World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
86
Citations
37650
World Ranking
754
National Ranking
13

Noam Nisan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Noam Nisan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 240 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Noam Nisan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Noam Nisan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Noam Nisan is affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel and has made contributions mainly in the fields of Computer Science and Decision Sciences. Their research spans subfields including Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Economics and Econometrics, Artificial Intelligence, and Safety Research.

Their work covers a wide range of topics, with a focus on:

  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Economic theories and models
  • Game Theory and Applications
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Advanced Graph Theory Research

Noam Nisan has published extensively, with a selection of recent papers including:

  • "Auctions between Regret-Minimizing Agents", 2022, Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
  • "The menu-size complexity of revenue approximation", 2021, Games and Economic Behavior
  • "Competitive Equilibrium with Indivisible Goods and Generic Budgets", 2021, Mathematics of Operations Research
  • "How and Why to Manipulate Your Own Agent: On the Incentives of Users of Learning Agents", 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "The Demand Query Model for Bipartite Matching", 2021, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks

Their publication venues show a recurring presence in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
  • Games and Economic Behavior
  • Mathematics of Operations Research
  • Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks

Noam Nisan has coauthored frequently with other researchers such as:

  • Yannai A. Gonczarowski
  • Yoav Kolumbus
  • Moshe Babaioff
  • Matan Gilboa
  • Gal Beniamini

In addition to papers, they have contributed to book publications such as "Mathematical Logic through Python", published in 2022 by Cambridge University Press.

Best Publications

  • Communication Complexity

    Eyal Kushilevitz;Noam Nisan

  • Algorithmic Game Theory: Quantifying the Inefficiency of Equilibria

    Noam Nisan;Tim Roughgarden;Eva Tardos;Vijay V. Vazirani

  • Algorithmic Mechanism Design

    Noam Nisan;Noam Nisan;Amir Ronen

  • Algorithmic Game Theory: Computing in Games

    Noam Nisan;Tim Roughgarden;Eva Tardos;Vijay V. Vazirani

  • Hardness vs randomness

    Noam Nisan;Avi Wigderson

  • Fairplay—a secure two-party computation system

    Dahlia Malkhi;Noam Nisan;Benny Pinkas;Yaron Sella

  • Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems

    Carsten Lund;Lance Fortnow;Howard Karloff;Noam Nisan

  • Constant depth circuits, Fourier transform, and learnability

    Nathan Linial;Yishay Mansour;Noam Nisan

  • Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities

    Benny Lehmann;Daniel J. Lehmann;Noam Nisan

  • Randomness is linear in space

    N. Nisan;D. Zuckerman

  • Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions

    Noam Nisan

  • FairplayMP: a system for secure multi-party computation

    Assaf Ben-David;Noam Nisan;Benny Pinkas

  • Pseudorandom generators for space-bounded computation

    Noam Nisan

  • Algorithmic mechanism design (extended abstract)

    Noam Nisan;Amir Ronen

  • Computationally feasible VCG mechanisms

    Noam Nisan;Amir Ronen

  • On the degree of Boolean functions as real polynomials

    Noam Nisan;Mario Szegedy

  • Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Auctions with Complement-Free Bidders

    Shahar Dobzinski;Noam Nisan;Michael Schapira

  • Truthful approximation mechanisms for restricted combinatorial auctions

    Ahuva Mu'alem;Noam Nisan

  • Quantum circuits with mixed states

    Dorit Aharonov;Alexei Kitaev;Noam Nisan

  • Communication Complexity: Index of Notation

    Eyal Kushilevitz;Noam Nisan

  • Psuedorandom Generators for Space-Bounded Computation

    Noam Nisan

Frequent Co-Authors

Avi Wigderson
Avi Wigderson Institute for Advanced Study
Shahar Dobzinski
Shahar Dobzinski Weizmann Institute of Science
Eyal Kushilevitz
Eyal Kushilevitz Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Yishay Mansour
Yishay Mansour Tel Aviv University
Michal Feldman
Michal Feldman Tel Aviv University
Michael Schapira
Michael Schapira Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Tim Roughgarden
Tim Roughgarden Columbia University
László Babai
László Babai University of Chicago
Nathan Linial
Nathan Linial Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Sergiu Hart
Sergiu Hart Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up numerous pathways in Computer Science and beyond. Many students start with foundational credentials like an associate degree online, which offers fast, flexible entry points into the tech workforce. These programs are ideal for those seeking quick upskilling or a step toward a bachelor’s degree.

For those interested in education or leadership roles, the shortest online edd programs provide an accelerated route to advanced expertise, with flexible pacing suitable for busy professionals.

Affordability is a top concern for many learners. Thankfully, there are affordable doctoral programs that offer high academic value at a lower cost, making it easier to reach the highest level of education without excessive debt.

Additionally, students from all backgrounds often consider the tech-side of commerce, with affordable online business degree options available. These can open doors in management, entrepreneurship, or tech-driven business roles.

Best Scientists Citing Noam Nisan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles