World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 36 6344 5896 378 362 97 12171

Nabil Amara publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nabil Amara between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nabil Amara published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2013. 5 of the 108 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2013. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1990 2025

108 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nabil Amara: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 3
1999 3
2000 2
2001 3
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 4
2007 7
2008 4
2009 6
2010 2
2011 2
2012 7
2013 10
2014 3
2015 3
2016 6
2017 3
2018 5
2019 1
2020 5
2021 5
2022 3
2023 5
2024 2
2025 3
Total 108
Download as CSV

Nabil Amara publications per year - data summary

  • Nabil Amara, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Université Laval, has 108 publications recorded across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1990 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 10 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1990 and 2019, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 36 years in the span carry no publications at all (1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.7 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 18 publications, 17% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1990-2001: 12 publications (1.0 per year); 2002-2013: 52 publications (4.3 per year); 2014-2025: 44 publications (3.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Nabil Amara publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nabil Amara sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 97 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 97
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Nabil Amara publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Nabil Amara, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Université Laval, records 97 publications - the 12th percentile of the discipline.
  • 12% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Nabil Amara, and about 88% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Nabil Amara ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Nabil Amara D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nabil Amara sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261 36
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Nabil Amara D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Nabil Amara, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Université Laval, records 36 D-Index - the 19th percentile of the discipline.
  • 19% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Nabil Amara, and about 81% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Nabil Amara ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Nabil Amara is affiliated with Université Laval in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, and Social Sciences. Within these broad domains, key subfields of their work include Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, as well as Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty.

The topics that frequently appear in Amara's research cover a diverse range relating to innovation, management, and social sciences. Notable topics include:

  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
  • Cultural Industries and Urban Development
  • Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Scientometrics and Bibliometrics Research
  • Art History and Market Analysis
  • Management and Organizational Studies

Amara has published recent research articles in various academic journals. Some selected papers are:

  • "Art of innovating in the arts: definitions, determinants, and mode of innovation in creative industries, a systematic review" (2022), published in Review of Managerial Science
  • "Greening the workplace through supervisory behaviors: assessing what really matters to employees" (2020), published in The International Journal of Human Resource Management
  • "Toward a Population-Based Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Approach? The Needs and Concerns of Healthcare Providers" (2021), published in Journal of Personalized Medicine
  • "Fairly assessing unfairness: An exploration of gender disparities in informal entrepreneurship amongst academics in business schools" (2021), published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • "Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data" (2020), published in Scientometrics

The researcher frequently publishes in the Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, contributing three papers there. Other publication venues include the International Journal of Materials and Product Technology, Review of Managerial Science, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, and Journal of Personalized Medicine.

Amara commonly collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Norrin Halilem
  • Paulin Gohoungodji
  • Mehdi Rhaiem
  • Khalil Rhaiem
  • Amélie Cloutier

Best Publications

  • Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003

    Nizar Becheikh;Réjean Landry;Nabil Amara

  • Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent?

    Réjean Landry;Nabil Amara;Moktar Lamari

  • Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada.

    Réjean Landry;Nabil Amara;Moktar Lamari

  • New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual, and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies

    Nabil Amara;Mathieu Ouimet;RÉjean Landry

  • Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey

    Nabil Amara;Réjean Landry

  • The Extent and Determinants of the Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies

    Réjean Landry;Moktar Lamari;Nabil Amara

  • Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities

    Réjean Landry;Nabil Amara;Imad Rherrad

  • Climbing the Ladder of Research Utilization: Evidence from Social Science Research

    Réjean Landry;Nabil Amara;Moktar Lamari

  • Determinants of knowledge transfer: evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering

    Réjean Landry;Nabil Amara;Mathieu Ouimet

  • Managing the protection of innovations in knowledge-intensive business services

    Nabil Amara;Réjean Landry;Namatié Traoré

  • Learning and novelty of innovation in established manufacturing SMEs

    Nabil Amara;Réjean Landry;Nizar Becheikh;Mathieu Ouimet

  • Disentangling competences: Interrelationships on creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship

    Mónica Edwards-Schachter;Ana García-Granero;Mabel Sánchez-Barrioluengo;Henry Quesada-Pineda

  • Patterns of innovation in knowledge-intensive business services

    Nabil Amara;Réjean Landry;David Doloreux

  • The knowledge-value chain: a conceptual framework for knowledge translation in health

    Réjean Landry;Nabil Amara;Ariel Pablos-Mendes;Ramesh Shademani

  • On-farm adoption of conservation practices: the role of farm and farmer characteristics, perceptions, and health hazards

    N. Traore;R. Landry;N. Amara

  • Evidence on how academics manage their portfolio of knowledge transfer activities

    Réjean Landry;Malek Saïhi;Nabil Amara;Mathieu Ouimet

  • The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research

    Réjean Landry;Nabil Amara

  • The Extent and Organizational Determinants of Research Utilization in Canadian Health Services Organizations

    Omar Belkhodja;Nabil Amara;Réjean Landry;Mathieu Ouimet

  • Technology transfer organizations: Services and business models

    Réjean Landry;Nabil Amara;Jean-Samuel Cloutier;Norrin Halilem

  • Learning from innovation failures: a systematic review of the literature and research agenda

    Khalil Rhaiem;Nabil Amara

  • Counting citations in the field of business and management: why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science

    Nabil Amara;Réjean Landry

Frequent Co-Authors

Réjean Landry
Réjean Landry Université Laval
Jacques Simard
Jacques Simard Université Laval
David Doloreux
David Doloreux HEC Montréal
Pascal Paillé
Pascal Paillé NEOMA Business School
John N. Lavis
John N. Lavis McMaster University
Olivier Boiral
Olivier Boiral Université Laval

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens up diverse options for online study, each tailored to different interests and career goals. If you’re seeking practical, people-focused paths, consider masters in social work accelerated programs. These programs offer a fast track to impactful roles in community organizations and healthcare—ideal if you’re keen on making a quick transition into the workforce.

For those drawn to understanding human behavior, an online accelerated psychology degree provides flexible, high-quality training, equipping you for careers in counseling, research, or organizational development.

Specialized accreditation matters for long-term professional goals. If counseling is your focus, look for cacrep accredited programs online, which ensure your education meets industry standards—essential for licensure and employment.

Interested in supporting families and couples? Accredited marriage and family therapy online programs accredited deliver specialized skills employers recognize while offering the flexibility of distance learning.

Best Scientists Citing Nabil Amara

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles