What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Cognition
- Social psychology
- Artificial intelligence
Wim De Neys spends much of his time researching Cognitive psychology, Heuristic, Cognitive science, Social psychology and Cognition.
A large part of his Cognitive psychology studies is devoted to Cued speech.
Wim De Neys integrates several fields in his works, including Heuristic and Sketch.
His work deals with themes such as Credence, Feeling, Logical disjunction and Cognitive bias, which intersect with Cognitive science.
His Social psychology study frequently links to related topics such as Focus.
The Working memory research Wim De Neys does as part of his general Cognition study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Notice and Mistake, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.
His most cited work include:
- Dual Processing in Reasoning Two Systems but One Reasoner (371 citations)
- Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. (260 citations)
- Bias and Conflict A Case for Logical Intuitions (197 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Wim De Neys mostly deals with Cognitive psychology, Social psychology, Cognition, Cued speech and Cognitive science.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Working memory, Heuristic, Cognitive load, Modus ponens and Normative.
His Social psychology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Rationality and Morality.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Syllogism, Semantic reasoner and Logical reasoning in addition to Cognition.
His research in Cued speech intersects with topics in Developmental psychology, Control and Sensitivity.
His study looks at the relationship between Cognitive science and topics such as Conditional reasoning, which overlap with Logical rules, Behavioral study and Electroencephalography.
He most often published in these fields:
- Cognitive psychology (67.86%)
- Social psychology (45.71%)
- Cognition (30.00%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Cognitive psychology (67.86%)
- Deliberation (5.71%)
- Ball (4.29%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Cognitive psychology, Deliberation, Ball, DUAL and Dual process theory.
Wim De Neys works on Cognitive psychology which deals in particular with Cued speech.
His DUAL research includes elements of Inference and Intuition.
The various areas that Wim De Neys examines in his Dual process theory study include Empirical evidence, Form of the Good, Moral reasoning, Fallacy and Probabilistic logic.
His Cognitive load research incorporates themes from Adage and Morality.
His Heuristic research includes themes of Brain activation, Key and Cognitive bias.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The Smart System 1: evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem (31 citations)
- Logic, Fast and Slow: Advances in Dual-Process Theorizing: (30 citations)
- The intuitive greater good: Testing the corrective dual process model of moral cognition. (23 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Cognition
- Artificial intelligence
- Social psychology
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Deliberation, Ball, Dual process theory, DUAL and Artificial intelligence.
A majority of his Deliberation research is a blend of other scientific areas, such as Cognitive psychology, Human–computer interaction and Smart system.
His studies in Cognitive psychology integrate themes in fields like Cognitive load, Adage and Morality.
Wim De Neys combines subjects such as Cognitive science and Inference with his study of Dual process theory.
In his papers, he integrates diverse fields, such as Hybrid model and Cognition.
As part of his studies on Cognition, Wim De Neys frequently links adjacent subjects like Moral cognition.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
