World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
106
Citations
63997
World Ranking
201
National Ranking
24

Ken Thompson publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken Thompson sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 230 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ken Thompson D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken Thompson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ken Thompson is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Environmental Science.

Their work is concentrated on subfields including Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Ecology, and Molecular Biology. Within these areas, key topics addressed include Plant and Animal Studies, Genetic Diversity and Population Structure, Animal Behavior and Reproduction, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, and Plant Parasitism and Resistance.

Thompson's recent publications cover a range of subjects and include:

  • Patterns, Predictors, and Consequences of Dominance in Hybrids, 2020, The American Naturalist
  • The Ecology of Hybrid Incompatibilities, 2023, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology
  • Buffering effects of soil seed banks on plant community composition in response to land use and climate, 2020, Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • Multivariate phenotypic divergence along an urbanization gradient, 2020, Biology Letters
  • Predicting the strength of urban-rural clines in a Mendelian polymorphism along a latitudinal gradient, 2020, Evolution Letters

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Dolph Schluter
  • Hilde Schneemann
  • Diana J. Rennison
  • Mackenzie Urquhart-Cronish
  • Jenn M. Coughlan

Their publications often appear in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Evolution Letters, The American Naturalist, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, and Molecular Ecology.

Best Publications

  • New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide

    N. Pérez-Harguindeguy;S. Díaz;E. Garnier;S. Lavorel

  • Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility

    Mark A. Davis;J. Philip Grime;Ken Thompson

  • Corrigendum to: New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide

    N. Pérez-Harguindeguy;S. Díaz;E. Garnier;S. Lavorel

  • TRY - a global database of plant traits

    J. Kattge;S. Díaz;S. Lavorel;I. C. Prentice

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • The ecology of seeds

    Michael Fenner;Ken Thompson

  • The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents.

    S. Díaz;J.G. Hodgson;K. Thompson;M. Cabido

  • The LEDA Traitbase: A database of life-history traits of the Northwest European flora

    M Kleyer;RM Bekker;RM Bekker;IC Knevel;IC Knevel;JP Bakker

  • SEASONAL VARIATION IN THE SEED BANKS OF HERBACEOUS SPECIES IN TEN CONTRASTING HABITATS

    Unknown

  • The Soil Seed Banks of North West Europe: Methodology, Density and Longevity

    Ken Thompson;Jan Pouwel Bakker;Renée M. Bekker

  • Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology

    E Weiher;A Van der Werf;Ken Thompson;Michael Roderick

  • Don't judge species on their origins

    Mark A. Davis;Matthew K. Chew;Richard J. Hobbs;Ariel E. Lugo

  • Seed size and shape predict persistence in soil

    K. Thompson;S. R. Band;J. G. Hodgson

  • Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies

    Peter J. Wilson;Ken Thompson;John G. Hodgson

  • Climate change and plant regeneration from seed

    Jeffrey L. Walck;Siti N. Hidayati;Kingsley W. Dixon;Ken Thompson

  • Seed banks and seed dispersal: important topics in restoration ecology

    J. P. Bakker;P. Poschlod;R. J. Strykstra;R. M. Bekker

  • Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions

    William J. Sutherland;Robert P. Freckleton;H. Charles J. Godfray;Steven R. Beissinger

  • Seeds: Physiology of Development and Germination.

    Ken Thompson;J. D. Bewley;M. Black

  • The domestic garden – Its contribution to urban green infrastructure

    Ross W.F. Cameron;Tijana Blanuša;Tijana Blanuša;Jane E. Taylor;Andrew Salisbury

  • Allocating C-S-R plant functional types : a soft approach to a hard problem

    J. G. Hodgson;P. J. Wilson;R. Hunt;J. P. Grime

  • The Soil Seed Banks of North West Europe.

    A. R. Watkinson;K. Thompson;J. P. Bakker;R. M. Bekker

  • The Ecology of Seeds: References

    Michael Fenner;Ken Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

John G. Hodgson
John G. Hodgson University of Sheffield
Renée M. Bekker
Renée M. Bekker University of Groningen
Peter Poschlod
Peter Poschlod University of Regensburg
J. P. Grime
J. P. Grime University of Sheffield
Kevin J. Gaston
Kevin J. Gaston University of Exeter
Philip H. Warren
Philip H. Warren University of Sheffield
Jan P. Bakker
Jan P. Bakker University of Groningen
Wim A. Ozinga
Wim A. Ozinga Wageningen University & Research
Johannes H. C. Cornelissen
Johannes H. C. Cornelissen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Petr Pyšek
Petr Pyšek Czech Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in Ecology and Evolution broadens your opportunities in science and research. Many students consider flexible education options, comparing which school is better snhu vs wgu to find the best fit for their career goals. Online learning provides access to top-ranked programs and allows you to balance study with other commitments.

If you are interested in healthcare, consider transitioning through specialized pathways such as bsn to msn programs online. These bridge programs are designed for advancement in medical fields, but similar online options exist in environmental science, biology, and public policy.

Enrolling in non profit universities can offer quality instruction, accreditation, and financial transparency. These institutions are often recognized for their reputable faculty and strong support services for distance learners.

Active-duty military and veterans seeking a science degree will benefit from the best military friendly colleges in America. These colleges provide dedicated resources, flexible scheduling, and financial aid to support education while serving.

Best Scientists Citing Ken Thompson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles