World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Ecology and Evolution
Czechia
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 75 1030 982 5 5 287 28492

Jan Lepš publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Lepš between 1980 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Lepš published across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2020. 12 of the 348 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2020. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1980 2026

348 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Lepš: publications per year, 1980 to 2026
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 2
1982 1
1983 1
1984 1
1985 4
1986 0
1987 6
1988 3
1989 2
1990 6
1991 4
1992 3
1993 3
1994 2
1995 2
1996 4
1997 2
1998 2
1999 4
2000 3
2001 5
2002 3
2003 25
2004 6
2005 3
2006 6
2007 7
2008 6
2009 7
2010 7
2011 10
2012 10
2013 9
2014 28
2015 13
2016 14
2017 12
2018 6
2019 11
2020 29
2021 20
2022 17
2023 12
2024 14
2025 11
2026 1
Total 348
Download as CSV

Jan Lepš publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Lepš sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 287–291 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 287 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45 287
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Lepš D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Lepš sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60 75
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Czechia Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Czechia Leader Award

Overview

Jan Lepš is affiliated with the University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice in the Czech Republic. Their research primarily spans fields such as Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with significant contributions to Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's work covers several topics related to ecology, vegetation dynamics, and species studies. Major research areas include:

  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services

Jan Lepš has published in various academic journals and venues. Frequent publication platforms include:

  • Journal of Vegetation Science
  • Journal of Ecology
  • Functional Ecology
  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on ecosystem stability, community dynamics, and functional traits within ecology. Examples include:

  • "Functional trait effects on ecosystem stability: assembling the jigsaw puzzle" (2021, Trends in Ecology & Evolution)
  • "Synchrony matters more than species richness in plant community stability at a global scale" (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • "Towards a more balanced combination of multiple traits when computing functional differences between species" (2020, Methods in Ecology and Evolution)
  • "Pladias Database of the Czech flora and vegetation" (2021, Preslia)
  • "Biotic homogenization destabilizes ecosystem functioning by decreasing spatial asynchrony" (2021, Ecology)

Frequent collaborators of Jan Lepš include:

  • Petr Šmilauer
  • Aleš Lisner
  • Francesco de Bello
  • Lars Götzenberger
  • Enrique Valencia

In addition to articles, Jan Lepš has contributed to book publishing, notably with the title "Biostatistics with R" released by Cambridge University Press in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO

    Jan Lepš;Petr Šmilauer

  • Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data

    Jan Leps̆;Petr S̆milauer

  • Ecological assembly rules in plant communities--approaches, patterns and prospects.

    Lars Götzenberger;Francesco de Bello;Kari Anne Bråthen;John Davison

  • Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using Canoco 5

    Petr Šmilauer;Jan LepŠ

  • Assessing the effects of land-use change on plant traits, communities and ecosystem functioning in grasslands: a standardized methodology and lessons from an application to 11 European sites.

    Eric Garnier;Sandra Lavorel;Pauline Ansquer;Helena Castro

  • Quantifying and interpreting functional diversity of natural communities: practical considerations matter

    J. Leps;F. de Bello;S. Lavorel;S. Berman

  • Community trait response to environment: disentangling species turnover vs intraspecific trait variability effects

    Jan Lepš;Francesco de Bello;Petr Šmilauer;Jiří Doležal

  • Traits Without Borders: Integrating Functional Diversity Across Scales

    Carlos P. Carmona;Francesco de Bello;Francesco de Bello;Norman W.H. Mason;Jan Lepš;Jan Lepš

  • Guild-specific patterns of species richness and host specialization in plant–herbivore food webs from a tropical forest

    Vojtech Novotny;Scott E. Miller;Leontine Baje;Solomon Balagawi

  • Leaf traits capture the effects of land use changes and climate on litter decomposability of grasslands across Europe

    Claire Fortunel;Eric Garnier;Richard Joffre;Elena Kazakou

  • Variations in species and functional plant diversity along climatic and grazing gradients

    Francesco De Bello;Jan Lepš;Maria-Teresa Sebastià

  • Assessing species and community functional responses to environmental gradients: which multivariate methods?

    Michael Kleyer;Stéphane Dray;Stéphane Dray;Francescode Bello;Jan Lepš

  • The partitioning of diversity: showing Theseus a way out of the labyrinth

    Francesco De Bello;Sébastien Lavergne;Christine N. Meynard;Jan Lepš

  • Community stability, complexity and species life history strategies

    J. Lepš;J. Osbornová-Kosinová;M. Rejmánek

  • Partitioning of functional diversity reveals the scale and extent of trait convergence and divergence

    Francesco De Bello;Francesco De Bello;Wilfried Thuiller;Jan Lepš;Jan Lepš;Philippe Choler

  • Quantifying the relevance of intraspecific trait variability for functional diversity

    Francesco de Bello;Francesco de Bello;Sandra Lavorel;Cécile H. Albert;Wilfried Thuiller

  • Nutrient status, disturbance and competition: an experimental test of relationships in a wet meadow

    Jan Lepš

  • Effect of small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indochinese montane rainforest

    Karel Spitzer;Josef Jaros̆;Jan Havelka;Jan Leps̆

  • WHY THERE ARE SO FEW SPECIES OF APHIDS, ESPECIALLY IN THE TROPICS

    A. F. G. Dixon;P. Kindlmann;J. Leps;J. Holman

  • Predictive value of plant traits to grazing along a climatic gradient in the Mediterranean

    Francesco De Bello;Jan Lepš;Maria-Teresa Sebastià

  • Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO: Preface

    Jan Lepš;Petr Šmilauer

  • Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO 5: Sample data sets and projects

    Petr Šmilauer;Jan Lepš

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesco de Bello
Francesco de Bello Spanish National Research Council
Jiří Doležal
Jiří Doležal Czech Academy of Sciences
Lars Götzenberger
Lars Götzenberger Czech Academy of Sciences
Sandra Lavorel
Sandra Lavorel Grenoble Alpes University
Yoann Le Bagousse-Pinguet
Yoann Le Bagousse-Pinguet King Juan Carlos University
Carlos P. Carmona
Carlos P. Carmona University of Tartu
Yves Basset
Yves Basset Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Meelis Pärtel
Meelis Pärtel University of Tartu
Maria-Teresa Sebastià
Maria-Teresa Sebastià University of Lleida
Jitka Klimešová
Jitka Klimešová Czech Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Ecology and Evolution can lead to diverse career opportunities. If you’re considering a flexible path, many students explore online degree programs in the sciences and related fields. When evaluating programs, it’s important to compare factors like accreditation, affordability, and support for your unique background. For example, those interested in a career shift may want to look at differences between the chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program options to see how specialized online degrees compare.

Advanced degrees, such as moving from a bachelor’s to a master’s in science and related fields, are increasingly popular online. Programs like the bsn to msn online pathway highlight how students can efficiently bridge educational gaps while maintaining work or family commitments.

Additionally, look for not for profit online colleges for more reputable and cost-effective options. If you have a military background, exploring military friendly online colleges can help you find programs with robust support and tailored resources.

With so many options, the online landscape offers flexible, specialized paths to thriving careers in Ecology and Evolution, as well as in allied health and environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Lepš

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles