| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular Biology | 49 | 2606 | 2357 | 1277 | 1145 | 121 | 13366 |
The chart shows the history of publications by T. Michael Redmond between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. T. Michael Redmond published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2003. 16 of the 183 publications appeared in the last two years.
183 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 1 |
| 1985 | 4 |
| 1986 | 3 |
| 1987 | 4 |
| 1988 | 3 |
| 1989 | 7 |
| 1990 | 4 |
| 1991 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0 |
| 1993 | 2 |
| 1994 | 1 |
| 1995 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0 |
| 1997 | 2 |
| 1998 | 3 |
| 1999 | 2 |
| 2000 | 5 |
| 2001 | 5 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2003 | 9 |
| 2004 | 4 |
| 2005 | 4 |
| 2006 | 5 |
| 2007 | 2 |
| 2008 | 4 |
| 2009 | 4 |
| 2010 | 5 |
| 2011 | 2 |
| 2012 | 7 |
| 2013 | 6 |
| 2014 | 6 |
| 2015 | 7 |
| 2016 | 6 |
| 2017 | 9 |
| 2018 | 4 |
| 2019 | 8 |
| 2020 | 4 |
| 2021 | 7 |
| 2022 | 7 |
| 2023 | 8 |
| 2024 | 9 |
| 2025 | 7 |
| Total | 183 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Michael Redmond sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 121 publications — 22nd percentile
22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 47–56 | 7 | |
| 57–66 | 17 | |
| 67–76 | 65 | |
| 77–86 | 90 | |
| 87–96 | 125 | |
| 97–106 | 131 | |
| 107–116 | 162 | |
| 117–126 | 177 | 121 |
| 127–136 | 158 | |
| 137–146 | 158 | |
| 147–156 | 146 | |
| 157–166 | 159 | |
| 167–176 | 131 | |
| 177–186 | 110 | |
| 187–196 | 112 | |
| 197–206 | 100 | |
| 207–216 | 89 | |
| 217–226 | 98 | |
| 227–236 | 74 | |
| 237–246 | 72 | |
| 247–256 | 63 | |
| 257–266 | 53 | |
| 267–276 | 54 | |
| 277–286 | 49 | |
| 287–296 | 52 | |
| 297–306 | 43 | |
| 307–316 | 46 | |
| 317–326 | 41 | |
| 327–336 | 42 | |
| 337–346 | 31 | |
| 347–356 | 28 | |
| 357–366 | 29 | |
| 367–376 | 26 | |
| 377–386 | 24 | |
| 387–396 | 24 | |
| 397–406 | 14 | |
| 407–416 | 13 | |
| 417–426 | 20 | |
| 427–436 | 12 | |
| 437–446 | 20 | |
| 447–456 | 11 | |
| 457–466 | 10 | |
| 467–476 | 14 | |
| 477–486 | 14 | |
| 487–496 | 10 | |
| 497–506 | 13 | |
| 507–516 | 13 | |
| 517–526 | 2 | |
| 527–536 | 4 | |
| 537–546 | 6 | |
| 547–556 | 8 | |
| 557–563 | 6 | |
| 564+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where T. Michael Redmond sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 49 D-Index — 16th percentile
16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 40–41 | 36 | |
| 42–43 | 101 | |
| 44–45 | 115 | |
| 46–47 | 121 | |
| 48–49 | 118 | 49 |
| 50–51 | 130 | |
| 52–53 | 106 | |
| 54–55 | 116 | |
| 56–57 | 113 | |
| 58–59 | 129 | |
| 60–61 | 120 | |
| 62–63 | 105 | |
| 64–65 | 131 | |
| 66–67 | 95 | |
| 68–69 | 97 | |
| 70–71 | 106 | |
| 72–73 | 83 | |
| 74–75 | 89 | |
| 76–77 | 77 | |
| 78–79 | 70 | |
| 80–81 | 73 | |
| 82–83 | 60 | |
| 84–85 | 48 | |
| 86–87 | 45 | |
| 88–89 | 50 | |
| 90–91 | 31 | |
| 92–93 | 51 | |
| 94–95 | 43 | |
| 96–97 | 38 | |
| 98–99 | 39 | |
| 100–101 | 41 | |
| 102–103 | 29 | |
| 104–105 | 33 | |
| 106–107 | 35 | |
| 108–109 | 20 | |
| 110–111 | 38 | |
| 112–113 | 19 | |
| 114–115 | 28 | |
| 116–117 | 13 | |
| 118–119 | 23 | |
| 120–121 | 16 | |
| 122–123 | 15 | |
| 124–125 | 11 | |
| 126–127 | 21 | |
| 128–129 | 7 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 14 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 9 | |
| 138–139 | 8 | |
| 140–141 | 16 | |
| 142–143 | 7 | |
| 144 | 7 | |
| 145+ | 100 |
Albert M. Maguire;Francesca Simonelli;Eric A. Pierce;Edward N. Pugh
T. Michael Redmond;Shirley Yu;Eric Lee;Dean Bok
Albert M. Maguire;Albert M. Maguire;Katherine A. High;Katherine A. High;Alberto Auricchio;J. Fraser Wright;J. Fraser Wright
Francesca Simonelli;Albert M Maguire;Albert M Maguire;Francesco Testa;Eric A Pierce
Marlhens F;Bareil C;Griffoin Jm;Zrenner E
T. Michael Redmond;Eugenia Poliakov;Shirley Yu;Jen-Yue Tsai
C P Hamel;E Tsilou;B A Pfeffer;J J Hooks
T. Michael Redmond;Susan Gentleman;Todd Duncan;Shirley Yu
C Grimm;A Wenzel;F Hafezi;S Yu
Kristina Narfström;Martin L Katz;Ragnheidur Bragadottir;Mathias Seeliger
Mathias W. Seeliger;Christian Grimm;Fredrik Ståhlberg;Fredrik Ståhlberg;Christoph Friedburg
Nadine S Dejneka;Enrico M Surace;Tomas S Aleman;Artur V Cideciyan
Michael L Woodruff;Zhongyan Wang;Hae Yun Chung;T Michael Redmond
Gesine Huber;Susanne C. Beck;Christian Grimm;Ayse Sahaboglu-Tekgoz
Baerbel Rohrer;Heather R. Lohr;Peter Humphries;T. Michael Redmond
Martin L. Katz;T. Michael Redmond
Michael Danciger;Michael T. Matthes;Douglas Yasamura;Novrouz B. Akhmedov
T. M. Redmond;B. Wiggert;F. A. Robey;Nga Yen Nguyen
Gennadiy Moiseyev;Rosalie K. Crouch;Patrice Goletz;John Oatis
Gennadiy Moiseyev;Yusuke Takahashi;Ying Chen;S. Gentleman
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
For those studying Molecular Biology in the USA, there are several flexible online degree options and career advancement pathways to consider in the healthcare and biology fields. Many students who pair a background in molecular biology with a nursing qualification seek out rn to np programs, which offer a streamlined route for registered nurses to become nurse practitioners. These bridge programs are popular for those seeking greater responsibility and higher earning potential.
If you don't already have a nursing background, direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online allow career changers with bachelor’s degrees in science-related fields like molecular biology to quickly transition into advanced nursing roles. Comparing universities is also important—resources such as capella university vs wgu rn to bsn can help you evaluate program quality, tuition fees, and learning formats.
Additionally, if you want a flexible undergraduate pathway, online bsn programs provide affordable and accredited options for both new and returning students. These online alternatives allow you to balance your studies with work or research commitments while building a strong foundation for a dynamic science or healthcare career.
The University of Texas at Arlington
Goddard Space Flight Center
Utrecht University
Cornell University
National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
University of Bergen
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
McGill University
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Academia Sinica
Kyoto University
Bank of Spain
Newcastle University
Sorbonne University
Columbia University
