World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
9367
World Ranking
14046
National Ranking
5923

Laurie G. Hudson publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurie G. Hudson sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 156 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Laurie G. Hudson D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurie G. Hudson sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laurie G. Hudson is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States and has contributed to research spanning biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and environmental science. Their work addresses topics in molecular biology, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, environmental chemistry, cancer research, and immunology.

Their research focuses on themes such as arsenic contamination and mitigation, heavy metal exposure and toxicity, carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, trace elements in health, DNA repair mechanisms, radioactivity and radon measurements, and bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research.

Recent publications include:

  • Arsenic co-carcinogenesis: Inhibition of DNA repair and interaction with zinc finger proteins, 2021, Seminars in Cancer Biology
  • Arsenic and cancer: Evidence and mechanisms, 2022, Advances in pharmacology
  • Developmental toxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to uranium: A comparison with lead, cadmium, and iron, 2020, Environmental Pollution
  • The immunotoxicity of natural and depleted uranium: From cells to people, 2022, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
  • Differential response of human T-lymphocytes to arsenic and uranium, 2020, Toxicology Letters

Laurie G. Hudson collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Ke Jian Liu
  • Erica J. Dashner-Titus
  • Angela Wandinger-Ness
  • Xixi Zhou
  • Karen L. Cooper

Their work is often published in venues such as Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Clinical Cancer Research, Seminars in Cancer Biology, and Advances in pharmacology.

Best Publications

  • Drug Repurposing from an Academic Perspective.

    Tudor I. Oprea;Julie E. Bauman;Cristian G. Bologa;Tione Buranda

  • Oxidative stress and apoptosis in metal ion-induced carcinogenesis

    Honglian Shi;Laurie G. Hudson;Ke Jian Liu

  • Developmental transcription factor slug is required for effective re-epithelialization by adult keratinocytes.

    Pierre Savagner;Donna Frances Kusewitt;Ethan A. Carver;Fabrice Magnino

  • Engagement of Collagen-Binding Integrins Promotes Matrix Metalloproteinase-9–Dependent E-Cadherin Ectodomain Shedding in Ovarian Carcinoma Cells

    Jaime Symowicz;Brian P. Adley;Kara J. Gleason;Jeffrey J. Johnson

  • Sustained activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. A mechanism underlying receptor tyrosine kinase specificity for matrix metalloproteinase-9 induction and cell migration.

    Lisa J. McCawley;Shunan Li;Elizabeth V. Wattenberg;Laurie G. Hudson

  • Arsenite Interacts Selectively with Zinc Finger Proteins Containing C3H1 or C4 Motifs

    Xixi Zhou;Xi Sun;Karen L. Cooper;Feng Wang

  • Phenotypic plasticity of neoplastic ovarian epithelium: unique cadherin profiles in tumor progression

    Laurie G. Hudson;Reema Zeineldin;M. Sharon Stack

  • Inorganic arsenic compounds cause oxidative damage to DNA and protein by inducing ROS and RNS generation in human keratinocytes.

    Wei Ding;Laurie G. Hudson;Ke Jian Liu

  • Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Is a Mediator of Epidermal Growth Factor–Dependent E-Cadherin Loss in Ovarian Carcinoma Cells

    Karen D. Cowden Dahl;Jaime Symowicz;Yan Ning;Elisa Gutierrez

  • Arsenite causes DNA damage in keratinocytes via generation of hydroxyl radicals.

    Honglian Shi;Laurie G. Hudson;Wei Ding;Suwei Wang

  • Benzo(a)pyrene quinones increase cell proliferation, generate reactive oxygen species, and transactivate the epidermal growth factor receptor in breast epithelial cells.

    Andrew D. Burdick;John W. Davis;Ke Jian Liu;Laurie G. Hudson

  • ENHANCED MODULATION OF KERATINOCYTE MOTILITY BY TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR-ALPHA (TGF-ALPHA ) RELATIVE TO EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR (EGF)

    Donald Cha;Patricia O'Brien;Edel A. O'Toole;David T. Woodley

  • Ligand-activated thyroid hormone and retinoic acid receptors inhibit growth factor receptor promoter expression

    Laurie G. Hudson;June B. Santon;Christopher K. Glass;Gordon N. Gill

  • Characterization of a Cdc42 protein inhibitor and its use as a molecular probe.

    Lin Hong;S. Ray Kenney;Genevieve K. Phillips;Denise S. Simpson

  • The epidermal growth factor receptor responsive miR-125a represses mesenchymal morphology in ovarian cancer cells.

    Karen D. Cowden Dahl;Richard Dahl;Jessica N. Kruichak;Laurie G. Hudson

  • Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 by arsenite interferes with repair of oxidative DNA damage.

    Wei Ding;Wenlan Liu;Karen L. Cooper;Xu-Jun Qin

  • Contributions of the epidermal growth factor receptor to keratinocyte motility.

    Laurie G. Hudson;Lisa J. McCawley

  • Cyclooxygenase-2 functions as a downstream mediator of lysophosphatidic acid to promote aggressive behavior in ovarian carcinoma cells.

    Jaime Symowicz;Brian P. Adley;Michelle M.M. Woo;Nelly Auersperg

  • Cutaneous wound reepithelialization is compromised in mice lacking functional Slug (Snai2)

    Laurie G. Hudson;Kimberly M. Newkirk;Heather L. Chandler;Changsun Choi

  • Tyrosine-phosphorylated plakoglobin is associated with desmogleins but not desmoplakin after epidermal growth factor receptor activation.

    Claire A. Gaudry;Helena L. Palka;Rachel L. Dusek;Arthur C. Huen

Frequent Co-Authors

Angela Wandinger-Ness
Angela Wandinger-Ness University of New Mexico
Scott W. Burchiel
Scott W. Burchiel University of New Mexico
M. Sharon Stack
M. Sharon Stack University of Notre Dame
Larry A. Sklar
Larry A. Sklar University of New Mexico
Jeffrey Aubé
Jeffrey Aubé University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Brian Hjelle
Brian Hjelle University of New Mexico
Noriaki Tanaka
Noriaki Tanaka Okayama University
Lauren M. Aleksunes
Lauren M. Aleksunes Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Rytis Prekeris
Rytis Prekeris University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Cheryl L. Willman
Cheryl L. Willman University of New Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Biology and Biochemistry, there are many flexible study options and career paths to consider in today’s digital landscape. Online degrees can help you tailor your education toward specialized healthcare roles or advanced research positions without sacrificing your current commitments.

If you are aiming for a high-level nursing career, explore some of the best online dnp programs. These programs are designed for nurses seeking to expand their leadership and clinical expertise.

For those interested in management aspects of healthcare, pursuing a phd in healthcare management online can open doors to executive roles and policy careers.

Pharmacy is another dynamic field. Accredited pharmd online programs provide advanced pharmaceutical training for those seeking licensure or specialized practice.

If your interest lies in human health, fitness, or sports science, an online exercise science degree delivers the scientific foundation needed for careers in wellness, rehabilitation, or athletic training.

Each of these online study options offers the flexibility and depth needed to thrive in a range of science and health-related careers.

Best Scientists Citing Laurie G. Hudson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles