World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 44 4753 4377 124 118 174 6765

Roberto Paolucci publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roberto Paolucci between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roberto Paolucci published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2008. 10 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2008. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 13 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
1982 2025

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roberto Paolucci: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 5
1998 1
1999 3
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 3
2004 3
2005 1
2006 13
2007 7
2008 16
2009 11
2010 10
2011 16
2012 5
2013 3
2014 5
2015 7
2016 5
2017 7
2018 15
2019 9
2020 3
2021 7
2022 10
2023 7
2024 6
2025 4
Total 188
Download as CSV

Roberto Paolucci publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Paolucci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 174 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490 174
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Roberto Paolucci D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Paolucci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248 44
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Roberto Paolucci is affiliated with the Polytechnic University of Milan in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on engineering and earth and planetary sciences, with a particular emphasis on civil and structural engineering and geophysics. Additional areas of study include management, monitoring, policy and law, artificial intelligence, and mechanical engineering.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects, notably seismic performance and analysis, seismic waves and analysis, earthquake and tectonic studies, structural health monitoring techniques, geotechnical engineering and underground structures, landslides and related hazards, and railway engineering and dynamics.

Frequent co-authors in their body of work include Chiara Smerzini, Manuela Vanini, Ilario Mazzieri, Marco Stupazzini, and Angela Chiecchio.

Key publication venues where Roberto Paolucci has contributed multiple papers include:

  • Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
  • Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
  • Earthquake Spectra
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Roberto Paolucci include:

  • BB-SPEEDset: A Validated Dataset of Broadband Near-Source Earthquake Ground Motions from 3D Physics-Based Numerical Simulations, 2021, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • Checking the site categorization criteria and amplification factors of the 2021 draft of Eurocode 8 Part 1-1, 2021, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Other influential works related to their field, authored by collaborators, include:

  • Selection and spectral matching of recorded ground motions for seismic fragility analyses, 2022, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
  • 3D Physics-Based Numerical Simulations of Ground Motion in Istanbul from Earthquakes along the Marmara Segment of the North Anatolian Fault, 2020, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • Physics-based probabilistic seismic hazard and loss assessment in large urban areas: A simplified application to Istanbul, 2020, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics

Roberto Paolucci has also contributed to book publications, including a title published by Frontiers Media:

  • New Challenges for Seismic Risk Mitigation in Urban Areas, 2022

Best Publications

  • Ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian strong motion database

    D. Bindi;F. Pacor;L. Luzi;R. Puglia

  • 2D and 3D elastic wave propagation by a pseudo-spectral domain decomposition method

    E. Faccioli;F. Maggio;R. Paolucci;A. Quarteroni

  • Amplification of earthquake ground motion by steep topographic irregularities

    Roberto Paolucci

  • Displacement Spectra for Long Periods

    Ezio Faccioli;Roberto Paolucci;Julien Rey

  • Seismic behaviour of shallow foundations : Shaking table experiments vs numerical modelling

    Roberto Paolucci;Masahiro Shirato;M. Tolga Yilmaz

  • Ground Motion Record Selection Based on Broadband Spectral Compatibility

    Chiara Smerzini;Carmine Galasso;Iunio Iervolino;Roberto Paolucci

  • SEISMIC BEARING CAPACITY OF SHALLOW STRIP FOUNDATIONS ON DRY SOILS

    Roberto Paolucci;Alain Pecker

  • Overview of the Italian strong Motion database ITACA 1.0

    Francesca Pacor;Roberto Paolucci;Lucia Luzi;Fabio Sabetta

  • Effect of underground cavities on surface earthquake ground motion under SH wave propagation

    C. Smerzini;J. Avilés;R. Paolucci;F. J. Sánchez-Sesma

  • Simplified evaluation of earthquake induced permanent displacements of shallow foundations

    R. Paolucci

  • Near-Fault Earthquake Ground-Motion Simulation in the Grenoble Valley by a High-Performance Spectral Element Code

    Marco Stupazzini;Roberto Paolucci;Heiner Igel

  • Fault rupture–foundation interaction: selected case histories

    E. Faccioli;I. Anastasopoulos;G. Gazetas;A. Callerio

  • LARGE-SCALE EXPERIMENTS ON NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS SUBJECTED TO STRONG EARTHQUAKES

    Masahiro Shirato;Tetsuya Kouno;Ryuichi Asai;Shoichi Nakatani

  • The 6 April 2009 Mw 6.3 L'Aquila (Central Italy) Earthquake: Strong-motion Observations

    Gabriele Ameri;Marco Massa;Dino Bindi;Ezio D'Alema

  • Numerical analyses of fault-foundation interaction

    I. Anastasopoulos;A. Callerio;M. F. Bransby;M. C. R. Davies

  • 3D Response analysis of an instrumented hill at Matsuzaki, Japan, by a spectral method

    Roberto Paolucci;Ezio Faccioli;Fabio Maggio

  • Numerical prediction of low-frequency ground vibrations induced by high-speed trains at Ledsgaard, Sweden

    R. Paolucci;A. Maffeis;L. Scandella;M. Stupazzini

  • Record Processing in ITACA, the New Italian Strong-Motion Database

    R. Paolucci;F. Pacor;R. Puglia;G. Ameri

  • Recorded motions of the 6 April 2009 Mw 6.3 L'Aquila, Italy, earthquake and implications for building structural damage: Overview

    Mehmet Çelebi;Paolo Bazzurro;Lauro Chiaraluce;Paolo Clemente

  • Seismic analysis of deep tunnels in near fault conditions: a case study in Southern Italy

    Mirko Corigliano;Laura Scandella;Carlo G. Lai;Roberto Paolucci

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesca Pacor
Francesca Pacor National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
Lucia Luzi
Lucia Luzi National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
Iunio Iervolino
Iunio Iervolino University of Naples Federico II
Dino Bindi
Dino Bindi University of Potsdam
George Gazetas
George Gazetas National Technical University of Athens
Stefano Parolai
Stefano Parolai University of Trieste
Kyriazis Pitilakis
Kyriazis Pitilakis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Alfio Quarteroni
Alfio Quarteroni Polytechnic University of Milan
Francisco J. Sánchez-Sesma
Francisco J. Sánchez-Sesma National Autonomous University of Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths and educational opportunities. Many students complement their Earth Science background with skills in related fields to enhance their job prospects. For instance, creative professionals may explore programs like best online photography degree programs for veterans to specialize in environmental photography or documentation.

Language skills also play a significant role in global environmental work. Pursuing best online spanish degree programs for veterans enables Earth Science graduates to communicate effectively in Spanish-speaking regions, which is vital for international research and collaboration.

For those interested in shorter, cost-effective education paths with strong earning potential, exploring spanish degrees online offers a strategic advantage, blending language learning with scientific expertise.

Additionally, creative students might find value in online mfa programs, which provide advanced training in fine arts and can be tailored toward environmental art, scientific visualization, or media communication careers.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Paolucci

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles