What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Gene
- Cell membrane
- Genetics
His primary areas of investigation include Cell biology, Endosome, Syntaxin, Transport protein and Cell membrane.
The concepts of his Cell biology study are interwoven with issues in Vesicular transport protein and Synaptic vesicle, Synaptobrevin.
His Endosome research incorporates elements of Endocytic cycle, Vesicle-associated membrane protein 8, Rab and Cytokinesis.
His study in the field of Endocytic recycling also crosses realms of Kinesin II complex.
His study in Midbody and Cleavage furrow is carried out as part of his studies in Cytokinesis.
His Midbody study combines topics in areas such as Cell cycle and Abscission.
His most cited work include:
- SNARE Interactions Are Not Selective: IMPLICATIONS FOR MEMBRANE FUSION SPECIFICITY (299 citations)
- The FIP3-Rab11 Protein Complex Regulates Recycling Endosome Targeting to the Cleavage Furrow during Late Cytokinesis (264 citations)
- Rab11-FIP3 and FIP4 interact with Arf6 and the Exocyst to control membrane traffic in cytokinesis (259 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Cell biology, Endosome, Cytokinesis, Midbody and Endocytic cycle.
Specifically, his work in Cell biology is concerned with the study of Rab.
Rytis Prekeris combines subjects such as Transport protein, Microtubule, ADP ribosylation factor, Apical membrane and Syntaxin with his study of Endosome.
His Transport protein research also works with subjects such as
- Golgi apparatus most often made with reference to Vesicular transport protein,
- Endocytosis which is related to area like Cell membrane.
His Cytokinesis study incorporates themes from GTPase, Abscission, Mitosis and Anaphase, Telophase.
His studies deal with areas such as Stem cell and Cell growth as well as Midbody.
He most often published in these fields:
- Cell biology (88.12%)
- Endosome (40.59%)
- Cytokinesis (38.61%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Cell biology (88.12%)
- Cytokinesis (38.61%)
- Cell division (17.82%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Rytis Prekeris mainly investigates Cell biology, Cytokinesis, Cell division, Cytoskeleton and Mitosis.
His work carried out in the field of Cell biology brings together such families of science as Zebrafish and Cell polarity.
His Cytokinesis study deals with GTPase intersecting with Microtubule nucleation and Vesicular transport protein.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Cell migration and Invadopodia in addition to Cytoskeleton.
His Mitosis research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Microtubule, Cleavage furrow and Anaphase, Telophase.
In his study, Abscission, Central spindle and Endocytic cycle is strongly linked to Actin cytoskeleton reorganization, which falls under the umbrella field of Microtubule.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The post-abscission midbody is an intracellular signaling organelle that regulates cell proliferation (23 citations)
- Insane in the apical membrane: Trafficking events mediating apicobasal epithelial polarity during tube morphogenesis. (18 citations)
- Rab GTPases and cell division. (12 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Gene
- Cell membrane
- Genetics
Rytis Prekeris spends much of his time researching Cell biology, Cell division, Cell polarity, Cytokinesis and Membrane transport.
Midbody is the focus of his Cell division research.
His Cytokinesis research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Telophase, Mitosis and Actin.
His Mitosis research incorporates themes from Cleavage furrow, Microtubule, Anaphase and Cytoskeleton.
His Membrane transport study spans across into subjects like Endosome, Rab, Vesicular transport protein, Epithelial polarity and Tube morphogenesis.
His study in Endosome is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Apical membrane, Morphogenesis and GTPase.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
