H-Index & Metrics Best Publications

H-Index & Metrics

Discipline name H-index Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Engineering and Technology D-index 47 Citations 6,438 132 World Ranking 1782 National Ranking 42
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 47 Citations 6,486 159 World Ranking 1485 National Ranking 11

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social science
  • Statistics
  • Management

Giovanni Abramo focuses on Bibliometrics, Productivity, Operations research, Hard and soft science and Research assessment. The study incorporates disciplines such as Actuarial science and Public relations in addition to Bibliometrics. His work deals with themes such as Quality, Management, Performance indicator, Mathematics education and University system, which intersect with Productivity.

His Operations research research incorporates elements of Reliability, Representativeness heuristic and Econometrics. His study looks at the relationship between Hard and soft science and topics such as Allocative efficiency, which overlap with Accounting, Strengths and weaknesses and Scale. As a member of one scientific family, Giovanni Abramo mostly works in the field of Data science, focusing on Subject and, on occasion, Citation.

His most cited work include:

  • Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? (198 citations)
  • A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (153 citations)
  • University–industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination (130 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Bibliometrics, Work, Hard and soft science, Productivity and Public relations. His Bibliometrics study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Social science, Actuarial science and Operations research. Giovanni Abramo has researched Hard and soft science in several fields, including Data science, Higher education, University system and Econometrics.

His Econometrics research focuses on Citation and how it connects with Proxy and Subject. The concepts of his Productivity study are interwoven with issues in Ranking and Excellence. His Public relations study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Private sector, Internationalization and Multidisciplinary approach.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Bibliometrics (47.84%)
  • Work (45.85%)
  • Hard and soft science (52.16%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Work (45.85%)
  • Scientific production (13.95%)
  • Regional science (7.31%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Work, Scientific production, Regional science, Citation and Field. His Regional science study which covers Norwegian that intersects with Mathematics education, Citation impact and Focus. His Citation research includes elements of Bibliometrics, Actuarial science and Sociology of scientific knowledge.

While working in this field, Giovanni Abramo studies both Bibliometrics and Research evaluation. His Actuarial science research incorporates themes from Value and Operationalization. His Public relations study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Productivity, Higher education and Brain drain.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Predicting publication long-term impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor (32 citations)
  • Predicting long-term publication impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor. (27 citations)
  • A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy (14 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Statistics
  • Social science
  • Management

His scientific interests lie mostly in Bibliometrics, Citation, Public relations, Time windows and Actuarial science. His Bibliometrics study incorporates themes from Analogy and Empirical research. Citation is closely attributed to Discipline in his research.

The Public relations study combines topics in areas such as Productivity and Scientometrics. His Productivity research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Higher education, Brain drain and Public policy. His work in Actuarial science addresses issues such as Test, which are connected to fields such as R&D management and Empirical evidence.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation?

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo;Flavia Di Costa.
Higher Education (2009)

330 Citations

University–industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination

Giovanni Abramo;Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo;Flavia Di Costa;Marco Solazzi.
Technovation (2009)

232 Citations

Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo;Alessandro Caprasecca.
Scientometrics (2009)

184 Citations

The relationship between scientists' research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo;Marco Solazzi.
Scientometrics (2011)

184 Citations

Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo.
Scientometrics (2011)

184 Citations

How do you define and measure research productivity

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D'angelo.
Scientometrics (2014)

182 Citations

Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help?

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo;Alessandro Caprasecca.
Research Policy (2009)

178 Citations

Gender differences in research collaboration

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo;Gianluca Murgia.
Journal of Informetrics (2013)

170 Citations

A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments

Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo;Cristiano Giuffrida;Giovanni Abramo.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2011)

166 Citations

The measurement of Italian universities' research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology

Giovanni Abramo;Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo;Fabio Pugini.
Scientometrics (2008)

146 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Giovanni Abramo

Lutz Bornmann

Lutz Bornmann

Max Planck Society

Publications: 42

Mike Thelwall

Mike Thelwall

University of Wolverhampton

Publications: 33

Vincent Larivière

Vincent Larivière

University of Montreal

Publications: 18

Rodrigo Costas

Rodrigo Costas

Leiden University

Publications: 18

Ludo Waltman

Ludo Waltman

Leiden University

Publications: 17

Loet Leydesdorff

Loet Leydesdorff

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 14

Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro

Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro

Technical University of Madrid

Publications: 12

Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Indiana University

Publications: 11

Ronald Rousseau

Ronald Rousseau

KU Leuven

Publications: 10

Nees Jan van Eck

Nees Jan van Eck

Leiden University

Publications: 8

Alan L. Porter

Alan L. Porter

Georgia Institute of Technology

Publications: 7

María Bordons

María Bordons

Spanish National Research Council

Publications: 7

Andrea Bonaccorsi

Andrea Bonaccorsi

University of Pisa

Publications: 7

Daniele Checchi

Daniele Checchi

University of Milan

Publications: 7

Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo

Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo

University of Rome Tor Vergata

Publications: 6

John Mingers

John Mingers

University of Kent

Publications: 6

Something went wrong. Please try again later.