World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
47
Citations
9181
World Ranking
2510
National Ranking
198

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
49
Citations
9523
World Ranking
4025
National Ranking
448

Mick E. Hanley publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mick E. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 90 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Mick E. Hanley D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mick E. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mick E. Hanley is affiliated with Plymouth University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines within environmental science, earth and planetary sciences, and agricultural and biological sciences.

Their primary fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these fields, Hanley focuses on several subfields, such as:

  • Oceanography
  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

The main research topics include:

  • Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Coastal and Marine Management
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Plant and animal studies

Hanley has published extensively in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets are:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Annals of Botany
  • Journal of Applied Ecology

Some of their recent research papers include:

  • Greening of grey infrastructure should not be used as a Trojan horse to facilitate coastal development, 2020, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • A global analysis of complexity-biodiversity relationships on marine artificial structures, 2020, Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • Fire as a Selective Agent for both Serotiny and Nonserotiny Over Space and Time, 2020, Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
  • Native woodland establishment improves soil hydrological functioning in UK upland pastoral catchments, 2020, Land Degradation and Development
  • Facing up to climate change: Community composition varies with aspect and surface temperature in the rocky intertidal, 2021, Marine Environmental Research

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Louise B. Firth
  • Antony M. Knights
  • Richard C. Thompson
  • Paul Lunt
  • Andy Foggo

Best Publications

  • Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defence

    Mick E. Hanley;Mick E. Hanley;Byron B. Lamont;Meredith M. Fairbanks;Christine M. Rafferty

  • The city as a refuge for insect pollinators.

    Damon M. Hall;Gerardo R. Camilo;Rebecca K. Tonietto;Jeff Ollerton

  • Plants and climate change: complexities and surprises.

    Camille Parmesan;Mick E. Hanley

  • Causes of rarity in bumblebees

    Dave Goulson;Michael E Hanley;Ben Darvill;Jonathan Ellis

  • Between a rock and a hard place: Environmental and engineering considerations when designing coastal defence structures

    L. B. Firth;R. C. Thompson;K. Bohn;M. Abbiati

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts

    Lawrence N Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L L Hill;Samantha L L Hill

  • Shifting sands? Coastal protection by sand banks, beaches and dunes

    M.E. Hanley;S.P.G. Hoggart;D.J. Simmonds;A. Bichot

  • Breeding system, pollinator choice and variation in pollen quality in British herbaceous plants

    Michael E Hanley;Miguel Franco;Samuel Pichon;Ben Darvill

  • An experimental field study of the effects of mollusc grazing on seedling recruitment and survival in grassland.

    M. E. Hanley;M. Fenner;P. J. Edwards

  • Comparison of seedling and adult palatability in annual and perennial plants

    M. Fenner;M. E. Hanley;R. Lawrence

  • Plant ontogeny and chemical defence: older seedlings are better defended

    Arnaud Elger;Damien G. Lemoine;Michael Fenner;Mick E. Hanley

  • The effect of seedling age on the likelihood of herbivory by the slug Deroceras reticulatum

    M. E. Hanley;M. Fenner;P. J. Edwards

  • Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes : Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases

    Adriana De Palma;Adriana De Palma;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • Predicting calyptrate fly populations from the weather, and probable consequences of climate change

    Dave Goulson;Lara C. Derwent;Michael E. Hanley;Derek W. Dunn

  • Design catalogue for eco-engineering of coastal artificial structures: a multifunctional approach for stakeholders and end-users

    Kathryn O'Shaughnessy;Stephen J. Hawkins;Ally J. Evans;Ally J. Evans;Mick E. Hanley

  • Seedling-herbivore interactions: insights into plant defence and regeneration patterns.

    Kasey E. Barton;Mick E. Hanley

  • Greening of grey infrastructure should not be used as a Trojan horse to facilitate coastal development

    Louise B. Firth;Laura Airoldi;Fabio Bulleri;Steve Challinor

  • Timing of cotyledon damage affects growth and flowering in mature plants.

    M. E. Hanley;E. L. Fegan

  • Potential benefits of commercial willow Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) for farm-scale plant and invertebrate communities in the agri-environment

    Rebecca L Rowe;Michael E Hanley;Dave Goulson;Donna J Clarke

  • Early plant growth: identifying the end point of the seedling phase

    M. E. Hanley;M. Fenner;H. Whibley;B. Darvill

  • Bioenergy, food production and biodiversity - an unlikely alliance?

    Peter Manning;Gail Taylor;Mick E. Hanley

  • Seedling herbivory, community composition and plant life history traits

    Mick E. Hanley

  • The consequences of doing nothing: the effects of seawater flooding on coastal zones

    S.P.G. Hoggart;M.E. Hanley;D.J. Parker;D.J. Simmonds

  • Herbivory, serotiny and seedling defence in Western Australian Proteaceae.

    Mick E. Hanley;Byron B. Lamont

  • The effect of mollusc grazing on seedling recruitment in artificially created grassland gaps.

    M. E. Hanley;M. Fenner;P. J. Edwards

  • Increased bumblebee abundance along the margins of a mass flowering crop: evidence for pollinator spill‐over

    M. E. Hanley;M. Franco;C. E. Dean;E. L. Franklin

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen J. Hawkins
Stephen J. Hawkins University of Southampton
Tim Diekötter
Tim Diekötter Kiel University
Jason M. Tylianakis
Jason M. Tylianakis University of Canterbury
Ben Darvill
Ben Darvill British Trust for Ornithology
Andy Purvis
Andy Purvis Natural History Museum
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson Plymouth University
Tom M. Fayle
Tom M. Fayle Queen Mary University of London
Dave Goulson
Dave Goulson University of Sussex
Steven J. Fonte
Steven J. Fonte Colorado State University
Byron B. Lamont
Byron B. Lamont Curtin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mick E. Hanley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles