World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
6461
World Ranking
9151
National Ranking
619

Henry Markovits publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry Markovits sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Henry Markovits D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry Markovits sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Henry Markovits is affiliated with the University of Quebec at Montreal in Canada. Their research focuses predominantly on psychology, with an emphasis on decision sciences and cognitive processes. Their work spans a range of subfields including general decision sciences, artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their research topics broadly cover decision-making and behavioral economics, cognitive science and mapping, child and animal learning development, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, neural and behavioral psychology studies, experimental behavioral economics studies, and evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Henry Markovits include:

  • Reasoning strategies predict use of very fast logical reasoning, 2020, Memory & Cognition
  • Girls exhibit greater empathy than boys following a minor accident, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Reasoning strategy vs cognitive capacity as predictors of individual differences in reasoning performance, 2021, Cognition
  • Reasoning strategies and semantic memory effects in deductive reasoning, 2020, Memory & Cognition
  • Reasoning strategies explain individual differences in social reasoning., 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Frequent collaborators with Markovits include Joyce F. Benenson, Gaëtan Béghin, Valerie A. Thompson, Janie Brisson, and Émilie Gagnon-St-Pierre.

Their research outputs have been frequently published in journals such as

  • Memory & Cognition
  • Journal of Cognitive Psychology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Cognition
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Best Publications

  • Conditionals: A Theory of Meaning, Pragmatics, and Inference

    Philip Johnson-Laird;Ruth M. J. Byrne

  • The Development of Conditional Reasoning: A Mental Model Account

    Henry Markovits;Pierre Barrouillet

  • The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions.

    Henry Markovits;Guilaine Nantel

  • The development of reasoning with causal conditionals.

    Geneviève Janveau-Brennan;Henry Markovits

  • Conditional reasoning, representation, and level of abstraction

    Henry Markovits;Robert Vachon

  • Social Exclusion: More Important to Human Females Than Males

    Joyce Frances Benenson;Henry Markovits;Brittney Hultgren;Tuyet Nguyen

  • The Development of Conditional Reasoning and the Structure of Semantic Memory

    Henry Markovits;Marie-Léda Fleury;Stéphane Quinn;Michèle Venet

  • Males' Greater Tolerance of Same-Sex Peers

    Joyce Frances Benenson;Joyce Frances Benenson;Henry Markovits;Caitlin Fitzgerald;Diana Geoffroy

  • Conditional reasoning, causality, and the structure of semantic memory: strength of association as a predictive factor for content effects

    Stéphane Quinn;Henry Markovits

  • Reasoning with contrary-to-fact propositions.

    Henry Markovits;Robert Vachon

  • Awareness of the ‘possible’ as a mediator of formal thinking in conditional reasoning problems

    Henry Markovits

  • Warriors and Worriers: The Survival of the Sexes

    Joyce F. Benenson;Henry Markovits

  • Evidence That Children and Adolescents Have Internal Models of Peer Interactions That Are Gender Differentiated

    Henry Markovits;Joyce Benenson;Eva Dolenszky

  • A mental model analysis of young children's conditional reasoning with meaningful premises

    Henry Markovits

  • The relation between accuracy of self‐perception and cognitive development

    Thérêse Bouffard;Henry Markovits;Carole Vezeau;Martine Boisvert

  • Individual differences in working memory and conditional reasoning with concrete and abstract content

    Henry Markovits;Celine Doyon;Michael Simoneau

  • Reasoning with premises that are not empirically true: evidence for the role of inhibition and retrieval.

    Michael Simoneau;Henry Markovits

  • Reasoning in Young Children: Fantasy and Information Retrieval

    Henry Markovits;Michele Venet;Geneviève Janveau‐Brennan;Nicole Malfait

  • Efficiency of retrieval correlates with “logical” reasoning from causal conditional premises

    Henry Markovits;Stéphane Quinn

  • Understanding Uncertainty with Abstract Conditional Premises

    Michele Venet;Henry Markovits

Frequent Co-Authors

Joyce F. Benenson
Joyce F. Benenson Harvard University
Richard W. Wrangham
Richard W. Wrangham Harvard University
Valerie A. Thompson
Valerie A. Thompson University of Saskatchewan
Pierre Barrouillet
Pierre Barrouillet University of Geneva
Olivier Klein
Olivier Klein Université Libre de Bruxelles
Beate Sodian
Beate Sodian Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Simon J. Handley
Simon J. Handley Macquarie University
Linden J. Ball
Linden J. Ball University of Central Lancashire
Wim De Neys
Wim De Neys Université Paris Cité
Donald L. Kramer
Donald L. Kramer McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens a wide array of online degree options and professional pathways across the USA. Many students start with a bachelor’s degree in psychology, then pursue graduate programs such as a master’s or doctoral degree to specialize in areas like counseling, clinical psychology, or school psychology.

If you're interested in becoming a licensed therapist, you should know that requirements vary by state and city. For example, those looking to meet the Seattle licensed therapist education requirements will need to fulfill specific graduate coursework and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, the licensed therapist requirements in Spokane also include state-approved examinations and practical experience.

In other locations like St. Louis, candidates should be aware of the St. Louis licensed therapist requirements, which may differ in coursework or licensure procedures. Likewise, those seeking licensure in Florida should review the St. Petersburg licensed therapist education requirements to ensure compliance with state regulations.

Online programs can make meeting these requirements more accessible, but it’s vital to research each state’s specific rules and opportunities for supervised practice before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Henry Markovits

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles