPR and genetic engineering.

Maeda's publication record includes notable papers such as:

  • HLA-Matched Allogeneic iPS Cells-Derived RPE Transplantation for Macular Degeneration, 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Safety and stable survival of stem-cell-derived retinal organoid for 2 years in patients with retinitis pigmentosa, 2023, Cell stem cell
  • Strategies of pluripotent stem cell-based therapy for retinal degeneration: update and challenges, 2022, Trends in Molecular Medicine
  • Trends of Stem Cell Therapies in Age-Related Macular Degeneration, 2021, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Melanin concentration and depolarization metrics measurement by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography, 2020, Scientific Reports

Their frequent co-authors include Masayo Takahashi, Yasuo Kurimoto, Michiko Mandai, Yasuhiko Hirami, and Daiki Sakai, reflecting extensive collaborative research efforts.

Maeda's work has been published predominantly in venues such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Ophthalmology Science, Cell stem cell, and Trends in Molecular Medicine. Among these, Scientific Reports features four of their publications, indicating a recurrent engagement with this journal.

Best Publications

  • Lecithin-retinol Acyltransferase Is Essential for Accumulation of All-trans-Retinyl Esters in the Eye and in the Liver

    Matthew L. Batten;Yoshikazu Imanishi;Tadao Maeda;Daniel C. Tu

  • Essential role of Ca2+-binding protein 4, a Cav1.4 channel regulator, in photoreceptor synaptic function.

    Françoise Haeseleer;Yoshikazu Imanishi;Tadao Maeda;Daniel E Possin

  • Transcription factor–mediated reprogramming of fibroblasts to expandable, myelinogenic oligodendrocyte progenitor cells

    Fadi J Najm;Angela M Lager;Anita Zaremba;Krysta Wyatt

  • Retinopathy in Mice Induced by Disrupted All-trans-retinal Clearance

    Akiko Maeda;Tadao Maeda;Marcin Golczak;Krzysztof Palczewski

  • Involvement of All-trans-retinal in Acute Light-induced Retinopathy of Mice

    Akiko Maeda;Tadao Maeda;Marcin Golczak;Steven Chou

  • Probing mechanisms of photoreceptor degeneration in a new mouse model of the common form of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa due to P23H opsin mutations

    Sanae Sakami;Tadao Maeda;Grzegorz Bereta;Kiichiro Okano

  • The Function of Guanylate Cyclase 1 and Guanylate Cyclase 2 in Rod and Cone Photoreceptors

    Wolfgang Baehr;Sukanya Karan;Tadao Maeda;Dong Gen Luo

  • Mechanism of All-trans-retinal Toxicity with Implications for Stargardt Disease and Age-related Macular Degeneration

    Yu Chen;Kiichiro Okano;Tadao Maeda;Vishal Chauhan

  • Photoreceptor proteins initiate microglial activation via Toll-like receptor 4 in retinal degeneration mediated by all-trans-retinal.

    Hideo Kohno;Yu Chen;Brian M. Kevany;Eric Pearlman

  • Recovery of visual functions in a mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis.

    J. Preston Van Hooser;Yan Liang;Tadao Maeda;Vladimir Kuksa

  • Rhodopsin Signaling and Organization in Heterozygote Rhodopsin Knockout Mice

    Yan Liang;Dimitrios Fotiadis;Tadao Maeda;Akiko Maeda

  • Rhodopsin phosphorylation: 30 years later

    Tadao Maeda;Yoshikazu Imanishi;Krzysztof Palczewski

  • Autophagy Protects the Retina from Light-induced Degeneration

    Yu Chen;Yu Chen;Osamu Sawada;Hideo Kohno;Yun Zheng Le

  • Role of Photoreceptor-specific Retinol Dehydrogenase in the Retinoid Cycle in Vivo

    Akiko Maeda;Tadao Maeda;Yoshikazu Imanishi;Vladimir Kuksa

  • Sponge transgenic mouse model reveals important roles for the microRNA-183 (miR-183)/96/182 cluster in postmitotic photoreceptors of the retina.

    Qubo Zhu;Wenyu Sun;Kiichiro Okano;Yu Chen

  • Redundant and unique roles of retinol dehydrogenases in the mouse retina

    Akiko Maeda;Tadao Maeda;Wenyu Sun;Houbin Zhang

  • Functional characterization of rhodopsin monomers and dimers in detergents

    Beata Jastrzebska;Tadao Maeda;Li Zhu;Dimitrios Fotiadis

  • Primary amines protect against retinal degeneration in mouse models of retinopathies

    Akiko Maeda;Marcin Bernard Golczak;Yu Chen;Kiichiro Okano

  • Delayed dark adaptation in 11-cis-retinol dehydrogenase-deficient mice: a role of RDH11 in visual processes in vivo.

    Tom S. Kim;Akiko Maeda;Tadao Maeda;Cynthia Heinlein

  • Mechanism of All-trans-retinal Toxicity with Implications for

    Yu Chen;Kiichiro Okano;Tadao Maeda;Vishal Chauhan

Frequent Co-Authors

Krzysztof Palczewski
Krzysztof Palczewski University of California, Irvine
Akiko Maeda
Akiko Maeda Case Western Reserve University
Marcin Golczak
Marcin Golczak Case Western Reserve University
Slawomir Filipek
Slawomir Filipek University of Warsaw
Masayo Takahashi
Masayo Takahashi Kyoto University
Wolfgang Baehr
Wolfgang Baehr University of Utah
Andreas Engel
Andreas Engel University of Basel
Eric Pearlman
Eric Pearlman University of California, Irvine
Johannes von Lintig
Johannes von Lintig Case Western Reserve University
Fred Rieke
Fred Rieke University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re studying Biology or Biochemistry, a wide range of related online degrees can open new doors in healthcare, nutrition, and scientific research. These flexible learning options are ideal for students seeking to balance their studies with work or family responsibilities.

Nursing remains a popular pathway, with online asn program options preparing students for direct patient care roles. For those interested in dietetics or human health, accredited online nutrition degrees offer a foundation in essential sciences and public health concepts.

Moving into healthcare management, the top online mha programs that are cahme accredited equip graduates with leadership skills highly valued in healthcare settings. Those already in nursing may consider advancing with online dnp programs that provide doctorate-level education—often without the need for clinical requirements.

Choosing an online degree in these fields broadens your skills and career options, whether you wish to remain in science, move into management, or work directly with patients and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Tadao Maeda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles