World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas D. O’Rourke

Thomas D. O’Rourke

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
44
Citations
14199
World Ranking
5678
National Ranking
1582

Thomas D. O’Rourke publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas D. O’Rourke sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 173 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Thomas D. O’Rourke D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas D. O’Rourke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1993 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For inspirational teaching and leadership in geotechnical and earthquake engineering for lifeline utilities.

Overview

Thomas D. O'Rourke is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has an extensive research portfolio in engineering, with a focus on civil and structural engineering. Their work spans multiple interconnected subfields including mechanical engineering, ocean engineering, and aspects of safety, risk, reliability, and quality. The main concentration lies in geotechnical engineering and underground structures, which is reflected in the majority of their publications.

The core topics explored in their research include:

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
  • Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
  • Concrete Corrosion and Durability
  • Geophysical Methods and Applications
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis

Their recent papers cover a range of issues related to seismic impacts on infrastructure and pipeline systems. Notable publications include:

  • "Ductile iron pipeline response to earthquake-induced ground rupture," 2020, Earthquake Spectra
  • "Multihazard Scenarios for Regional Seismic Risk Assessment of Spatially Distributed Infrastructure," 2021, Journal of Infrastructure Systems
  • "Lateral deformation behaviour of structural internal replacement pipe repair systems," 2023, Composite Structures
  • "State-of-the-Art Review of Performance Objectives for Legacy Gas Pipelines with Pipe-in-Pipe Rehabilitation Technologies," 2022, Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
  • "Pipeline Response to Seismic Displacement at Balboa Boulevard during the 1994 Northridge Earthquake," 2023, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Lifelines 2022
  • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Geo-Congress 2022
  • Earthquake Spectra
  • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

The scientist has collaborated extensively with peers such as Brad P. Wham, Shanika Kiriella, Hamid Ahmadi, Warna Karunasena, and Patrick Dixon, indicating a strong network in the research community with multiple joint publications.

Awards recognizing their contributions include being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1999 and election as a Member of the National Academy of Engineering in 1993 for their work in geotechnical and earthquake engineering related to lifeline utilities.

Best Publications

  • A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities

    Michel Bruneau;Stephanie E. Chang;Ronald T. Eguchi;George C. Lee

  • Construction Induced Movements of Insitu Walls

    G. Wayne Clough;Thomas D. O'Rourke

  • PILE RESPONSE TO LATERAL SPREADS: CENTRIFUGE MODELING

    Tarek Abdoun;Ricardo Dobry;Thomas D. O’Rourke;S. H. Goh

  • Assessment of Liquefaction-Induced Land Damage for Residential Christchurch

    S. van Ballegooy;P. Malan;V. Lacrosse;M. E. Jacka

  • Lateral Force-Displacement Response of Buried Pipe

    Charles H. Trautmann;Thomas D. O'Rourke

  • Shear Strength Characteristics of Sand‐Polymer Interfaces

    T. D. O'Rourke;S. J. Druschel;A. N. Netravali

  • GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE 22 FEBRUARY 2011 CHRISTCHURCH EARTHQUAKE

    Misko Cubrinovski;Brendon Bradley;Liam Wotherspoon;Russell Green

  • Lateral and Upward Soil-Pipeline Interactions in Sand for Deep Embedment Conditions

    S. Yimsiri;K. Soga;K. Yoshizaki;G. R. Dasari

  • Factors influencing the behavior of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake faulting

    Tarek H. Abdoun;Da Ha;Michael J. O’Rourke;Michael D. Symans

  • Single Piles in Lateral Spreads: Field Bending Moment Evaluation

    Ricardo Dobry;Tqarek Abdoun;Thomas D. O’Rourke;S. H. Goh

  • Earthquake Response of Underground Pipeline Networks in Christchurch, NZ:

    Thomas D. O'Rourke;Sang-Soo Jeon;Selcuk Toprak;Misko Cubrinovski

  • Centrifuge Modeling of Earthquake Effects on Buried High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipelines Crossing Fault Zones

    Da Ha;Tarek H. Abdoun;Michael J. O’Rourke;Michael D. Symans

  • Northridge Earthquake Effects on Pipelines and Residential Buildings

    Sang-Soo Jeon;Thomas D. O’Rourke

  • Case studies of liquefaction and lifeline performance during past earthquakes

    政則 浜田;T. D. O'Rourke

  • Buried high-density polyethylene pipelines subjected to normal and strike-slip faulting — a centrifuge investigation

    Da HaD. Ha;Da HaD. Ha;Tarek H. AbdounT.H. Abdoun;Tarek H. AbdounT.H. Abdoun;Michael J. O’RourkeM.J. O’Rourke;Michael J. O’RourkeM.J. O’Rourke;Michael D. SymansM.D. Symans;Michael D. SymansM.D. Symans

  • GROUND MOVEMENTS CAUSED BY BRACED EXCAVATIONS

    Thomas D. O’Rourke

  • Pipelines Subjected to Fault Movement in Dry and Unsaturated Soils

    D J Robert;K Soga;T D O’Rourke

  • The 1906 San Francisco Earthquake and Fire—Enduring Lessons for Fire Protection and Water Supply

    C. Scawthorn;T. D. O’Rourke;F. T. Blackburn

  • Tactile pressure sensors for soil-structure interaction assessment.

    Michael C. Palmer;Thomas D. O’Rourke;Nathaniel A. Olson;Tarek Abdoun

  • The Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake of January 17, 1995 : performance of lifelines

    Masanobu Shinozuka;Donald Ballantyne;Roger Borcherdt;I. G. Buckle

  • Geohazards and large, geographically distributed systems

    T.D. O'rourke

Frequent Co-Authors

Tarek Abdoun
Tarek Abdoun Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Ricardo Dobry
Ricardo Dobry Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Misko Cubrinovski
Misko Cubrinovski University of Canterbury
Masanobu Shinozuka
Masanobu Shinozuka Columbia University
Kenichi Soga
Kenichi Soga University of California, Berkeley
Jonathan D. Bray
Jonathan D. Bray University of California, Berkeley
Brian D. Collins
Brian D. Collins United States Geological Survey
Jonathan P. Stewart
Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles
Brendon A. Bradley
Brendon A. Bradley University of Canterbury
Anil N. Netravali
Anil N. Netravali Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, but it’s important to explore related fields that complement this area of study. For example, a library science degree can benefit those interested in managing scientific data and resources, offering skills in information organization that are valuable in research institutions and environmental agencies.

Creative professionals might consider pairing their Earth Science knowledge with an online digital photography degree. This combination is especially useful for careers in environmental documentation, geospatial imaging, or media related to natural sciences.

Veterans looking for flexible education options can explore best military friendly online photography degrees, which provide supportive pathways to transition into civilian roles that leverage technical and observational skills gained in service.

On the linguistic front, pairing Earth Science with a short Spanish degrees can enhance career prospects, particularly in international environmental policy and cross-border research collaborations.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas D. O’Rourke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles