World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip N. Johnson-Laird

Philip N. Johnson-Laird

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 92 857 750 543 464 345 76669

Philip N. Johnson-Laird publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip N. Johnson-Laird between 1964 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip N. Johnson-Laird published across 61 years, from 1964 to 2024, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2008. 10 of the 402 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2008. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 1 publication 1968: 4 publications 1969: 4 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 5 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 4 publications 1976: 12 publications 1977: 10 publications 1978: 9 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 11 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 31 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications
1964 2024

402 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip N. Johnson-Laird: publications per year, 1964 to 2024
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 1
1967 1
1968 4
1969 4
1970 4
1971 0
1972 5
1973 1
1974 1
1975 4
1976 12
1977 10
1978 9
1979 2
1980 3
1981 3
1982 5
1983 3
1984 7
1985 6
1986 5
1987 5
1988 6
1989 11
1990 4
1991 2
1992 8
1993 9
1994 6
1995 4
1996 5
1997 4
1998 7
1999 7
2000 14
2001 9
2002 13
2003 12
2004 8
2005 10
2006 9
2007 5
2008 31
2009 7
2010 11
2011 5
2012 11
2013 13
2014 6
2015 8
2016 5
2017 7
2018 5
2019 8
2020 12
2021 8
2022 6
2023 5
2024 5
Total 402
Download as CSV

Philip N. Johnson-Laird publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip N. Johnson-Laird sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–350 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 345 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85 345
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip N. Johnson-Laird D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip N. Johnson-Laird sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70 92
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 2007 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2004 - Mind & Brain Prize, University and Polytechnic of Turin
  • 1991 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • 1974 - Spearman Medal, British Psychological Society

Overview

Philip N. Johnson-Laird is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with significant work in subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences, and History and Philosophy of Science.

Their research topics cover areas including Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge, Philosophy and History of Science, Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference, Philosophy and Theoretical Science, Cognitive Science and Mapping, and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms.

Recent papers by Philip N. Johnson-Laird include:

  • How poetry evokes emotions, 2022, published in Acta Psychologica
  • Reasoning about properties: A computational theory, 2021, Psychological Review
  • Reasoning about epistemic possibilities, 2020, Acta Psychologica
  • Possibilities and the parallel meanings of factual and counterfactual conditionals, 2020, Memory & Cognition
  • The probability of conditionals: A review, 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated on multiple research projects are:

  • Sangeet Khemlani
  • Lindsey Drayton
  • Rolf Van Der Sanden
  • Patrick Scheffmann
  • Ralph Adolphs

Common publication venues for their work include:

  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Acta Psychologica
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Cognitive Psychology
  • Thinking & Reasoning

Throughout their career, Philip N. Johnson-Laird has received several awards such as the William James Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science in 2010, election as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 2007, the Mind & Brain Prize from the University and Polytechnic of Turin in 2004, Fellowship of the Royal Society in the United Kingdom in 1991, and the Spearman Medal from the British Psychological Society in 1974.

Best Publications

  • Mental models in cognitive science

    P. N. Johnson-Laird

  • Mental models

    P. N. Johnson-Laird

  • Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness

    Marilyn Ford;Philip N. Johnson-Laird

  • Language and Perception

    George Armitage Miller;Philip Johnson-Laird

  • Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content

    Peter Cathcart Wason;P. N. Johnson-Laird

  • Towards a Cognitive Theory of Emotions

    Keith Oatley;P. N. Johnson-laird

  • Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness

    P. N. Johnson-Laird

  • The Computer and the Mind : An Introduction to Cognitive Science

    Philip N. Johnson-Laird

  • The language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field

    P. N. Johnson-laird;Keith Oatley

  • Conditionals: A Theory of Meaning, Pragmatics, and Inference

    Philip Johnson-Laird;Ruth M. J. Byrne

  • How We Reason

    Philip N. Johnson-Laird

  • REASONING AND A SENSE OF REALITY

    P. N. Johnson-Laird;Paolo Legrenzi;Maria Sonino Legrenzi

  • Propositional reasoning by model.

    Philip N. Johnson-Laird;Ruth M. Byrne;Walter Schaeken

  • Basic emotions, rationality, and folk theory

    P. N. Johnson-laird;Keith Oatley

  • Mental models and human reasoning

    Philip N. Johnson-Laird

  • Mental models and deduction

    Philip N. Johnson-Laird

  • Thinking; Readings in Cognitive Science

    P. N. Johnson-Laird;Peter Cathcart. Wason

  • Naive Probability: A Mental Model Theory of Extensional Reasoning

    Philip Johnson-Laird;Paolo Legrenzi;Vittorio Girotto;Maria Sonino Legrenzi

  • How Diagrams Can Improve Reasoning

    Malcolm I. Bauer;P. N. Johnson-Laird

  • Focussing in reasoning and decision making

    P. Legrenzi;V. Girotto;Philip N. Johnson-Laird

  • Mental Models : Towards a Cognitive Science of Language

    P. N. Johnson-Laird

  • Mental Models : Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Interface, and Consciousness

    Philip N. Johnson-Laird

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruth M. J. Byrne
Ruth M. J. Byrne Trinity College Dublin
Vittorio Girotto
Vittorio Girotto Università Iuav di Venezia
Keith Oatley
Keith Oatley University of Toronto
Geoffrey P. Goodwin
Geoffrey P. Goodwin University of Pennsylvania
George A. Miller
George A. Miller Princeton University
Jane Oakhill
Jane Oakhill University of Sussex
Eldar Shafir
Eldar Shafir Princeton University
Alan Garnham
Alan Garnham University of Sussex
Uri Hasson
Uri Hasson Princeton University
Earl Hunt
Earl Hunt University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree programs and career pathways, including school counseling, clinical psychology, and behavioral therapy. Many students choose to specialize further, often with the goal of supporting students within school systems.

Requirements for school counselors can vary widely by state. For example, those interested in working in Alabama should review the Alabama school counselor education requirements. In Alaska, aspiring professionals must follow the specific Alaska school counselor education requirements. If you plan to work in Arizona, ensure you meet the Arizona school counselor education requirements. Additionally, it's important to understand the requirements to be a school counselor in Arkansas if you wish to practice there.

Online psychology degrees often offer the flexibility needed to meet these state requirements while balancing work and personal commitments. Be sure to confirm that your chosen program aligns with the licensure and certification standards for your intended state and career path.

Best Scientists Citing Philip N. Johnson-Laird

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles