D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Engineering and Technology D-index 36 Citations 5,164 121 World Ranking 3257 National Ranking 93
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 36 Citations 5,335 149 World Ranking 2800 National Ranking 22

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social science
  • Statistics
  • Management

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Bibliometrics, Productivity, Hard and soft science, Operations research and Work. The study incorporates disciplines such as Higher education, University system and Public relations in addition to Bibliometrics. His Productivity research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Mathematics education, Management, Econometrics and Ranking.

His Hard and soft science research includes themes of Allocative efficiency and Operations management. He works mostly in the field of Operations research, limiting it down to topics relating to Reliability and, in certain cases, Discipline and Variation, as a part of the same area of interest. With his scientific publications, his incorporates both Work and Individual level.

His most cited work include:

  • Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? (198 citations)
  • A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (153 citations)
  • University–industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination (130 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Bibliometrics, Work, Hard and soft science, Productivity and Public relations are his primary areas of study. His study in Bibliometrics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Social science and Operations research. His Hard and soft science research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Data science, Higher education, University system and Citation.

His work carried out in the field of Citation brings together such families of science as Proxy and Descriptive statistics. In his study, University level is inextricably linked to Econometrics, which falls within the broad field of Productivity. Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo performs integrative study on Public relations and Extramural in his works.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Bibliometrics (40.70%)
  • Work (37.89%)
  • Hard and soft science (29.82%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Work (37.89%)
  • Scientific production (13.68%)
  • Citation (15.09%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo mainly investigates Work, Scientific production, Citation, Bibliometrics and Regional science. His Work research spans across into subjects like Public relations, Field, Ask price, Brain drain and Higher education. His Public relations research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Productivity, Gender analysis, Science policy and Scientometrics.

His studies in Citation integrate themes in fields like Actuarial science, Specialization and Sociology of scientific knowledge. In his research, R&D management and Empirical evidence is intimately related to Test, which falls under the overarching field of Bibliometrics. His studies deal with areas such as Field and Norwegian as well as Regional science.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Predicting publication long-term impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor (32 citations)
  • Predicting long-term publication impact through a combination of early citations and journal impact factor. (27 citations)
  • A gender analysis of top scientists’ collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy (14 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social science
  • Statistics
  • Management

His primary areas of study are Bibliometrics, Citation, Scientific production, Public relations and Research evaluation. The various areas that Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo examines in his Bibliometrics study include Mathematics education, Balance and Knowledge management. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Discipline, Actuarial science and Research Assessment Exercise.

His study in Public relations is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Productivity and Scientometrics. His work deals with themes such as Public policy and Norwegian, which intersect with Productivity. Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo combines Measure and Work in his studies.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation?

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo;Flavia Di Costa.
Higher Education (2009)

330 Citations

University–industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination

Giovanni Abramo;Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo;Flavia Di Costa;Marco Solazzi.
Technovation (2009)

232 Citations

Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo;Alessandro Caprasecca.
Scientometrics (2009)

184 Citations

The relationship between scientists' research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo;Marco Solazzi.
Scientometrics (2011)

184 Citations

Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo.
Scientometrics (2011)

184 Citations

How do you define and measure research productivity

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D'angelo.
Scientometrics (2014)

182 Citations

Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help?

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo;Alessandro Caprasecca.
Research Policy (2009)

178 Citations

Gender differences in research collaboration

Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo;Gianluca Murgia.
Journal of Informetrics (2013)

170 Citations

A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments

Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo;Cristiano Giuffrida;Giovanni Abramo.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2011)

166 Citations

The measurement of Italian universities' research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology

Giovanni Abramo;Giovanni Abramo;Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo;Fabio Pugini.
Scientometrics (2008)

146 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo

Lutz Bornmann

Lutz Bornmann

Max Planck Society

Publications: 42

Mike Thelwall

Mike Thelwall

University of Wolverhampton

Publications: 32

Rodrigo Costas

Rodrigo Costas

Leiden University

Publications: 22

Vincent Larivière

Vincent Larivière

University of Montreal

Publications: 18

Ludo Waltman

Ludo Waltman

Leiden University

Publications: 17

Loet Leydesdorff

Loet Leydesdorff

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 14

Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro

Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro

Technical University of Madrid

Publications: 12

Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Indiana University

Publications: 11

Ronald Rousseau

Ronald Rousseau

KU Leuven

Publications: 10

Alan L. Porter

Alan L. Porter

Georgia Institute of Technology

Publications: 7

Daniele Checchi

Daniele Checchi

University of Milan

Publications: 7

María Bordons

María Bordons

Spanish National Research Council

Publications: 7

Barry Bozeman

Barry Bozeman

Arizona State University

Publications: 6

Nees Jan van Eck

Nees Jan van Eck

Leiden University

Publications: 6

John Mingers

John Mingers

University of Kent

Publications: 6

Margit Osterloh

Margit Osterloh

University of Zurich

Publications: 6

Something went wrong. Please try again later.