What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Management
- Marketing
- Social science
His scientific interests lie mostly in Regional science, Marketing, Industrial organization, Knowledge economy and Process.
His Regional science research includes themes of Systems of innovation, Internationalization and Corporate governance.
His Outsourcing and Knowledge process outsourcing study in the realm of Marketing interacts with subjects such as Technological change and Multiple time dimensions.
Dimension, Key factors, Key, Intermediation and Context are fields of study that intersect with his Industrial organization study.
His Process study combines topics in areas such as Knowledge management, Consumption, Knowledge spillover and Economic geography.
He has included themes like Intermediary, Innovation intermediary, Innovation process and Field in his Economy study.
His most cited work include:
- Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation (1217 citations)
- Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography (579 citations)
- Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Transfer. (343 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Industrial organization, Knowledge management, Marketing, Globalization and Context.
His studies deal with areas such as Tertiary sector of the economy and Process as well as Industrial organization.
Process is closely attributed to Outsourcing in his study.
Jeremy Howells usually deals with Knowledge management and limits it to topics linked to Intermediary and Empirical evidence.
His work in the fields of Open innovation and Knowledge process outsourcing overlaps with other areas such as Key.
Jeremy Howells integrates many fields, such as Context, Innovation process, Regional development, Technological change, Internationalization and Public relations, in his works.
He most often published in these fields:
- Industrial organization (21.74%)
- Knowledge management (18.48%)
- Marketing (14.13%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2020)?
- Perspective (10.87%)
- Knowledge management (18.48%)
- Value (4.35%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Jeremy Howells spends much of his time researching Perspective, Knowledge management, Value, Open innovation and Higher education.
In his research, Innovation system is intimately related to Empirical evidence, which falls under the overarching field of Knowledge management.
His Value research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Capital, Economic impact analysis and Marketing.
His research investigates the link between Economic impact analysis and topics such as Counterintuitive that cross with problems in Industrial organization.
Jeremy Howells focuses mostly in the field of Open innovation, narrowing it down to matters related to Institution and, in some cases, Regional science.
His study in Higher education is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Corporate governance, Task and Global education.
Between 2011 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Innovation and university collaboration: paradox and complexity within the knowledge economy (90 citations)
- The geography of knowledge: never so close but never so far apart (86 citations)
- Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: knowledge-based practices and internal value creation (71 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Management
- Social science
- Marketing
Jeremy Howells mostly deals with Economic geography, Strategic geography, Value, Innovation theory and Critical geography.
His Value study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Innovation system, Intermediary, Empirical evidence and Knowledge management.
His research on Innovation theory frequently links to adjacent areas such as Urban agglomeration.
In his research, Jeremy Howells performs multidisciplinary study on Critical geography and Key.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
