What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Social science
- Statistics
- Management
Giovanni Abramo focuses on Bibliometrics, Productivity, Operations research, Hard and soft science and Research assessment.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Actuarial science and Public relations in addition to Bibliometrics.
His work deals with themes such as Quality, Management, Performance indicator, Mathematics education and University system, which intersect with Productivity.
His Operations research research incorporates elements of Reliability, Representativeness heuristic and Econometrics.
His study looks at the relationship between Hard and soft science and topics such as Allocative efficiency, which overlap with Accounting, Strengths and weaknesses and Scale.
As a member of one scientific family, Giovanni Abramo mostly works in the field of Data science, focusing on Subject and, on occasion, Citation.
His most cited work include:
- Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? (198 citations)
- A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (153 citations)
- University–industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination (130 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Bibliometrics, Work, Hard and soft science, Productivity and Public relations.
His Bibliometrics study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Social science, Actuarial science and Operations research.
Giovanni Abramo has researched Hard and soft science in several fields, including Data science, Higher education, University system and Econometrics.
His Econometrics research focuses on Citation and how it connects with Proxy and Subject.
The concepts of his Productivity study are interwoven with issues in Ranking and Excellence.
His Public relations study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Private sector, Internationalization and Multidisciplinary approach.
He most often published in these fields:
- Bibliometrics (47.84%)
- Work (45.85%)
- Hard and soft science (52.16%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Work (45.85%)
- Scientific production (13.95%)
- Regional science (7.31%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Work, Scientific production, Regional science, Citation and Field.
His Regional science study which covers Norwegian that intersects with Mathematics education, Citation impact and Focus.
His Citation research includes elements of Bibliometrics, Actuarial science and Sociology of scientific knowledge.
While working in this field, Giovanni Abramo studies both Bibliometrics and Research evaluation.
His Actuarial science research incorporates themes from Value and Operationalization.
His Public relations study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Productivity, Higher education and Brain drain.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Predicting publication long-term impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor (32 citations)
- Predicting long-term publication impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor. (27 citations)
- A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy (14 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Statistics
- Social science
- Management
His scientific interests lie mostly in Bibliometrics, Citation, Public relations, Time windows and Actuarial science.
His Bibliometrics study incorporates themes from Analogy and Empirical research.
Citation is closely attributed to Discipline in his research.
The Public relations study combines topics in areas such as Productivity and Scientometrics.
His Productivity research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Higher education, Brain drain and Public policy.
His work in Actuarial science addresses issues such as Test, which are connected to fields such as R&D management and Empirical evidence.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
