World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
10376
World Ranking
8659
National Ranking
149

Ronald de Wolf publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald de Wolf sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 117 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ronald de Wolf D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald de Wolf sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald de Wolf is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and specializes primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research contributions span multiple subfields, with a strong focus on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, as well as Statistics and Probability. Additional areas of interest include Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics.

Their extensive publication record reflects interdisciplinary expertise, incorporating aspects of machine learning, quantum computing, and cryptography. The scientist's primary topics of research include Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture, Quantum Information and Cryptography, Machine Learning and Algorithms, Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs, Computability and Logic in AI Algorithms, Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques, and Cryptography and Data Security.

Ronald de Wolf has contributed to several notable papers, including:

  • Overview of the first Wendelstein 7-X long pulse campaign with fully water-cooled plasma facing components, 2024, Nuclear Fusion
  • Improved Bounds on Fourier Entropy and Min-entropy, 2021, ACM Transactions on Computation Theory
  • Two new results about quantum exact learning, 2021, Quantum
  • Quantum Coupon Collector, 2020, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Bayesian approach to parameter estimation and model validation for nuclear fusion reactor mean-field edge turbulence modelling, 2021, Nuclear Fusion

The venues where Ronald de Wolf frequently publishes include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Quantum
  • Nuclear Fusion
  • ACM Transactions on Computation Theory

Frequent co-authors working alongside Ronald de Wolf are:

  • Sourav Chakraborty
  • Nikhil S. Mande
  • Srinivasan Arunachalam
  • Manaswi Paraashar
  • Yanlin Chen

Their research is characterized by intersections between quantum algorithm design, information theory, and machine learning methodologies. The presence of significant work in nuclear fusion as reflected in some publications indicates a multidisciplinary approach encompassing both theoretical computer science and applied physics domains.

Best Publications

  • Quantum fingerprinting

    Harry Buhrman;Richard Cleve;John Watrous;Ronald de Wolf

  • Quantum lower bounds by polynomials

    Robert Beals;Harry Buhrman;Richard Cleve;Michele Mosca

  • Complexity measures and decision tree complexity: a survey

    Harry Buhrman;Ronald de Wolf

  • Foundations of inductive logic programming

    Shan-Hwei Nienhuys-Cheng;Ronald de Wolf;J. Siekmann;J. G. Carbonell

  • Nonlocality and communication complexity

    Harry Buhrman;Richard R. Cleve;Serge Massar;Ronald De Wolf

  • Algorithmic Clustering of Music Based on String Compression

    Rudi Cilibrasi;Paul Vitányi;Paul Vitányi;Ronald De Wolf

  • Private quantum channels

    A. Ambainis;M. Mosca;A. Tapp;R. De Wolf

  • Exponential lower bound for 2-query locally decodable codes via a quantum argument

    Iordanis Kerenidis;Ronald de Wolf

  • Linear vs. semidefinite extended formulations: exponential separation and strong lower bounds

    Samuel Fiorini;Serge Massar;Sebastian Pokutta;Hans Raj Tiwary

  • Quantum lower bounds by polynomials

    R. Beals;H. Buhrman;R. Cleve;M. Mosca

  • Exponential separations for one-way quantum communication complexity, with applications to cryptography

    Dmitry Gavinsky;Julia Kempe;Iordanis Kerenidis;Ran Raz

  • Guest Column: A Survey of Quantum Learning Theory

    Srinivasan Arunachalam;Ronald de Wolf

  • Quantum SDP-Solvers: Better Upper and Lower Bounds

    Joran Van Apeldoorn;Andras Gilyen;Sander Gribling;Ronald de Wolf

  • A Brief Introduction to Fourier Analysis on the Boolean Cube.

    Ronald de Wolf

  • Quantum algorithms for element distinctness

    H. Buhrman;C. Durr;M. Heiligman;P. Hoyer

  • Bounds for small-error and zero-error quantum algorithms

    H. Buhrman;R. Cleve;R. De Wolf;C. Zalka

  • Exponential Lower Bounds for Polytopes in Combinatorial Optimization

    Samuel Fiorini;Serge Massar;Sebastian Pokutta;Hans Raj Tiwary

  • Communication complexity lower bounds by polynomials

    H. Buhrman;R. de Wolf

  • Quantum search on bounded-error inputs

    Peter Høyer;Michele Mosca;Ronald De Wolf

  • A Survey of Quantum Property Testing

    Ashley Montanaro;Ronald de Wolf

  • Exponential Separation for One-Way Quantum Communication Complexity, with Applications to Cryptography

    Dmitry Gavinsky;Julia Kempe;Iordanis Kerenidis;Ran Raz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Computer Science but looking for flexible or accelerated options, there are several online degree pathways to consider. Many US institutions offer the shortest masters degree programs online, allowing you to earn a postgraduate qualification in as little as one year. These fast-track degrees can help you advance your career without pausing your professional life.

Choosing the right program is also crucial to your future prospects. Exploring the most valuable masters degrees can guide you toward fields with high demand and competitive salaries. Computer Science consistently ranks among these in-demand specializations.

For those seeking to start sooner or explore career changes, 1 year associate degree programs online provide a quick entry point into technology roles. These programs offer foundational skills for junior positions or pathway credits leading to a full bachelor’s degree.

Finally, affordability remains a key concern for many students. Fortunately, there are numerous cheap online colleges offering recognized degrees in Computer Science and related fields, making quality education more accessible than ever.

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles