World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 73 1935 1750 218 203 208 24846

Jane Oakhill publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jane Oakhill between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jane Oakhill published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2013. 5 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2013. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 11 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 6 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1976 2025

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jane Oakhill: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 2
1983 3
1984 5
1985 4
1986 6
1987 2
1988 5
1989 7
1990 2
1991 5
1992 7
1993 8
1994 3
1995 1
1996 11
1997 1
1998 6
1999 3
2000 8
2001 1
2002 2
2003 4
2004 6
2005 8
2006 4
2007 6
2008 9
2009 3
2010 0
2011 3
2012 7
2013 16
2014 14
2015 11
2016 3
2017 2
2018 8
2019 7
2020 9
2021 8
2022 2
2023 3
2024 3
2025 2
Total 231
Download as CSV

Jane Oakhill publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Oakhill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 208 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 208
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jane Oakhill D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Oakhill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 73
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jane Oakhill is affiliated with the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with particular expertise in Developmental and Educational Psychology, Gender Studies, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education, and Statistics and Probability.

The scientist's work centers on topics such as Reading and Literacy Development, Cognitive and Developmental Aspects of Mathematical Skills, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Hearing Impairment and Communication, Educational Strategies and Epistemologies, Gender Roles and Identity Studies, and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition.

Notable recent publications by Jane Oakhill include:

  • Four Decades of Research into Children's Reading Comprehension: A Personal Review (2020, Discourse Processes)
  • Activation of Person Knowledge in Medial Prefrontal Cortex during the Encoding of New Lifelike Events (2021, Cerebral Cortex)
  • The development of explicit occupational gender stereotypes in children: Comparing perceived gender ratios and competence beliefs (2022, Journal of Vocational Behavior)
  • "This Is What a Mechanic Sounds Like": Children's Vocal Control Reveals Implicit Occupational Stereotypes (2020, Psychological Science)
  • Tracking your emotions: An eye-tracking study on reader's engagement with perspective during text comprehension (2020, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology)

Jane Oakhill frequently publishes in certain academic journals, including:

  • Discourse Processes
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Education 3-13

The scientist has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, notable among them:

  • Alan Garnham
  • David Reby
  • Robin Banerjee
  • Valentina Cartei
  • Petar Raykov

Jane Oakhill's research contributions provide insights into literacy development and the cognitive underpinnings of learning, as well as the influence of gender stereotypes and social factors on occupational perceptions and communication.

Best Publications

  • Children's Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills.

    Kate Cain;Jane Oakhill;Peter Bryant

  • The Acquisition of Reading Comprehension Skill

    Charles A. Perfetti;Nicole Landi;Jane Oakhill

  • Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children

    Kate Cain;Jane V. Oakhill

  • Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge.

    Kate Cain;Jane V. Oakhill;Marcia A. Barnes;Marcia A. Barnes;Peter E. Bryant

  • Children's Problems in Text Comprehension: An Experimental Investigation

    Nicola Yuill;Jane Oakhill

  • The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills

    Jane V. Oakhill;Kate Cain;Peter E. Bryant

  • Individual Differences in the Inference of Word Meanings From Context: The Influence of Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Knowledge, and Memory Capacity.

    Kate Cain;Jane Oakhill;Kate Lemmon

  • The Precursors of Reading Ability in Young Readers: Evidence From a Four-Year Longitudinal Study

    Jane V. Oakhill;Kate Cain

  • Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties

    Kate Cain;Jane Oakhill

  • Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension.

    Alix Seigneuric;Marie-France Ehrlich;Jane V. Oakhill;Nicola M. Yuill

  • INFERENTIAL AND MEMORY SKILLS IN CHILDREN'S COMPREHENSION OF STORIES

    Jane Oakhill

  • Working memory, comprehension ability and the resolution of text anomaly

    Nicola Yuill;Jane Oakhill;Alan Parkin

  • Levels of Comprehension Monitoring and Working Memory in Good and Poor Comprehenders

    Jane Oakhill;Joanne Hartt;Deborah Samols

  • Thinking and Reasoning

    Alan Garnham;Jane Oakhill

  • Matthew Effects in Young Readers Reading Comprehension and Reading Experience Aid Vocabulary Development

    Kate Cain;Jane Oakhill

  • Children's comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective

    Kate Cain;Jane Oakhill

  • Higher Order Factors in Comprehension Disability: Processes and Remediation

    Jane Oakhill;Nicola Yuill

  • Becoming a skilled reader

    Jane Oakhill;Alan Garnham

  • Understanding and Teaching Reading Comprehension: A handbook

    Jane V. Oakhill;Kate Cain;Carsten Elbro

  • The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without language comprehension difficulties

    Kate Cain;Jane V. Oakhill;Carsten Elbro

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan Garnham
Alan Garnham University of Sussex
Kate Cain
Kate Cain Lancaster University
Nicola Yuill
Nicola Yuill University of Sussex
Philip N. Johnson-Laird
Philip N. Johnson-Laird Princeton University
Peter Bryant
Peter Bryant University of Oxford
Robin Banerjee
Robin Banerjee University of Sussex
Manuel Carreiras
Manuel Carreiras Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language
Sabine Sczesny
Sabine Sczesny University of Bern
Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Morton Ann Gernsbacher University of Wisconsin–Madison
Alan J. Parkin
Alan J. Parkin University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a variety of career pathways, from counseling and research to education and business roles. One of the top concerns for students is affordability, and there are numerous programs across the U.S. that balance quality with accessible tuition rates.

For those considering a specific location, you’ll find affordable psychology degrees in Tuscaloosa, ideal for students in Alabama. If you’re residing in the Lone Star State, there are many affordable psychology degrees in Texas with online options to meet diverse learning needs.

For students in Pennsylvania, consider the range of affordable psychology programs in University Park. Meanwhile, anyone focused on cost-efficiency should review the cheapest psychology degrees in Utah, offering reputable online programs at lower tuition.

By choosing an affordable online psychology degree, you can build a rewarding career in human services, clinical practice, or other psychology-related fields while minimizing financial stress.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Oakhill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles