World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
13360
World Ranking
6238
National Ranking
152

Wim A. Ozinga publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim A. Ozinga sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Wim A. Ozinga D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim A. Ozinga sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wim A. Ozinga is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with significant contributions in related subfields such as Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Atmospheric Science, and Plant Science.

The researcher's main topics of study include:

  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Climate change and permafrost

Wim A. Ozinga's work appears in several scientific venues, with multiple publications in Global Ecology and Biogeography and SSRN Electronic Journal, as well as contributions to Nature Ecology & Evolution, Nature Communications, and Vegetation Classification and Survey.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Root traits explain plant species distributions along climatic gradients yet challenge the nature of ecological trade-offs, 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Global plant trait relationships extend to the climatic extremes of the tundra biome, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Ecological Indicator Values for Europe (EIVE) 1.0, 2023, Vegetation Classification and Survey
  • Traits of dominant plant species drive normalized difference vegetation index in grasslands globally, 2023, Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • Effects of field-level strip and mixed cropping on aerial arthropod and arable flora communities, 2023, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

Wim A. Ozinga frequently collaborates with several researchers in the field, including Milan Chytrý, Jürgen Dengler, Ülo Niinemets, Josep Peñuelas, and Francesco María Sabatini. These collaborations have contributed to advancing various aspects of ecology, plant traits, and environmental dynamics.

Best Publications

  • TRY - a global database of plant traits

    J. Kattge;S. Díaz;S. Lavorel;I. C. Prentice

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • The LEDA Traitbase: A database of life-history traits of the Northwest European flora

    M Kleyer;RM Bekker;RM Bekker;IC Knevel;IC Knevel;JP Bakker

  • Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome

    Anne D. Bjorkman;Anne D. Bjorkman;Isla H. Myers-Smith;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Signe Normand

  • Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities

    Helge Bruelheide;Jürgen Dengler;Jürgen Dengler;Oliver Purschke;Jonathan Lenoir

  • Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in The Netherlands.

    Jeroen Scheper;Menno Reemer;Ruud van Kats;Wim A. Ozinga;Wim A. Ozinga

  • Dispersal failure contributes to plant losses in NW Europe.

    Wim A. Ozinga;Wim A. Ozinga;Christine Römermann;Renée M. Bekker;Andreas Prinzing

  • Predictability of plant species composition from environmental conditions is constrained by dispersal limitation

    W.A. Ozinga;J.H.J. Schaminée;R.M. Bekker;S. Bonn

  • The global spectrum of plant form and function: enhanced species-level trait dataset

    Unknown

  • Dispersal potential in plant communities depends on environmental conditions

    Wim A. Ozinga;Wim A. Ozinga;Renée M. Bekker;Joop H. J. Schaminée;Jan M. Van Groenendael

  • sPlot – A new tool for global vegetation analyses

    Helge Bruelheide;Jürgen Dengler;Jürgen Dengler;Borja Jiménez-Alfaro;Borja Jiménez-Alfaro;Oliver Purschke

  • Selecting traits that explain species–environment relationships: a generalized linear mixed model approach

    Tahira Jamil;Tahira Jamil;Wim A. Ozinga;Wim A. Ozinga;Michael Kleyer;Cajo J.F. ter Braak

  • Less lineages – more trait variation: phylogenetically clustered plant communities are functionally more diverse

    Andreas Prinzing;Reineke Reiffers;Wim G. Braakhekke;Stephan M. Hennekens

  • Standaardlijst van de Nederlandse flora 2003

    W.L.M. Tamis;R. van der Meijden;J. Runhaar;R.M. Bekker

  • Importance of regional species pools and functional traits in colonization processes: predicting re-colonization after large-scale destruction of ecosystems

    Anita Kirmer;Sabine Tischew;Wim A. Ozinga;Wim A. Ozinga;Maud Von Lampe

  • How important is long‐distance seed dispersal for the regional survival of plant species?

    Merel B. Soons;Wim A. Ozinga;Wim A. Ozinga

  • Root traits explain plant species distributions along climatic gradients yet challenge the nature of ecological trade-offs

    Daniel C. Laughlin;Liesje Mommer;Francesco Maria Sabatini;Helge Bruelheide

  • Do plant traits retrieved from a database accurately predict on-site measurements?

    Verena Cordlandwehr;Verena Cordlandwehr;Rebecca L. Meredith;Wim A. Ozinga;Wim A. Ozinga;Renée M. Bekker

  • Spatial patterns and climate relationships of major plant traits in the New World differ between woody and herbaceous species

    Irena Šímová;Cyrille Violle;Jens Christian Svenning;Jens Kattge

  • Is biofuel policy harming biodiversity in Europe

    Jeannette Eggers;Katja Tröltzsch;Alessandra Falcucci;Luigi Maiorano

  • Niche differentiation and expansion of plant species are associated with mycorrhizal symbiosis.

    Maret Gerz;C. Guillermo Bueno;Wim A. Ozinga;Wim A. Ozinga;Martin Zobel

Frequent Co-Authors

Joop H.J. Schaminée
Joop H.J. Schaminée Wageningen University & Research
Andreas Prinzing
Andreas Prinzing University of Rennes
Renée M. Bekker
Renée M. Bekker University of Groningen
Benjamin Blonder
Benjamin Blonder University of California, Berkeley
Ingolf Kühn
Ingolf Kühn Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Peter Poschlod
Peter Poschlod University of Regensburg
Peter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich University of Minnesota
Jan P. Bakker
Jan P. Bakker University of Groningen
Jens Kattge
Jens Kattge Max Planck Society
Anne D. Bjorkman
Anne D. Bjorkman University of Gothenburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore academic options in Ecology and Evolution, consider how related fields can expand your expertise and career opportunities. Online graduate programs now offer flexible pathways to intersect environmental science with psychology and counseling. For example, some students may be interested in a master of mental health online to address the human dimensions of environmental change or conservation-related stress.

Others might be drawn to fields like forensic science and psychology. Programs such as forensic psychology masters programs allow graduates to connect ecological concerns with legal and behavioral studies, from wildlife crime to environmental justice.

If your interests overlap with youth development or environmental education, a masters in child psychology program could provide the skills to work with children and adolescents, helping to foster the next generation of environmental leaders.

Additionally, the broad range of online masters degrees in counseling can enhance your toolkit—whether you hope to support individuals and communities through conservation challenges or guide well-being in natural settings. These interdisciplinary degrees open up new career pathways that combine a passion for the environment with people-focused expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Wim A. Ozinga

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles