World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pierre Barrouillet

Pierre Barrouillet

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5189 4814 56 54 157 11196

Pierre Barrouillet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pierre Barrouillet between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pierre Barrouillet published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2018. 5 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2018. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1991 2025

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pierre Barrouillet: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 1
1997 3
1998 4
1999 2
2000 3
2001 3
2002 6
2003 3
2004 10
2005 3
2006 3
2007 6
2008 10
2009 8
2010 10
2011 9
2012 3
2013 10
2014 11
2015 6
2016 4
2017 9
2018 20
2019 6
2020 3
2021 5
2022 1
2023 1
2024 4
2025 1
Total 174
Download as CSV

Pierre Barrouillet publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Barrouillet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 157 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 157
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Pierre Barrouillet D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Barrouillet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pierre Barrouillet is affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on cognitive neuroscience and psychology, with a strong emphasis on experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main fields of study covered by their work are:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Within these fields, their subfields of specialty include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • General Psychology

The major topics addressed by their research encompass:

  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Recent scientific papers by Pierre Barrouillet include:

  • How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes From an Extended Adversarial Collaboration (2020), published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Simple spans underestimate verbal working memory capacity. (2020), published in Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Are small additions solved by direct retrieval from memory or automated counting procedures? A rejoinder to Chen and Campbell (2018) (2020), published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Strategic adaptation to dual-task in verbal working memory: Potential routes for theory integration. (2022), published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • What affects the magnitude of age-related dual-task costs in working memory? The role of stimulus domain and access to semantic representations (2020), published in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Pierre Barrouillet are:

  • Valérie Camos
  • Clément Belletier
  • Robert H. Logie
  • Nelson Cowan
  • Stephen Rhodes

The most frequent publication venues where their work appears include:

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Best Publications

  • Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans.

    Pierre Barrouillet;Sophie Bernardin;Valérie Camos

  • Time and cognitive load in working memory.

    Pierre Noël Barrouillet;Sophie Bernardin;Sophie Portrat;Evie Vergauwe

  • On the law relating processing to storage in working memory.

    Pierre Noël Barrouillet;Sophie Portrat;Valérie Camos

  • Working memory span development: a time-based resource-sharing model account.

    Pierre Noël Barrouillet;Nathalie Gavens;Evie Vergauwe;Vinciane Gaillard

  • Predicting arithmetical achievement from neuro-psychological performance: a longitudinal study

    Michel Fayol;Pierre Barrouillet;Catherine Marinthe

  • Mental Models in Conditional Reasoning and Working Memory

    Pierre Barrouillet;Jean-Francois Lecas

  • The Development of Conditional Reasoning: A Mental Model Account

    Henry Markovits;Pierre Barrouillet

  • Two maintenance mechanisms of verbal information in working memory

    Valérie Camos;Valérie Camos;Prune Lagner;Pierre Noël Barrouillet

  • Working memory and children’s use of retrieval to solve addition problems

    Pierre Barrouillet;Raphaelle Lépine

  • Do Mental Processes Share a Domain-General Resource?

    Evie Vergauwe;Pierre Noël Barrouillet;Valérie Camos;Valérie Camos

  • Developmental Increase in Working Memory Span: Resource Sharing or Temporal Decay? ☆

    Pierre Barrouillet;Valérie Camos

  • Theories of cognitive development: From Piaget to today

    Pierre Noël Barrouillet

  • Working Memory: Loss and reconstruction

    Pierre Barrouillet;Valérie Camos

  • Conditional reasoning by mental models: chronometric and developmental evidence.

    Pierre Barrouillet;Nelly Grosset;Jean-François Lecas

  • As Time Goes By Temporal Constraints in Working Memory

    Pierre Noël Barrouillet;Valérie Camos

  • Selecting between Competitors in Multiplication Tasks: An Explanation of the Errors Produced by Adolescents with Learning Difficulties

    Pierre Barrouillet;Michel Fayol;Eric Lathulière

  • The time-based resource-sharing model of working memory

    Pierre Barrouillet;Valérie Camos

  • Working Memory Costs of Task Switching.

    Baptist Liefooghe;Pierre Noël Barrouillet;André Vandierendonck;Valérie Camos

  • ADAPT: A Developmental, Asemantic, and Procedural Model for Transcoding From Verbal to Arabic Numerals

    Pierre Barrouillet;Valérie Camos;Pierre Perruchet;Xavier Seron

  • The impact of storage on processing: how is information maintained in working memory?

    Evie Vergauwe;Valérie Camos;Pierre Noël Barrouillet

  • How can mental models theory account for content effects in conditional reasoning? A developmental perspective

    Pierre Barrouillet;Jean-François Lecas

Frequent Co-Authors

Valérie Camos
Valérie Camos University of Fribourg
Michel Fayol
Michel Fayol University of Clermont Auvergne
Nelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan University of Missouri
Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Moshe Naveh-Benjamin University of Missouri
Robert H. Logie
Robert H. Logie University of Edinburgh
Henry Markovits
Henry Markovits University of Quebec at Montreal
Franck Ramus
Franck Ramus École Normale Supérieure
Pascal Huguet
Pascal Huguet University of Clermont Auvergne
Xavier Seron
Xavier Seron Université Catholique de Louvain
Vicki Anderson
Vicki Anderson Murdoch Children's Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens a wide range of online study options and diverse career pathways. For those seeking a quick start, an online associate degree psychology program provides foundational knowledge and can lead to entry-level positions or further study.

Many students advance to a bachelor's in psychology online, which offers a strong overview of psychological theories, research methods, and practical applications. This degree is ideal for those interested in roles such as case managers, human resources specialists, or preparing for graduate school.

If your interests lie in behavior modification and intervention, specialized programs are available as well. The online behavioral psychology programs focus on understanding and shaping behavior, an essential skill in various clinical and organizational settings.

For graduate-level specialization, the best online aba masters programs prepare professionals for careers in applied behavior analysis, supporting individuals with behavioral or developmental challenges. These programs lead to roles such as Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBA), therapists, and consultants.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre Barrouillet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles