World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
108
Citations
55948
World Ranking
5909
National Ranking
3168

Thomas J. Brady publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Brady sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 534 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas J. Brady D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Brady sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas J. Brady is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their academic contributions involve various collaborations with multiple co-authors across different research projects.

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Candies Winfun-Cook
  • Joel Amidon
  • S. Gilbert
  • Kathryn Amidon

Despite the absence of detailed records on recent papers, publication venues, book publications, fields, subfields, and main topics of study in the available data, the connection with Harvard University suggests involvement in a dynamic research environment.

The data does not indicate any awards or honors received by Thomas J. Brady, nor any specific research areas or subjects explored through publications. Similarly, no information is available on citation counts, paper titles, or venues of publication.

Based on the information supplied, Thomas J. Brady's profile centers primarily around active academic collaboration, underscored by relationships with a range of co-authors involved in their research projects.

Best Publications

  • Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

    Kenneth K. Kwong;John W. Belliveau;David A. Chesler;Inna E. Goldberg

  • Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging

    J. W. Belliveau;D. N. Kennedy;R. C. McKinstry;B. R. Buchbinder

  • Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging

    R. B. H. Tootell;J. B. Reppas;K. K. Kwong;R. Malach

  • Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents

    Bruce R. Rosen;John W. Belliveau;James M. Vevea;Thomas J. Brady

  • Detection of Calcified and Noncalcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Contrast-Enhanced, Submillimeter Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography A Segment-Based Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound

    Stephan Achenbach;Fabian Moselewski;Dieter Ropers;Maros Ferencik

  • In Vivo 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Provides a Noninvasive Measure of Carotid Plaque Inflammation in Patients

    Ahmed Tawakol;Raymond Q. Migrino;Gregory G. Bashian;Shahinaz Bedri

  • Dynamic imaging with lanthanide chelates in normal brain: contrast due to magnetic susceptibility effects.

    A. Villringer;B. R. Rosen;J. W. Belliveau;J. L. Ackerman

  • Noninvasive Assessment of Plaque Morphology and Composition in Culprit and Stable Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stable Lesions in Stable Angina by Multidetector Computed Tomography

    Udo Hoffmann;Fabian Moselewski;Koen Nieman;Ik Kyung Jang

  • Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging

    Roger B. H. Tootell;John B. Reppas;Anders M. Dale;Rodney B. Look

  • Functional cerebral imaging by susceptibility-contrast NMR.

    John W. Belliveau;Bruce R. Rosen;Howard L. Kantor;Richard R. Rzedzian

  • Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Absence of Coronary Artery Calcification

    Ammar Sarwar;Leslee J. Shaw;Michael D. Shapiro;Ron Blankstein

  • Monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds (MION): physicochemical properties.

    Tueng Shen;Tueng Shen;Ralph Weissleder;Ralph Weissleder;Mikhail Papisov;Mikhail Papisov;Alexei Bogdanov;Alexei Bogdanov

  • Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: an intravenous contrast agent for assessing lymph nodes with MR imaging.

    R Weissleder;G Elizondo;J Wittenberg;A S Lee

  • Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Early Triage of Patients With Acute Chest Pain: The ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) Trial

    Udo Hoffmann;Fabian Bamberg;Claudia U. Chae;John H. Nichols

  • Predictive Value of 16-Slice Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography to Detect Significant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Artery Disease: Patient- Versus Segment-Based Analysis

    Udo Hoffmann;Fabian Moselewski;Ricardo C. Cury;Maros Ferencik

  • Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

    P.F.J. New;B.R. Rosen;T.J. Brady;F.S. Buonanno

  • assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography

    Stephan Achenbach;Dieter Ropers;Udo Hoffmann;Briain MacNeill

  • Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography.

    Ron Blankstein;Ron Blankstein;Leon D. Shturman;Ian S. Rogers;Jose A. Rocha-Filho

  • MR Contrast Due to Microscopically Heterogeneous Magnetic Susceptibility: Numerical Simulations and Applications to Cerebral Physiology

    C R Fisel;J L Ackerman;R B Buxton;L Garrido

  • Coronary Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Patients With Acute Chest Pain

    Udo Hoffmann;John T. Nagurney;Fabian Moselewski;Antonio Pena

Frequent Co-Authors

Udo Hoffmann
Udo Hoffmann Harvard University
Suhny Abbara
Suhny Abbara The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Bruce R. Rosen
Bruce R. Rosen Harvard University
Stephan Achenbach
Stephan Achenbach University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Ron Blankstein
Ron Blankstein Brigham and Women's Hospital
Ralph Weissleder
Ralph Weissleder Harvard University
Alexei A. Bogdanov
Alexei A. Bogdanov University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Ik-Kyung Jang
Ik-Kyung Jang Massachusetts General Hospital
Gerald M. Pohost
Gerald M. Pohost University of Southern California
Van J. Wedeen
Van J. Wedeen Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn't always mean taking the traditional MD route. There are flexible, affordable online options if you want to work in healthcare, support patients, or contribute to medical systems.

For those interested in managing digital health records, earning a health information management degree online can offer excellent career prospects. If you’re detail-oriented and want a quicker entry into healthcare, consider researching how much is medical billing and coding school—many programs are affordable and lead to in-demand jobs.

Nursing remains a popular and rewarding option. Aspiring nurse practitioners can explore cheap online fnp programs to advance their qualifications online. If you want to become a registered nurse quickly, check out the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs.

With a variety of accredited online degrees available, you can find a pathway that suits your goals, budget, and timeline—bringing you closer to a healthcare career without the traditional campus experience.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Brady

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles