World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
67
Citations
19488
World Ranking
1286
National Ranking
422

Jonathan D. Bray publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan D. Bray sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 264 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Jonathan D. Bray D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan D. Bray sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For contributions to earthquake engineering and advances in mitigation of surface faulting, liquefaction, and seismic slope failure.

Overview

Jonathan D. Bray is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their main field of study is Engineering, with a strong focus on Civil and Structural Engineering. Additional subfields include Geophysics, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Ocean Engineering.

Their work spans several topics related to geotechnical engineering, including:

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Seismic Performance and Analysis

Jonathan D. Bray has published extensively, with key papers including:

  • Effective Stress Analysis of Liquefiable Sites to Estimate the Severity of Sediment Ejecta, 2021, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Liquefaction resistance of Christchurch sandy soils from direct simple shear tests, 2020, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
  • Cyclic and monotonic simple shear testing of native Christchurch silty soil, 2021, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
  • Estimating the Severity of Liquefaction Ejecta Using the Cone Penetration Test, 2021, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Seismic Response Characteristics of Liquefiable Sites with and without Sediment Ejecta Manifestation, 2021, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

Publication venues where Jonathan D. Bray frequently appears include:

  • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
  • Earthquake Spectra
  • Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication
  • Geo-Congress 2022

Their common collaborators are:

  • Jorge Macedo
  • Diane Moug
  • Patrick Bassal
  • Misko Cubrinovski
  • Zorana Mijic

Jonathan D. Bray was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Engineering in 2015, credited for work in earthquake engineering and advances related to mitigation of surface faulting, liquefaction, and seismic slope failure.

Best Publications

  • Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region

    Jonathan D. Bray;Adrian Rodriguez-Marek

  • Simplified Procedure for Estimating Earthquake-Induced Deviatoric Slope Displacements

    Jonathan D. Bray;Jonathan D. Bray;Thaleia Travasarou;Thaleia Travasarou

  • Simplified Frequency Content Estimates of Earthquake Ground Motions

    Ellen M. Rathje;Norman A. Abrahamson;Jonathan D. Bray

  • Assessment of the Liquefaction Susceptibility of Fine-Grained Soils

    Jonathan D. Bray;Jonathan D. Bray;Rodolfo B. Sancio;Rodolfo B. Sancio

  • Recent Advances in Soil Liquefaction Engineering: A Unified and Consistent Framework

    Raymond B. Seed;K. Onder Cetin;Robb E.S. Moss;Annie M. Kammerer

  • Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design

    Jonathan P. Stewart;Shyh Jeng Chiou;Jonathan D. Bray;Robert W. Graves

  • Mechanisms of Seismically Induced Settlement of Buildings with Shallow Foundations on Liquefiable Soil

    Shideh Dashti;Jonathan D. Bray;Juan M. Pestana;Michael Riemer

  • Empirical attenuation relationship for Arias Intensity

    Thaleia Travasarou;Jonathan D. Bray;Norman A. Abrahamson

  • Selecting a suitable time step for discrete element simulations that use the central difference time integration scheme

    Catherine O'Sullivan;Jonathan D. Bray

  • NONLINEAR COUPLED SEISMIC SLIDING ANALYSIS OF EARTH STRUCTURES

    Ellen M. Rathje;Ellen M. Rathje;Jonathan D. Bray

  • Empirical Relationships for Frequency Content Parameters of Earthquake Ground Motions

    Ellen M. Rathje;Fadi Faraj;Stephanie Russell;Jonathan D. Bray

  • EARTHQUAKE FAULT RUPTURE PROPAGATION THROUGH SOIL

    Jonathan D. Bray;Raymond B. Seed;Lloyd S. Cluff;H. Bolton Seed

  • Earthquake-Induced Displacements of Solid-Waste Landfills

    Jonathan D. Bray;Ellen M. Rathje

  • Assessment of Liquefaction-Induced Land Damage for Residential Christchurch

    S. van Ballegooy;P. Malan;V. Lacrosse;M. E. Jacka

  • Unit weight of municipal solid waste

    Dimitrios Zekkos;Jonathan D. Bray;Edward Kavazanjian;Neven Matasovic

  • GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE 22 FEBRUARY 2011 CHRISTCHURCH EARTHQUAKE

    Misko Cubrinovski;Brendon Bradley;Liam Wotherspoon;Russell Green

  • Soil Liquefaction Effects in the Central Business District during the February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake

    Misko Cubrinovski;Jonathan D. Bray;Merrick Taylor;Simona Giorgini

  • Centrifuge Testing to Evaluate and Mitigate Liquefaction-Induced Building Settlement Mechanisms

    Shideh Dashti;Jonathan D. Bray;Juan M. Pestana;Michael Riemer

  • An Empirical Geotechnical Seismic Site Response Procedure

    Adrián Rodríguez-Marek;Jonathan D. Bray;Norman A. Abrahamson

  • Subsurface Characterization at Ground Failure Sites in Adapazari, Turkey

    Jonathan D. Bray;Rodolfo B. Sancio;H. Turan Durgunoglu;Akin Onalp

  • Selecting and Scaling Earthquake Ground Motions for Performing Response-History Analyses | NIST

    Andrew Whittaker;Gail Atkinson;Jack Baker;Jonathan Bray

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond B. Seed
Raymond B. Seed University of California, Berkeley
Misko Cubrinovski
Misko Cubrinovski University of Canterbury
Jonathan P. Stewart
Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles
Ellen M. Rathje
Ellen M. Rathje The University of Texas at Austin
Bruce L. Kutter
Bruce L. Kutter University of California, Davis
Tara C. Hutchinson
Tara C. Hutchinson University of California, San Diego
Joseph Wartman
Joseph Wartman University of Washington
Catherine O'Sullivan
Catherine O'Sullivan Imperial College London
Ross W. Boulanger
Ross W. Boulanger University of California, Davis
Brendon A. Bradley
Brendon A. Bradley University of Canterbury

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and technology students often explore diverse fields that complement their technical education. Pursuing related online degrees can open up new career pathways and improve employability in various industries.

For those interested in the business side, an online mba aacsb program offers specialized management training accredited by top business schools. Professionals who wish to combine their analytical skills with a people-focused approach may consider a masters of human resources to lead workforce initiatives within tech organizations.

Expanding into hospitality or legal sectors is also possible. An online hospitality management degree provides essential skills for managing operations and teams in global service industries, while a paralegal certificate online aba-approved can lead to a legal support role for tech companies and startups.

Each of these flexible online options helps students tailor their education to their evolving career aspirations and stay competitive in today’s dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan D. Bray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles